Tattoos on women are pathological and unattractive.

If high class to you means merely financial upper class, I agree with you. But what you really mean is the new rich, i.e. degenerates.

High Class = Wealth + political power, which used to be the aristocracy. Where most will not have tattoos, except for the very new generations.
I’m talking about girls who come from families that run international businesses in the hundreds of millions, not your daily peasant that earns barely above average wage
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 22354
I’m talking about girls who come from families that run international businesses in the hundreds of millions, not your daily peasant that earns barely above average wage
Rich doesn't have to be high class at all. Look at rappers and influencers. These people are rich but degenerate and decadent.
 
I’m talking about girls who come from families that run international businesses in the hundreds of millions, not your daily peasant that earns barely above average wage
Then you're right, but that's still usually just the nouveau riche. This is not old money (but even there you will find tattoos nowadays :feelsbadman:).
 
If high class to you means merely financial upper class, I agree with you. But what you really mean is the new rich, i.e. degenerates.

High Class = Wealth + political power, which used to be the aristocracy. Where most will not have tattoos, except for the new generations.
Imagine thinking guys here will even meet girls from this echelon
 
  • +1
Reactions: infini
muh low-class, muh red flags, muh looksmin, muh harmful, muh youthfulness yet would still smash land whales...

Meanwhile, all yet not having a single touch of a woman's tattooed skin.

View attachment 1988007View attachment 1987978

You were really invested in Natalie Dormers' side view or Angelina Jolie's shoulder blades before the ink wasn't you son? You would all envy having this view in real life wrapped across your cock.

Do you want to hold on that idealistic thought of entitled mental gymnastics if you can doggystyle this,
View attachment 1988000View attachment 1988014

or have this reverse - cowgirl view leverage and sink all the way into ultimate stimuli?

View attachment 1988024View attachment 1988028View attachment 1988029

Or even on a base level being in the same personal space as this entity walking around you?
View attachment 1988032

No, because your inhibition doesn't even have shit on them for a starter.

Have an actual taste that's unique and stop comparing standards to other normie sheep on here because it's deemed cool to.

You either moan about how women have an elite sheep-like criteria mentality or the other side in being the girl with the dragon tattoo stereotype who's closer to the person you wish to be and you would trade lives with Stephen James in a heartbeat.

Remember kids. Art has more inherent worth than most human lives.

View attachment 1987998

@Anstrum95 @mightyravendark @6ft4 @forevergymcelling @averagejoe @Prettyboy @Lev Peshkov

I strongly dislike tattoos, very few tattoos are acceptable

I don't wanna see some skulls,cats,rodents,insects,plants, angry wolfs teeth or whatever on a womans body, ideally she should have no tattoos and look soft and pure

and if they have too much ink on themselves it looks like necrosis(dead skin) I am not into necrophilia :oops:
 
  • +1
Reactions: p0lishsubhuman and Chinlet Ascension
Tattoos on women repulse me.

Women are valued for their youthfulness and intactness, which are both signs of good health and fertility. Tattoos destroy this value.

Women who look like they've "been through a lot" (tattoos, scars, stretch marks,...) are inherently unattractive.

Why do some women feel the need to ruin their beautiful smooth and uniform skin with tattoos then?

Mental illness. The very concept of purpousefully damaging your skin and disturbing its uniformity is pathological and repulsing to a mentally healthy individual. Tattoos are a form of self-harm.

Tattoos make women seem used. Even those little ones. It's disgusting.

@Dr. Mog @krisal @justshower @ike57 @ascension! @Shitfacegoodbod=mog @Rate_My_Face @anticel
its water except the stretch marks, stretch marks can happen naturally when go too quickly early on the life and pregnancy, usually they fade and become skin colour so it is very hard to notice them unlike tattoos which are also self inflicted
 
I strongly dislike tattoos, very few tattoos are acceptable

I don't wanna see some skulls,cats,rodents,insects,plants, angry wolfs teeth or whatever on a womans body, ideally she should have no tattoos and look soft and pure

and if they have too much ink on themselves it looks like necrosis(dead skin) I am not into necrophilia :oops:
Look into the Instagram link for an Asian touch.
 
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 16474
Imagine thinking guys here will even meet girls from this echelon
Not even my example earlier with Angelina Jolie, hell Natalie Dormer can crack through their boring skulls. Was almost gonna include princesses and Cara Delevingne whose tattoos are on the minimalist side yet has elite family background but I didn't want to drown them when not all tattoo artists are equal.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 23778
Not even my example earlier with Angelina Jolie, hell Natalie Dormer can crack through their boring skulls. Was almost gonna include princesses and Cara Delevigne whose tattoos are on the minimalist side yet has elite family background but I didn't want to drown them.
What's funny is guys think that girls looking "pure" somehow means anything. The "purest" angel is a gigaslut for a guy she deems worth doing it for.
 
