Test or HGH for bone mass?

RYVINIXX

RYVINIXX

Ascend and forget
Joined
Jun 23, 2025
Posts
156
Reputation
104
As mentioned in the title, my question is what’s better for bone mass, Test or HGH at 16-17? Me and my friend were arguing about it, on which is better.
Ik we are both greycells but we are just trying to learn. Thanks!
 
  • +1
Reactions: MangoLover, MulletM1chas and lightningspeedd
dont be so miserable with greycels, i have seen how you react dude you act like they are some kind of balding indians
I said "Neither" you fucking moron.
If you consider that miserable then I pray to see the day you deal with any minor inconvenience in life.
 
As mentioned in the title, my question is what’s better for bone mass, Test or HGH at 16-17? Me and my friend were arguing about it, on which is better.
Ik we are both greycells but we are just trying to learn. Thanks!
Both combined dont do less than 250mg of test or less than 8iu hgh with ai and bonesmashing the bones you're recessed in
 
I said "Neither" you fucking moron.
If you consider that miserable then I pray to see the day you deal with any minor inconvenience in life.
i have seen your activity, its basic pattern recognition what minor inconvenience dumbass? i havent seen you once say anything thats not a fucking insult
 
i have seen your activity, its basic pattern recognition what minor inconvenience dumbass? i havent seen you once say anything thats not a fucking insult
I help users that ask genuine questions that require nuance, not beg to be spoonfed information.
Please feel free to let me know how my post in this thread can constitute an insult.
There is already discourse on this forum that demonstrates these compounds won't just magically cause you to gain bone volume in your face.
Jon Zherka took 4 grams of AAS, including 2 grams of tren, per week, and his face hardly changed outside of a beard.
So what makes you think a measly cycle of 300mg/week will do shit for anyone? You're a retard, and I should've treated the OP harsher.
 
I help users that ask genuine questions that require nuance, not beg to be spoonfed information.
Please feel free to let me know how my post in this thread can constitute an insult.
There is already discourse on this forum that demonstrates these compounds won't just magically cause you to gain bone volume in your face.
Jon Zherka took 4 grams of AAS, including 2 grams of tren, per week, and his face hardly changed outside of a beard.
So what makes you think a measly cycle of 300mg/week will do shit for anyone? You're a retard, and I should've treated the OP harsher.
i understand that op lacks iq however there are others who read the text and think it applies to them, specifically people who are actually developing, OR those who are far behind when it bone age. Not like these people are asking if 2iu will cause acromegaly, they are seeking info and everyone has to start from somewhere. I only mentioned this because i saw you a trillion times just being an utter dipshit, and your words carry meaning since they circulate arounds someone head, someone
 
As mentioned in the title, my question is what’s better for bone mass, Test or HGH at 16-17? Me and my friend were arguing about it, on which is better.
Ik we are both greycells but we are just trying to learn. Thanks!
Test ofc. Use if ur older tho. Gh if ur still in puberty
 
As mentioned in the title, my question is what’s better for bone mass, Test or HGH at 16-17? Me and my friend were arguing about it, on which is better.
Ik we are both greycells but we are just trying to learn. Thanks!
none
 

Similar threads

yamus
Replies
13
Views
238
mylo1234
mylo1234
lin1011
Replies
4
Views
109
Embrace
Embrace
atomblanket
  • Solved
Looksmaxxing Enclo Test HGH
Replies
2
Views
61
atomblanket
atomblanket
F
Replies
13
Views
99
matthaal20
matthaal20
I
Replies
31
Views
170
mike63729193
M

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top