TALL AND SKINNY VS SHORT AND MUSCULAR?

[Deleted member 28398]

Which you picking,

On the taller side (6'2+) but with a small bone structure, and very slim naturally
And difficulty putting on weight

Or short (5'8 and below), with a muscular frame

 

[Reformed]

Short and skinny

 

[zharupodrugu]

Taller is better. Weight can be gained easily, meanwhile height can be changed only by brutal LL , easily -100k$ and 3 years of life. Hardgainer is a myth created by dyels that cant eat and lift properly

 

[Deleted member 24789]

Tall tbh

At least i can become an eco+ (wish version of) @Arborist one day

 

[Deleted member 28691]

you should pick short and muscular you want to be 5'9 perfect heroic proportions practical in bed height.

like Stallone.

 

[Orc]

I'm already tall and spindly as fuck.

 

[vanillaicecream]

Here come the boring and dumb "all you need to do is put on weight if you're skinny" answers

It's it obvious that the purpose of questions like this is to determine which one is better without assuming which would be in a better position to looksmax. It's just tall and skinny vs short and muscular, period. No assumptions and considerations beyond this. With that said, I'll take tall and skinny, all day.

 

[autistic_tendencies]

height is eveything

 

[Deleted member 25198]

Tall and muscular

 

[Deleted member 28691]

I'm already tall and spindly as fuck.

very unfortunate.

you need torso shortening and leg shortening to achieve the godly 5'9 proportions practical in bed height.

be like Stallone and exude girthy cock vibe.

@Marsik

 

[Orc]

very unfortunate.

you need torso shortening and leg shortening to achieve the godly 5'9 proportions practical in bed height.

be like Stallone and exude girthy cock vibe.

@Marsik

brutally over for me, need neck reduction too, this is ideal.

 

[Deleted member 28691]

brutally over for me, need neck reduction too, this is ideal.

This is too much.

You need a neck bit thick nothing too much.

𝕳𝖊 𝖜𝖍𝖔 𝖎𝖘 𝖘𝖙𝖆𝖑𝖑𝖔𝖓𝖊𝖕𝖎𝖑𝖑𝖊𝖉 𝖎𝖘 𝖜𝖎𝖘𝖊 𝖇𝖊𝖞𝖔𝖓𝖉 𝖆𝖑𝖑 𝖒𝖊𝖆𝖘𝖚𝖗𝖊.