What's funny is guys think that girls looking "pure" somehow means anything. The "purest" angel is a gigaslut for a guy she deems worth doing it for.
Something like this in their mind:
 
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 23778
Rich doesn't have to be high class at all. Look at rappers and influencers. These people are rich but degenerate and decadent.
They would still lead high people class to them into I dunno, investing in style? Just leagues above your comprehension.
 
Check the account out back here. Korean tattoo artist. You might be into abstract, brutalist or industrial.
cba google failed to find me the account but I watched google images

1670612218228
1670612231910
1670612248545


they would look much better doing no tattoos and notice that they don't tattoo their most precious thing: face

they look like stitches on skin

1670612358368



there are 10000x better alternatives like lingerie clothing which actually are classy and beautiful, notice they don't have animal, insect or skull shapes in them. and they are not permanent

1670612596127
1670612846065
1670612855238
1670612887821
 
  • +1
Reactions: p0lishsubhuman and Chinlet Ascension
cba google failed to find me the account but I watched google images

View attachment 1988241View attachment 1988242View attachment 1988243

they would look much better doing no tattoos and notice that they don't tattoo their most precious thing: face

they look like stitches on skin

View attachment 1988251


there are 10000x better alternatives like lingerie clothing which actually are classy and beautiful, notice they don't have animal, insect or skull shapes in them. and they are not permanent

View attachment 1988255View attachment 1988263View attachment 1988264View attachment 1988265
Cba to press back? lmao

That's because those examples are all the same cliches just like the lingerie.

Try this then
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 16474
Cba to press back? lmao

That's because those examples are all the same cliches just like the lingerie.

Try this then
most of it looks like the stuff I drew in the middle school classes cus I was bored

but I don't like a single one on a human body, yeah tattoos are pretty cringe,

unrelated to the instagram but related to tattoos

Tattooed soy


blood type tattoo Is good for doctors to get info tho
 
most of it looks like the stuff I drew in the middle school classes cus I was bored
and yet you've never seen it on somebody until now it's ironic in a way but it's how aesthetics come about sometimes.
 
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 16474
and yet you've never seen it on somebody until now it's ironic in a way but it's how aesthetics come about sometimes.
if people wanna donate their bodies to be some artists "art piece" then go ahead I would personally not wanna get tic tac toe'd

some people go full body matte black, mirin necrosismaxx looksmin

1670615709027
1670615717091


I just see no appeal and no point
 
  • JFL
Reactions: infini
if people wanna donate their bodies to be some artists "art piece" then go ahead I would personally not wanna get tic tac toe'd

some people go full body matte black, mirin necrosismaxx looksmin

View attachment 1988325View attachment 1988326

I just see no appeal and no point
If Louis Theroux decided to Lovecraftmaxx I would get it. It's easier for average and below to use introductory kitsch-level tattoos to boost SMV. The way I see it for above average looking people is they need to pick and choose carefully an equally higher quality artist.
 
Last edited:
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 16474
Tattoos are a looksmin for everyone who doesn't have a fetish. That's what a fetish is: An attraction to something that isn't human.

Just lol at Jolie being such a whore for (((Hollywood))) that she gets Jewish esoteric symbols carved into her very skin. She has to be completely brainwashed to not recognize that as humiliating.

Dormer would look much better without the tats as well.

Do you want to hold on that idealistic thought of entitled mental gymnastics if you can doggystyle this,
View attachment 1988000View attachment 1988014

or have this reverse - cowgirl view leverage and sink all the way into ultimate stimuli?

View attachment 1988024View attachment 1988028View attachment 1988029

Or even on a base level being in the same personal space as this entity walking around you?
View attachment 1988032

No, because your inhibition doesn't even have shit on them for a starter.
This is an English-speaking forum. Learn to speak English.

Have an actual taste that's unique and stop comparing standards to other normie sheep on here because it's deemed cool to.
This is what all tattoo people think of themselves: They're so UnIqUe and AlTeRnAtIvE. Maybe that was true in 1995. Tattoos are completely mainstream now. You're not interesting, bro, not at all. You're a cliche.
 
Tattoos are a looksmin for everyone who doesn't have a fetish. That's what a fetish is: An attraction to something that isn't human.


Just lol at Jolie being such a whore for (((Hollywood))) that she gets Jewish esoteric symbols carved into her very skin. She has to be completely brainwashed to not recognize that as humiliating.

