Talichad mogger spotted

Now that was funny. :feelskek::feelsokman::feelsokman:
I don't appreciate your religious inclinations but we are buddies forever blenchod, I'll try to stop making you angry :Comfy:
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Gengar
No worries bhaichacho, there was lots of propaganda aimed towards them so I can see why. I'll give you the quick rundown.

- Taliban gets in power in 1996
- Osama bin Laden does 9/11
- Seeks refuge in Afghanistan
- US demands they hand him over
- Taliban wants to solve the issue diplomatically
- US doesn't accept and invades along with NATO
- They oust the Taliban government and install a puppet regime
- From here on out they wage a war against the invaders and those who help them (internal traitors)
- 20 years later Taliban emerges victorious and US & NATO flees

Someone said about this, "If you ever feel useless, remember it took twenty years, trillions of dollars and 4 US Presidents to replace the Taliban with the Taliban." Cagefuel.
The U.S. didn't invade Afghanistan to defeat the Taliban that's just the cover story sold to the public. In reality, the war served as a massive profit engine for defense contractors like Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, and Northrop Grumman who made billions through government contracts over two decades. The longer the war dragged o, the more money flowed into the military industrial complex, aided by a revolving door of officials moving between government roles and defense companies. With over $2 trillion spent and the Taliban returning to power within weeks of the U.S. withdrawal, it's obvious the real objective was never peace or democracy but sustained military presence for profit. They never wanted to end Taliban in the first place. Even senator John McCain admitted this.


@FaceandBBC @Sprinkles @widdi
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: ShowerCelling and FaceandBBC
I don't appreciate your religious inclinations but we are buddies forever blenchod, I'll try to stop making you angry :Comfy:
It's not that I am actually angry, but thanks.:ogre: At worst, I may get annoyed but not actually angry.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Gaygymmaxx
It's not that I am actually angry, but thanks.:ogre: At worst, I may get annoyed but not actually angry.
Ur pfp is gay though ngl :hnghn:
1751594678675
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Gengar
1751594712450

Brutal
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Gaygymmaxx
The U.S. didn't invade Afghanistan to defeat the Taliban that's just the cover story sold to the public. In reality, the war served as a massive profit engine for defense contractors like Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, and Northrop Grumman who made billions through government contracts over two decades. The longer the war dragged o, the more money flowed into the military industrial complex, aided by a revolving door of officials moving between government roles and defense companies. With over $2 trillion spent and the Taliban returning to power within weeks of the U.S. withdrawal, it's obvious the real objective was never peace or democracy but sustained military presence for profit. @FaceandBBC @Sprinkles @widdi
Well, that was definitely one of the factors, but there's more to it than that in this case, some of it is genuine hatred towards them. They've been and still are internationally isolated. Only today did Russia formally recognize the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, the world's first country to do that. Let's see how many more countries follow suit, I hope many.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
The U.S. didn't invade Afghanistan to defeat the Taliban that's just the cover story sold to the public. In reality, the war served as a massive profit engine for defense contractors like Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, and Northrop Grumman who made billions through government contracts over two decades. The longer the war dragged o, the more money flowed into the military industrial complex, aided by a revolving door of officials moving between government roles and defense companies. With over $2 trillion spent and the Taliban returning to power within weeks of the U.S. withdrawal, it's obvious the real objective was never peace or democracy but sustained military presence for profit. @FaceandBBC @Sprinkles @widdi
I’m not too knowledgeable on this topic, but didn’t the CIA also run a massive opium farming operation there? Like legit 19th century British empire tactics
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
I’m not too knowledgeable on this topic, but didn’t the CIA also run a massive opium farming operation there? Like legit 19th century British empire tactics
Yes, that's another factor as well. Taliban had nearly eradicated opium production and as soon as the US invaded, the numbers skyrocketed. :hnghn:
 
  • +1
Reactions: widdi and Gaygymmaxx
No the disliking the religion
Their prophet fucked a 9 year old girl

And @Gengar actually has a better answer than most, the best by far

But the majority of Muslims on this forum will literally just lie, say it didn't happen. Say she was older than 9, say bullshit

Say... women were developed at 9 years old back then :forcedsmile::forcedsmile::forcedsmile:

It's a litmus test

Do you follow bullshit blindly? And they always do.

