D
Deleted member 30037
Scholar
- Joined
- May 22, 2023
- Posts
- 5,316
- Reputation
- 7,336
- OP
- #101
"WASHINGTON – A new EWG analysis of serums and essences, popularized by Korean beauty, or K-Beauty, finds that about 40 percent of the products were formulated with less hazardous ingredients. U.S. sales of K-beauty products have increased by almost 300 percent in the past two years alone."more products ≠ more harmful, would fentanyl applied topically also be better than korean skincare since it is just one chemical? do you see why this argument makes no sense
So 60% are less hazardous, but guess what, still hazardous.
Less Expensive K-Beauty Skincare Products Score Green
A new EWG analysis of serums and essences, popularized by Korean beauty, or K-Beauty, finds that about 40 percent of the products were formulated with less hazardous ingredients. U.S. sales of K-beauty products have increased by almost 300 percent in the past two years alone.
www.ewg.org
And using fentanyl is a ridiculous example. I'm talking about clinically tested skincare products. So yes, using 10+ chemical based products is 100% more harmful than one or two. It's common sense.