Dormer would look much better without the tats as well.


This is an English-speaking forum. Learn to speak English.


This is what all tattoo people think of themselves: They're so UnIqUe and AlTeRnAtIvE. Maybe that was true in 1995. Tattoos are completely mainstream now. You're not interesting, bro, not at all. You're a cliche.
Wonder what your agenda was when writing all of this shit because it's far beyond what I would consider worrying about.

Tattoos aren't a fetish, the same way art isn't.

Learn to read English, you appeared to evidently respond back to me generously, ironic isn't it? Even still, for you to say that would mean my examples were unique yet you're here having no shred of a user profile. Tell me my tattoo examples gave a response without telling me they gave a response.

Receiving a wall of text such as that, on a Saturday night in your prime meanwhile tattooed people are enjoying their lives.

It's bad cause it's MaInStReAm now, lmao
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 22354
Tattoos aren't a fetish, the same way art isn't.
It's exactly the same. People don't like art because they're sexually aroused by it. If they were, that would be a fetish.

Learn to read English, you appeared to evidently respond back to me generously, ironic isn't it?
I've been reading English my whole life and I can tell that this sentence is a complete mess.

Even still, for you to say that would mean my examples were unique yet you're here having no shred of a user profile. Tell me my tattoo examples gave a response without telling me they gave a response.
I have no idea what this is supposed to mean.

Receiving a wall of text such as that, on a Saturday night in your prime meanwhile tattooed people are enjoying their lives.
I typed a few sentences, you tard. See also: "time zones"

It's bad cause it's MaInStReAm now, lmao
Every time I've ever pointed this out to a tattoo person, they've gotten pissy. Every time. They all want to think they're aLtErNaTiVe and CrEaTiVe. No, you're not.
 
It's exactly the same. People don't like art because they're sexually aroused by it. If they were, that would be a fetish.
Another loser opinion. Yeah, I'm really not gonna be sexual to the same person if they weren't inked except they are, lmao.
I've been reading English my whole life and I can tell that this sentence is a complete mess.

I have no idea what this is supposed to mean.
Yeah exactly.

Okay, I didn't probably link to the former post because I assumed you were able to follow what last visual examples I'm referring to. Yet go on to admit...
Every time I've ever pointed this out to a tattoo person, they've gotten pissy. Every time. They all want to think they're aLtErNaTiVe and CrEaTiVe. No, you're not.
Some are. Most creatives aren't, and yet are using mainstream examples because they make a profit and are a portfolio to show range, if you can't see that obviously yet give autistic standards about 1995 then this convo is over. Having a style is the same with any creative medium in which it takes a keen eye and hands which is where actual alternative, unique, individual thought-provoking magic happens.

So seeing the examples I gave on the last page and are trying to now make out you didn't get any response lmao.

You are contradicting hard.
 
Last edited:
Another loser opinion.
I listed the definition of "fetish." You don't know what an opinion is.

Some are. Most creatives aren't, and yet are using mainstream examples because they make a profit and are a portfolio to show range, if you can't see that obviously yet give autistic standards about 1995 then this convo is over. Having a style is the same with any creative medium in which it takes a keen eye and hands which is where actual alternative, unique, individual thought-provoking magic happens.
The "style" doesn't matter. Heterosexual men are attracted to women: Their hair, their skin, and so on. If you are attracted to something that is no natural part of a woman, which cannot grow on a woman in any circumstance, then you have a fetish.

So seeing the examples I gave on the last page and are trying to now make out you didn't get any response lmao.

You are contradicting hard.
More shitty incoherent attempts at English.
 
I listed the definition of "fetish." You don't know what an opinion is.


The "style" doesn't matter. Heterosexual men are attracted to women: Their hair, their skin, and so on. If you are attracted to something that is no natural part of a woman, which cannot grow on a woman in any circumstance, then you have a fetish.


More shitty incoherent attempts at English.
More seething yet still responding, proving what an opinion is you stone-dead boring fuck.

And jfl at your excuse for fetish. Might as well say looksmaxxing is a fetish since many of those areas can't grow.

You cba to apply the correct context from the quotes, using English as the straw over what's really relevant. Again, tell me that those images I shared gave an impression even when you don't want to admit it.

 
More seething yet still responding, proving what an opinion is you stone-dead boring fuck.
I really don't mind responding. Doing this tryhard "bUt YoU'rE sTiLl ReSpOnDiNg" thing doesn't mean anything to me. You're responding as well, so who cares? You can look through my posts and find plenty of times I've responded to arguments that I think are dumb.