One nigga told me "who am I to day a 50 year old man fucking a 9 year old is immoral? By what standard?"

Broo? :lul:
 
  • +1
Reactions: The Homelander and Gaygymmaxx
Mogged by Rajevushnujeet from the deepest slums of new delhi
3482881832232212212112

95947377443534
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: rrm_ss2, laworg and 2025cel
  • +1
Reactions: Gaygymmaxx and The Homelander
Yes, that's another factor as well. Taliban had nearly eradicated opium production and as soon as the US invaded, the numbers skyrocketed. :hnghn:
The taliban also persecuted the Bacha bazi pedos who the USA promptly allied with as soon as they invaded. Obv they go too far on the treatment of women but they were actually stopping a lot of really degen shit
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Gengar
Their prophet fucked a 9 year old girl

And @Gengar actually has a better answer than most, the best by far

But the majority of Muslims on this forum will literally just lie, say it didn't happen. Say she was older than 9, say bullshit

Say... women were developed at 9 years old back then :forcedsmile::forcedsmile::forcedsmile:

It's a litmus test

Do you follow bullshit blindly? And they always do.

One nigga told me "who am I to day a 50 year old man fucking a 9 year old is immoral? By what standard?"

Broo? :lul:
Yeah well the marriage of Aisha to the Prophet was culturally normal at the time, accepted by society, caused no harm to her, and she later became one of Islam’s most respected scholars. using it to attack Islam ignores historical facts and context.

Sahih al-Bukhari, Hadith 5133
Aisha narrates her own marriage, showing she was aware and unashamed.


Aisha’s scholarship, She narrated 2,210 hadiths more than most male companions (source: Al-Zurqani, Sharh al-Muwatta

Cultural norms – Historical research (Encyclopedia of Islam, Cambridge History of Islam) shows such ages were common worldwide, not just in Arabia.

No reports from early critics or enemies of the Prophet attacking this marriage so
showing it wasn’t controversial then.

Also 21st century only century to find it so weird among the masses.

Europe:
King Richard II of England (14th century) married a 6-year-old (Isabella of Valois).

Age of consent in England was 12 until the 19th century (source: Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England, 1765).

Byzantine Empire:Girls often married at 12–13, sometimes younger, especially in royal or rural families (source: The Byzantine Family, Margaret Mullett)

Can go on about asia and africa too but no need

Dr. Jonathan A.C. Brown (Georgetown University) explains in “Misquoting Muhammad” that historical age norms were based on biological maturity, not arbitrary numbers.

And last

Aisha’s own father Abu Bakr, and enemies of Islam, had no issue with her marriage if it was abnormal, critics would have attacked it then.
 
  • +1
Reactions: JasGews69x
I’m not too knowledgeable on this topic, but didn’t the CIA also run a massive opium farming operation there? Like legit 19th century British empire tactics
Yeah Taliban had nearly wiped out opium by 2000 calling in unislamic, but after the U.S. invaded, Afghanistan became the world's top producer again,, poppy fields everywhere under the watch of U.S. and NATO forces. The CIA and other agencies were known to work with warlords and militias who profited from the drug trade turning a blind eye in exchange for their support against the Taliban. The entire operation was just a massive scam.
 
  • +1
Reactions: widdi, laworg and Gengar
The taliban also persecuted the Bacha bazi pedos who the USA promptly allied with as soon as they invaded. Obv they go too far on the treatment of women but they were actually stopping a lot of really degen shit
That's actually why they exist, the former Muhajideen warlords were bachabazimaxxing and Mullah Omar wanted to eradicate such degeneracy.

As for women's treatment, I believe they should do as they please, it's their country, it's their rules. It's like when ethnics migrate to the west, we get told, "Follow our rules." And rightly so, it's their [the westerners'] country.
 
