test at 15

veryown

veryown

Iron
Joined
May 11, 2025
Posts
115
Reputation
99
how do you genuinely safely run test at 15 without nuking natural production, and is test actually worth it/a good looksmax compared to something like gh
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: abzz! and Nutsack2000
500 mg test E per week (250mg/ml x2)
aromasin 6.25mg per day on 2-3 week of pinning day
if your testicles starts getting smaller, use hcg in the last 3-5 weeks of a cycle, 500iu monday 500iu thursday
pct after 2 week nolvadex 20mgx50 one daily.
 
  • +1
Reactions: KellSS and veryown
how do you genuinely safely run test at 15 without nuking natural production, and is test actually worth it/a good looksmax compared to something like gh
using exogenous testosterone at age 15 is impossible to do safely without suppressing natural production because any dose sufficient for lm effects will disrupt the still-developing hpg axis, gh or igf-1 secretagogues are scientifically superior for bone growth and vertical development at this stage
 
  • +1
Reactions: reyalsnoom and veryown
500 mg test E per week (250mg/ml x2)
aromasin 6.25mg per day on 2-3 week of pinning day
if your testicles starts getting smaller, use hcg in the last 3-5 weeks of a cycle, 500iu monday 500iu thursday
pct after 2 week nolvadex 20mgx50 one daily.
this protocol completely disregards the long-term risks of hpta axis suppression in a 15-year-old, the 500 mg weekly testosterone e dosage is highly excessive, while the nolvadex pct is inadequate to restore gonadal function after such prolonged pubertal suppression.
 
how do you genuinely safely run test at 15 without nuking natural production, and is test actually worth it/a good looksmax compared to something like gh
Everyone talks about nuking their natural production. But your natural production is already shit due to the times we live in.

There was a study done in 2016. It recorded the Testosterone levels of young men (15-29) in 1999 and in 2016. It found that the average Testosterone levels had dropped from 605 ng/dl in 1999 to 450 ng/dl in 2016. And note that this was pre-covid in 2016. Imagine how low it is now.

My point is that our testosterone levels are already low due to the sedentary life most people live now. So you should be embracing exogenous Testosterone. Not afraid of it. Running TRT will make you perform better, look better, have a bigger flaccid, etc

But I would wait until 18-21 before you start running TRT
 
  • +1
Reactions: economy, King.epstein, Trojanhorse1 and 2 others
this protocol completely disregards the long-term risks of hpta axis suppression in a 15-year-old, the 500 mg weekly testosterone e dosage is highly excessive, while the nolvadex pct is inadequate to restore gonadal function after such prolonged pubertal suppression.
gpt gayslop kys
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Lucasegoliftson, KellSS and phescobar07
using exogenous testosterone at age 15 is impossible to do safely without suppressing natural production because any dose sufficient for lm effects will disrupt the still-developing hpg axis, gh or igf-1 secretagogues are scientifically superior for bone growth and vertical development at this stage
Hgh does not grow bones you are retarded ive been on 7+ ius of pharma grade gh for months now with a bone age of 13 and all i got was bloat and height jfl if it does grow bones it will be in the most disgusting and horrifying way possible and require 12+ ius
this protocol completely disregards the long-term risks of hpta axis suppression in a 15-year-old, the 500 mg weekly testosterone e dosage is highly excessive, while the nolvadex pct is inadequate to restore gonadal function after such prolonged pubertal suppression.
Genuine low quality ai slop, anything past 250 mg of test will yield the same suppression, it isnt excessive unless youre some health cuck. Nolvadex is useless and will close plates, and you WILL recover even with no pct just takes time. Use hcg and you will have no problems with your hpta. If you are so scared of suppression just keep cruising retard.
 
  • +1
Reactions: veryown
All roads lead to b&c:yes:
Is it a bad idea to cruise rather than pct after my first cycle if my goal is to just do a couple cycles while I’m young but don’t want to be stuck on test for life for long term health and fertility? Im worried that if I cruise in between my only 2-3 cycles before hopping off permanently, I will greatly reduce my chances of fully bringing back my natural production compared to if I were to have played it safe and done pct, despite pct being worse for maintaining muscle and stable hormones
 

Similar threads

hopefulllarp
Replies
8
Views
36
Genio
Genio
C
Replies
2
Views
19
dxoforprez
dxoforprez
T
Replies
7
Views
59
taylaurent
T
foidrepeller271
Replies
29
Views
211
manuel355335
M
Justanormie:c
  • Question
Looksmaxxing HGH at 15?
Replies
1
Views
37
patrikos.psl
patrikos.psl

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top