What does "stone dead" mean?

And jfl at your excuse for fetish. Might as well say looksmaxxing is a fetish since many of those areas can't grow.
People talk about things like jaw surgery, implants, and fillers here. Jaws and cheekbones and facial bones are all natural. We can do unnatural things to them, but these modificatons only look good if they could pass as natural. That's different from tattoos, which make your natural skin look like something completely unnatural.

You cba to apply the correct context from the quotes, using English as the straw over what's really relevant.
Don't know what "the straw over what's really relevant" means. That's not an English phrase.

Again, tell me that those images I shared gave an impression even when you don't want to admit it.
All of these women would look better with no tattoos.
 
  • +1
Reactions: p0lishsubhuman and Deleted member 16474
What about something more gentle like this ?
View attachment 1986684
The tattoo industry has been CORRUPTED by our COMMON ENEMY, fags, liberals and whores!
Tattoos are /OUR/ art now! :feelsgah::feelsahh::feelsautistic::feelsyay:
Most women I know with "cross" tattoos are hedonistic narcissistic whores, JFL.
I can tolerate some small tattoos but it's probably a sign of bad things to come.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: p0lishsubhuman, Deleted member 22126 and ThousandCuts
Tattoos look great on men for the same reasons they're repulsive on women. They primarily signal risk taking behaviour , low inhibition and experience - all traits that women find attractive on men.
Yeah, but soyboys all have tattoos now. Soyboys and hipsters.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chinlet Ascension
Most women I know with "cross" tattoos are hedonistic narcissistic whores, JFL.
I can tolerate some small tattoos but it's probably a sign of bad things to come.
1670947226365
 
  • JFL
Reactions: p0lishsubhuman and Schizoidcel
Yeah, but soyboys all have tattoos now. Soyboys and hipsters.
Soyboys with tattoos are dark tryad maxxing because having a tattoo is risk taking behavior like @BoneDensity said.

But on the other hand when you have a national socialist that's on a watchlist by the feds, that is doxxed and about to have his house burned down by antifa anyday, no longer has freedom of speech and will probably end up in prison and get assraped by nogs.
When that kind of RISK-TAKING guy has a huge SWASTIKA tattoo on his chest to show off his RISK-TAKING BEHAVIOR then why aren't the women squirting already from this much dark tryad???

What happened to dark tryad and risk-taking behavior about tattoos? @BoneDensity ???
 
Soyboys with tattoos are dark tryad maxxing because having a tattoo is risk taking behavior like @BoneDensity said.

But on the other hand when you have a national socialist that's on a watchlist by the feds, that is doxxed and about to have his house burned down by antifa anyday, no longer has freedom of speech and will probably end up in prison and get assraped by nogs.
When that kind of RISK-TAKING guy has a huge SWASTIKA tattoo on his chest to show off his RISK-TAKING BEHAVIOR then why aren't the women squirting already from this much dark tryad???

What happened to dark tryad and risk-taking behavior about tattoos? @BoneDensity ???
It's not a risk taking thing to get tattoos now.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ThousandCuts
It's not a risk taking thing to get tattoos now.
To have a swastika tattoo is indeed risky because you can lose your job for example but that doesn't make women wet.
see?
 
To have a swastika tattoo is indeed risky because you can lose your job for example but that doesn't make women wet.
see?
Depends on the guy wearing the tattoo. Sure, if you're an awkward little nerd with a swastika you're not gonna make anyone wet.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: ThousandCuts
Depends on the guy wearing the tattoo. Sure, if you're an awkward little nerd with a swastika you're not gonna make anyone wet.
AH GOT'EEEEM :feelshah:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 12002
Or if modern 304's wear "cross" jewelery, that's often another red flag




Imagine showing off your nipples through your clothes (muh "stop sexualizing me") and being shocked when low inhib moggers send you dick pics JFL
 
Yeah they do make them look trashy. But its also a good thing bc it points out the sluts and easier sex.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Schizoidcel
Or if modern 304's wear "cross" jewelery, that's often another red flag

Imagine showing off your nipples through your clothes (muh "stop sexualizing me") and being shocked when low inhib moggers send you dick pics JFL
I don't consider women human beings on a spiritual level.
Freedom is the biggest redflag of them all.
Repeal the 19th and the rest of it.
Natural selection is no longer getting rid of toxic women for us anymore nor soyboys.
Hopefully we have smart people on here researching gene editing.
1671269307146
 

Similar threads

dreamcake1mo
Replies
96
Views
22K
iam good boy
iam good boy
H
Replies
40
Views
4K
RODEBLUR
RODEBLUR

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top