That’s a myth. Modern preachers say that in order to gain the sympathy of feminist western people, there is no proof that says that they are also the majority in paradise, it’s simply a modern theory / philosophy that’s behind spread
Modern preacers dont car3 about femnism
Mogs my SecularIslamist background.
Muhammad was a full blown pedo not just into JBs
Secularism is kufr. Anyone that upholds secularism is a kafir unless he was ignorant or mentally incapacitated.
Hello,
Hello,
I agree. But the only Islamic political body I see as having legitimacy is a caliphate. Even though I have no idea what that would look like in a modern world JFL.
Hamza is a based Muslim too
The monarchy is also valid and legitimate and there can only be 1 caliphate at one point.
I don't see monarchy as recommended but it was the default outside of the Rashidun caliphate - which even according to prophecy was supposed to last approximately 30 days. Every other caliphate/sultanate was monarchical in nature.
I think it's mainly because people think Islamic Shariah will start some kind of utopia in their country when that is not the case. There will be slow growth because many forms of market tools are not available due to the nature of their contracts. I don't know much about this topic as I haven't consulted my teacher on this matter too in depth but I do know some things that he judged like interest, riba, fiat, crypto, etc... I might make a future post on this matter but I fear the same thing as my teacher when it comes to this.
Child marriage is also allowed in other religions but they usually wait until puberty at least.
Who is this 'teacher'? Your local JFL - just consult him issues on everyday life lmao.
I wouldn't make takfir on any Muslim rule. But Taliban are reactionary, have their thinking rooted in deobandism which promotes blind imitation. This is a south Asian movement that has heavy presence in Afghanistan/Pakistan so idc tbh.
Jews don't but Christians do, apparently.
Was aleikoum Salam brother
Christians have to wait until puberty
Yeah this is a takfiri mentality and has more in common with the khairijee than Islam. The same mentality which even accused the prophet of not abiding by the laws of God. Are you salafi?
Nobody is mujtahid mutlaq outside the four imams of those schools. But there NEEDS to be a modern ijtihad movement which is against the secular progressives as well as the backward salafi movement.
'wrongful takfir' and you just made takfir yourself based on rulers not implementing the 'right' thing lmao. He ALSO takfired rulers btw and not people en masse. We shouldnt judge political rulers by the same standard that we demand from scholars.
I am Ashari so no. Also, this is commonplace in the 4 madhabs from what I know.
The Prophets are free from their accusations as they cannot sin.
Salafis thrive partially because of the sunnis gatekeeping knowledge. I've met sufis on a discord server (razaviyah) who literally were not willing to give pdfs to good books all because we weren't studying under a teacher.
His group killed and takfired Asharis/Maturidis from what I know.
You cannot send your Muslim brother to be killed or mistreated by the kuffar in hopes of avoiding an invasion. Allah is the one that gives and takes.
I was talking about an instance when someone approached the prophet and accused him of not following through on his principles - can't remember the story I think it's in ibn Ishaq
I'm not against all Salafis some of them are decent and very knowledgeable. It's a broad spectrum the first ever salafis like Mohammed Abdul and Jamal al-Afghani were very cucked but they did try to revive the Muslim world.
There are always differences in fiqh and always will be. You mentioned slavery - you know that's been abolished via ijma.
Bin Laden was living amongst Maturidi Hanfis. Also this is nice romantic thinking but practice and overall good (maslaha) takes precedence. Funilly enough many salafis are proponents of istihsan in areas of shariah
This is not true. At all. Ijmaa says the opposite.
Yes but that was only for the time being, now we ban it straight up and without any care about doing it in stages. If the ruler says Alcohol is allowed (Which means halal) then he is a kafir.
Maslahah does not mean you can send your Muslim brother out to die in the hands of the kuffar. The life of a Muslim is greater than the life of a kafir. https://sunnah.com/bukhari:3047
I wouldn't say this is true. If he was a tool then America really bet its money on the wrong horse. We do not care if he is or isn't the reason for the invasion, all we care about is halal and haram and what he did was mostly halal except for 9/11 and him killing women and children + suicide bombing is haram or suicide in any manner so 9/11 is really another big haram.
What are you talking about? You're saying the majority of scholars approve of slavery?
That's the flexibility of the shariah by the same token even tobacco should be haram via qiyas but scholars are too lenient in their application.
Stop quoting random hadiths. Bin laden was a liability, you don't plunge the entire country into a war. He should've been extradited to America to face justice over there as he committed a crime in their lands.
Then why didn't he promote violence against Taliban? He was upset with their sufi practices too. It was at his thinking that the Taliban destroyed the Bayamin Buddhist statues - which were there for thousands of years and Muslims didn't do anything about it and no one was really worshipping them anyway.
Some scholars justify suicide bombings - not saying they're right but they see it as martyrdom and not on par with suicide in the traditional sense but going to war and dying.
Yes.
Tobacco is not haram in any madhab. The scholars today who say its haram don't understand it, are ignorant, or in their own perverted self-interest they think banning tobacco is good. The last one is kufr and makes them a kafir if such is the case.
We cannot make takfir of Bin Laden. Why do you think it is random? It clearly says a Muslim cannot be punished for killing a kafir so we cant punish him by sending him to the USA where we know what will happen to him.
There is nothing wrong with this. Neither from the Salafi nor the Sufi side. Because Sufism is detached from fiqh and does not affect fiqh.
They're wrong then. The problem with that comparison is that you literally kill yourself by your own means whereas going into a situation where there is a high likelihood of dying, there's a chance you can come out alive.
Stop lying weirdo. Aisha wasn’t a child.
No they don't. Don't be ignorant.
That's a bad analogy. Living in a polluted society or being obese - the former is something inevitable and collectively responsible. The latter is personal responsibility and a consequence of lack of self control when eating which is something all humans must do. There is no reason to smoke other than to harm yourself.
He killed innocent people doesn't matter. If a Muslim commits a crime he is responsible irrespective of where or who he commited it against.
I was saying it was there for thousands of years and only at the behest of a salafi they destroyed it.
You really can't accept another juristic opinion can you?
Not all Jurist opinions are equal, some opinions are strong by use of their argument.
She was 6 when he married her.
No she wasn’t. She was in her early teens at the earliest.
I read in those days they started counting age after you hit puberty.
Cope, she was 6 and he banged her at 9
Keep projecting your pedo fantasies, retard.
Keep denying your so called prophet is a pedo
Keep coping weirdo.