  • Woah
Reactions: widdi
The taliban also persecuted the Bacha bazi pedos who the USA promptly allied with as soon as they invaded. Obv they go too far on the treatment of women but they were actually stopping a lot of really degen shit
Kinda confused on taliban and the bond with al qaeda werent they one
 
  • +1
Reactions: laworg
Yeah Taliban had nearly wiped out opium by 2000 calling in unislamic, but after the U.S. invaded, Afghanistan became the world's top producer again,, poppy fields everywhere under the watch of U.S. and NATO forces. The CIA and other agencies were known to work with warlords and militias who profited from the drug trade turning a blind eye in exchange for their support against the Taliban. The entire operation was just a massive scam.
Ts so opium carti ken carson brah
 
Yeah well the marriage of Aisha to the Prophet was culturally normal at the time, accepted by society, caused no harm to her, and she later became one of Islam’s most respected scholars. using it to attack Islam ignores historical facts and context.

Sahih al-Bukhari, Hadith 5133
Aisha narrates her own marriage, showing she was aware and unashamed.


Aisha’s scholarship, She narrated 2,210 hadiths more than most male companions (source: Al-Zurqani, Sharh al-Muwatta

Cultural norms – Historical research (Encyclopedia of Islam, Cambridge History of Islam) shows such ages were common worldwide, not just in Arabia.

No reports from early critics or enemies of the Prophet attacking this marriage so
showing it wasn’t controversial then.

Also 21st century only century to find it so weird among the masses.

Europe:
King Richard II of England (14th century) married a 6-year-old (Isabella of Valois).

Age of consent in England was 12 until the 19th century (source: Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England, 1765).

Byzantine Empire:Girls often married at 12–13, sometimes younger, especially in royal or rural families (source: The Byzantine Family, Margaret Mullett)

Can go on about asia and africa too but no need

Dr. Jonathan A.C. Brown (Georgetown University) explains in “Misquoting Muhammad” that historical age norms were based on biological maturity, not arbitrary numbers.

And last

Aisha’s own father Abu Bakr, and enemies of Islam, had no issue with her marriage if it was abnormal, critics would have attacked it then.
We found another one @Gengar

It's literally a prepuscent child

You'd think a prophet would set norms? Right? Set people on the right path?

do you think it's fine to fuck 9 year olds? You, you personally

if not, how can you justify your prophet just adhering to the times?

Isn't he supposed to set things straight?

Isn't his word the word of God?

SHE PERHAPS JUST HAD HER FIRST PERIOD, AT BEST

At worst. ENTIRELY PREPUBSCENT

IT WAS IMMORAL. A PROPHET SHOULDN'T BE IMMORAL.
 
We found another one @Gengar

It's literally a prepuscent child

You'd think a prophet would set norms? Right? Set people on the right path?

do you think it's fine to fuck 9 year olds? You, you personally

if not, how can you justify your prophet just adhering to the times?

Isn't he supposed to set things straight?

Isn't his word the word of God?

SHE PERHAPS JUST HAD HER FIRST PERIOD, AT BEST

At worst. ENTIRELY PREPUBSCENT

IT WAS IMMORAL. A PROPHET SHOULDN'T BE IMMORAL.
Joever, you're instigating me against other muzzies. I'll stay quiet now. :hnghn:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Gaygymmaxx
As long as your posts do not contain things I disagree with I'll gladly rep. :feelsokman:
But you didn't rep the other one

Meaning... you do agree that fucking 9 year olds is fine?

@FBI take him away. :hnghn:
 
We found another one @Gengar

It's literally a prepuscent child

You'd think a prophet would set norms? Right? Set people on the right path?

do you think it's fine to fuck 9 year olds? You, you personally

if not, how can you justify your prophet just adhering to the times?

Isn't he supposed to set things straight?

Isn't his word the word of God?

SHE PERHAPS JUST HAD HER FIRST PERIOD, AT BEST

At worst. ENTIRELY PREPUBSCENT

IT WAS IMMORAL. A PROPHET SHOULDN'T BE IMMORAL.
I get why it feels wrong now while u didnt know else u were raised todsy it is completely IMPOSSIBLE to change what u think is normal since u were legit born like it. But the Prophet didn’t just ‘adhere to the times’ he actually changed many social norms for the better, like banning female infanticide and improving women’s rights. In 7th-century Arabia and many other cultures, girls reaching puberty (around 9–11:ogre:) was considered adulthood. Aisha wasn’t harmed, became a great scholar, and no one back then called it immoral. Judging history by today’s standards misses how society worked then. Morality has to consider context, not just emotions!!!!
 
