Tall skulls

[MLGS0LD1ERB0Y]

Bare with me, reason being this may be a a super retarded question, but users here always say how tall skulls mog and are super ideal, but doesn’t that also just mean a lower and unideal fwhr? I’m asking because I have a tall skull and a quite unideal fwhr.
Thanks.

 

[tomacōck]

tall in proportion
this is mostly said in regards to tfwhr

 

[ZyzzReincarnate]

do you base your understanding of attractiveness on what users here say or on an actual understanding of aesthetics?

 

[MulletM1chas]

Bare with me, reason being this may be a a super retarded question, but users here always say how tall skulls mog and are super ideal, but doesn’t that also just mean a lower and unideal fwhr? I’m asking because I have a tall skull and a quite unideal fwhr.
Thanks.

idk goated pfp kevin is tuff

 

[MLGS0LD1ERB0Y]

do you base your understanding of attractiveness on what users here say or on an actual understanding of aesthetics?

Half half really. I’m still learning new things in terms of aesthetics every day. Why?

 

[MLGS0LD1ERB0Y]

idk goated pfp kevin is tuff

Appreciate it dude

 

[EmperorVon]

You don’t have a tall skull you have a long skull, tall skull just means more rectangular with still good structure it’s actually more masculine than having a shorter skull

 

[MLGS0LD1ERB0Y]

You don’t have a tall skull you have a long skull, tall skull just means more rectangular with still good structure it’s actually more masculine than having a shorter skull

I have a rectangular face shape. Does that mean anything? What’s the different between tall and long. Is long more narrow?

 

[EmperorVon]

I have a rectangular face shape. Does that mean anything? What’s the different between tall and long. Is long more narrow?

Long is like Ross Geller from friends a horse face, tall skull is more like Gabriel Aubrey

 

[.dunkbro]

tall skulls are a cope, its a narrow face

 

[ZyzzReincarnate]

Half half really. I’m still learning new things in terms of aesthetics every day. Why?

I have a tall skull and a quite unideal fwhr.

you answered your own question then. and i dont mean that in an insulting way, but in a way that might change the trajectory of your perspective from going in the direction of whatever Joined2024-2025 forum retards say towards a more realistic POV.

think about how many people here are against gym and physique for example. a lot of people go as far to say that physique/height/frame/appeal/etc doesnt affect your rating in the decile scale (ltn, mtn, htn, etc) but that is the furthest thing from the truth. a person with an MTN face who is 6'5 with a top tier frame, shredded, with an awesome physique is NOT an MTN in real life in any case. I can tell you from my own perspective from this transformation:

most people rate me ltn/mtn because of my face but I slay like no tomorrow due to being 6'3, appealmaxxed, gymmaxed, framemaxxed, and frauding with hair/beard/etc in order to boost my perceived attractiveness (female gaze) much higher than what autistic 2022-presentcel users believe i am due to their autistic warped perception of attraction.

look at your own face, harmony, and analyze your results with women + how you are received by people generally in society. pay attention to how different faces are treated differently IRL. you'll know what is true and what isnt based on what you learn in PSL about aesthetics then apply IRL observations to this

 

[MLGS0LD1ERB0Y]

you answered your own question then. and i dont mean that in an insulting way, but in a way that might change the trajectory of your perspective from going in the direction of whatever Joined2024-2025 forum retards say towards a more realistic POV.

think about how many people here are against gym and physique for example. a lot of people go as far to say that physique/height/frame/appeal/etc doesnt affect your rating in the decile scale (ltn, mtn, htn, etc) but that is the furthest thing from the truth. a person with an MTN face who is 6'5 with a top tier frame, shredded, with an awesome physique is NOT an MTN in real life in any case. I can tell you from my own perspective from this transformation:

View attachment 4541501View attachment 4541502

most people rate me ltn/mtn because of my face but I slay like no tomorrow due to being 6'3, appealmaxxed, gymmaxed, framemaxxed, and frauding with hair/beard/etc in order to boost my perceived attractiveness (female gaze) much higher than what autistic 2022-presentcel users believe i am due to their autistic warped perception of attraction.

Appreciate this reply man, I’ve always had the idea that physique/frame plays a huge role in your overall rating, so this just further verifies it I guess. Also, mirin ascension, I wouldn’t say you’re MTN, but higher. Glad you’re slaying now dude.

 

[ZyzzReincarnate]

Appreciate this reply man, I’ve always had the idea that physique/frame plays a huge role in your overall rating, so this just further verifies it I guess. Also, mirin ascension, I wouldn’t say you’re MTN, but higher. Glad you’re slaying now dude.

my face is MTN at best by the standards of this community, alas i couldnt rate myself HTN or anything higher without getting a million retards criticizing lacking departments in my facial aesthetics despite the fact that i'll be fucking girls that laughed away at someone shorter and weaker than me whos facial aesthetics mog mine to death. PSL ratings (1-8, with 8 being practically nonexistent w only super models) are applied to face ONLY whereas decile scale ratings like ltn mtn htn IMO take into account an entire package.

its the same reason that girls could say a photo of me on a bodybuilding stage is disgusting but see me walking on the beach and be like WOW his body!!!!!!!!!!!!! JFL and that is basically 'water is wet' around here. same should be applied to attraction. female gaze > autistic forum users all day. autistic forum users only serve the purpose of attention to detail and room to improve.

 

[maxinhib]

Bare with me, reason being this may be a a super retarded question, but users here always say how tall skulls mog and are super ideal, but doesn’t that also just mean a lower and unideal fwhr? I’m asking because I have a tall skull and a quite unideal fwhr.
Thanks.

I think saying “tall skull mogs” is referring to people who have ideal ratios and development, but with slight flaws. like you mentioned their facial height could be too long relative to the width, or/paired with a long forehead gives the “tall” skull look, but overall they have a harmonious appearance.

 

[MLGS0LD1ERB0Y]

my face is MTN at best by the standards of this community, alas i couldnt rate myself HTN or anything higher without getting a million retards criticizing lacking departments in my facial aesthetics despite the fact that i'll be fucking girls that laughed away at someone shorter and weaker than me whos facial aesthetics mog mine to death. PSL ratings (1-8, with 8 being practically nonexistent w only super models) are applied to face ONLY whereas decile scale ratings like ltn mtn htn IMO take into account an entire package.

its the same reason that girls could say a photo of me on a bodybuilding stage is disgusting but see me walking on the beach and be like WOW his body!!!!!!!!!!!!! JFL and that is basically 'water is wet' around here. same should be applied to attraction. female gaze > autistic forum users all day. autistic forum users only serve the purpose of attention to detail and room to improve.

But I always think that autistic forum users know what the beauty and PSL standards are in terms of facial aesthetics which is why I listen to high IQ users on here (with good reputation). Although, it does sound stupid because we should be working to satisfy female gaze I guess.

Als I forgot to ask, did you undergo any surgery to get that way, or was it all softmaxxes?