www.bbc.com
?source:
united nations
I turned off the vid after 45 seconds, the guy is too retarded.
Nice confirmation bias.
Wikipedia itself is biased retard.Wow.. this guy runs a institute https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heartland_InstituteJames Taylor (lawyer) - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
That is known for " its rejection of both the scientific consensus on climate change and the negative health impacts of smoking"
But im the biased one right retard?
Bro are you fucking retarded?
Low IQ postThanks, big oil dick suckers. Scientists predicted this 20 years ago, but you wanted to "own" the libs rather than listen. Fuck you humans as we just hit 2.0CWorld's hottest year: 2024 first to pass 1.5C warming limit
Last year was the world's warmest on record, bringing temperatures above a politically symbolic milestone.
Taylor has criticized climate change science through both his own publications and op/eds, and the Heartland Institute, which has consistently received funding from ExxonMobil. [3] While Taylor espouses through Environment and Climate News that climate change is neither a significant nor man-made problem, and that scientists who say it is are environmental extremists, others argue that a "major purpose of the publication has been to look at global warming from industry's perspective" rather than through the viewpoint of real science. [4]
I'm smarter than you
Before you reply with something stupid, make sure to read first.
Doesn’t make the post high IQ bud
Any time, thanks for the advice bucko.
for what? pointing out that climate change is a real thing?
Nice deflection.
"Taylor has criticized climate change science through both his own publications and op/eds, and the Heartland Institute, which has consistently received funding from ExxonMobil. [3] While Taylor espouses through Environment and Climate News that climate change is neither a significant nor man-made problem, and that scientists who say it is are environmental extremists, others argue that a "major purpose of the publication has been to look at global warming from industry's perspective" rather than through the viewpoint of real science. [4]"
No evidence that Global Warming is human propagated.
Climate change is real but the narrative around it is false.
You have no argument here.
You didn't have one in the first place
Yes there is?????? What the fuck are you talking about
MAGA is based and your a faggot loving retard
Lemme get dat
You were the one claiming bias first. On top of that you have failed to address his points.
"lemme get dat"
OP is a troll:
looksmax.org
I didn't bother looking at his bullshit reasoning, he's indirectly being funded by oil companies to shill the narative that climate change isnt real and big oil companies=good
MAGA is a cult of white trash subhuman conspiracy theorists organized around a narcissistic retard who is completely incompetent at being a leader
He is rightOP is a troll:
Sorry incel, the science is settled
300 IQ science woman debunks every looksmax.org/incel talking point Raw milk is bad because of bacteria, pasteurization process merely means heating it to 165f for 15 seconds to kill the bad stuff, nutrients remain intact. Aspartame is good because we only need small amounts of it, it is...
Im not even MAGA but they are sm better than Democrats.
I'm farther right then anyone on this site kek.
The earths climate has been shifting since before we ever started emitting those bud.
AKA you’re lazy and close minded.
About what?
No, i'd rather not waste time on big oil companies propaganda