I get why it feels wrong now while u didnt know else u were raised todsy it is completely IMPOSSIBLE to change what u think is normal since u were legit born like it. But the Prophet didn’t just ‘adhere to the times’ he actually changed many social norms for the better, like banning female infanticide and improving women’s rights. In 7th-century Arabia and many other cultures, girls reaching puberty (around 9–11:ogre:) was considered adulthood. Aisha wasn’t harmed, became a great scholar, and no one back then called it immoral. Judging history by today’s standards misses how society worked then. Morality has to consider context, not just emotions!!!!
You entirely missed the point

And they reached puberty later than current times, not earlier

Given less industrialization and people were not as well fed, the body's of women in his era were behind those of the current era
 
You entirely missed the point

And they reached puberty later than current times, not earlier

Given less industrialization and people were not as well fed, the body's of women in his era were behind those of the current era
Well acc historical and biological research shows that before modern nutrition and health, girls generally reached puberty later, around 12–14 years old or even older, not earlier. However, some girls could still reach puberty as early as 9–11EVEN TODAY, especially in hot climates or due to genetics. So saying Aisha was ‘just 9 and definitely prepubescent’ is an oversimplification puberty varies widely. Also, the exact age isn’t the only issue; her later role as a respected scholar and leader matters too. (Srry fir bringing this point up the entire time)
 
Well acc historical and biological research shows that before modern nutrition and health, girls generally reached puberty later, around 12–14 years old or even older, not earlier.
That's exactly what I said

Proves my point...
However, some girls could still reach puberty as early as 9–11EVEN TODAY, especially in hot climates or due to genetics. So saying Aisha was ‘just 9 and definitely prepubescent’ is an oversimplification puberty varies widely.
you literally just made it clear that you agree with this part of MY argument
Also, the exact age isn’t the only issue; her later role as a respected scholar and leader matters too. (Srry fir bringing this point up the entire time)
"my dad raped me, but you must consider I became a pro basketballer afterwards"

What the fuck are you talking about

@Gengar look at this second point

Like what the fuck 🤣🤣🤣🤣

This what I'm talking about
 
@laworg you brutally failed the litmus test

"You must consider she became a scholar afterwards"

Why? Why would I have to consider that? :lul:

Holy fuck
 
@laworg you brutally failed the litmus test

"You must consider she became a scholar afterwards"

Why? Why would I have to consider that? :lul:

Holy fuck
The reason Aisha’s later role as a scholar matters isn’t to justify the marriage, but to show that she was NOT harmed or exploited as some claim. Her respected position in Islamic history indicates the relationship wasn’t abusive or damaging.

So the key is understanding the difference between the marriage contract age and when the marriage was actually consummated
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5521.jpeg
    IMG_5521.jpeg
    405.9 KB · Views: 0
Her respected position in Islamic history indicates the relationship wasn’t abusive or damaging.
No it doesn't :lul::lul::lul:

You were told this. And now you're saying it

There is no critical thinking going on right now.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: laworg
No it doesn't :lul::lul::lul:

You were told this. And now you're saying it

There is no critical thinking going on right now.
I mean idk what u want me to say if u wont accept documented history lol im not tryna change ur mind here
Sahih al-Bukhari, Hadith 6136)
 
  • +1
Reactions: jeff1234
just be a retarded shitskin theory
 
Surprisingly afghans are the most beautiful people I have ever seen, they and Tajiks mog. Iranians are 50/50
 

Similar threads

L
Replies
5
Views
79
RODEBLUR
RODEBLUR
ScientificLooksmax
Replies
16
Views
241
obscuredusk
obscuredusk
psychomandible
Replies
13
Views
342
kurd
kurd
pfl
Replies
38
Views
572
RODEBLUR
RODEBLUR
Thinking_CEL
Replies
14
Views
176
AustrianMogger
AustrianMogger

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top