that's it this forum is not safe for teenagers CP is allowed and people who show emotions to it are silence

[innerlightskin]

why don't u tell your mom on what u stnad

on the defending of CP

why don't you tell her

love to see the mortification on her face that she went through so much

for such disgust

what cp?

 

[ToDelirium]

@Ghost Philosophy

I'm surprised I thought you were a teacher

wouldn't a teacher do anything to defend his students/kids

you guys twist words and meanings

this is child pornography plain and simple


"even Indirectly suggesting sexual activity or involving explicit themes (like bestiality or sexual innuendo) with a minor qualifies as sexual exploitation under U.S. law. The intent and context matter, not just whether the act is explicit.
U.S. Law (18 U.S. Code § 2256) doesn’t just focus on explicit sex acts. If the minor is sexualized or depicted in a sexual context, it qualifies as CHILD PORN



come on you guys are going to defend literally child pornography
just because you don't like me


I might be in the wrong

but I was emotional and scared
I'm still growing like all of us

and I'm stating my truth

I wont back down the truth

even if its me vs ALL of you

I know that's in the wrong
and I know I would help someone like me


Sincerely-me

Mf, link the fucking context, nobodies got time to scamble through your thousands of posts

 

[random subhuman]

@Ghost Philosophy

I'm surprised I thought you were a teacher

wouldn't a teacher do anything to defend his students/kids

you guys twist words and meanings

this is child pornography plain and simple


"even Indirectly suggesting sexual activity or involving explicit themes (like bestiality or sexual innuendo) with a minor qualifies as sexual exploitation under U.S. law. The intent and context matter, not just whether the act is explicit.
U.S. Law (18 U.S. Code § 2256) doesn’t just focus on explicit sex acts. If the minor is sexualized or depicted in a sexual context, it qualifies as CHILD PORN



come on you guys are going to defend literally child pornography
just because you don't like me


I might be in the wrong

but I was emotional and scared
I'm still growing like all of us

and I'm stating my truth

I wont back down the truth

even if its me vs ALL of you

I know that's in the wrong
and I know I would help someone like me


Sincerely-me

First of all the fuck are you doing here brah
This forum is not for prepubescent boyos like you,you should've been banned since you were new

 

[soapbubble]

If it not CP can we see what it looks like because there a lot of misinformation circulating on this shit

what cp?

the original had his face in it, i’m just censoring out of courtesy

not cp but still weird

 

[Ahmed88]

If it not CP can we see what it looks like because there a lot of misinformation circulating on this shit

 

[innerlightskin]

View attachment 4778251
the original had his face in it, i’m just censoring out of courtesy

not cp but still weird

JFL, that shit is funny

 

[random subhuman]

View attachment 4778253

NIGGA I'M DYING

SO THAT'S THE REASON HE GOT OFFENDED SO HARD RIGHT

 

[innerlightskin]

View attachment 4778253

oh nah

 

[shedontluv-U]

View attachment 4778251
the original had his face in it, i’m just censoring out of courtesy

not cp but still weird

Ok NGL sorry @ragingmanlet you are clearly in the wrong you told me he was full clothes and knowing he is 13 bro wtf + is his real face


Ban raging

And

Exile @sick kunt31 for a time ( nigga is clearly too young for this forum )

 

[ragingmanlet]

Ok NGL sorry @ragingmanlet you are clearly in the wrong you told me he was full clothes and knowing he is 13 bro wtf + is his real face


Ban raging

And

Exile @sick kunt31 for a bit ( nigga is too young for this forum )

Do you know what nudity means you faggot?

 

[ragingmanlet]

Ok NGL sorry @ragingmanlet you are clearly in the wrong you told me he was full clothes and knowing he is 13 bro wtf + is his real face


Ban raging

And

Exile @sick kunt31 for a bit ( nigga is too young for this forum )

That was the og pic he posted here

 

[soapbubble]

Ok NGL sorry @ragingmanlet you are clearly in the wrong you told me he was full clothes and knowing he is 13 bro wtf + is his real face


Ban raging

And

Exile @sick kunt31 for ( nigga is clearly too young for this forum )

@ragingmanlet that ai pic might be technically allowed here and doxxing is pretty shitty to do but you’re still weird as fuck for that ngl

 

[ragingmanlet]

@ragingmanlet that ai pic might be technically allowed here and doxxing is pretty shitty to do but you’re still weird as fuck for that ngl

 

[shedontluv-U]

View attachment 4778267

That is ok because the rawhoney guy have that in PFP and is clearly fully clothed

 

[Former Shortcel]

This forum is a glorified daycare. What a shitshow

 

[iblamefranklin]

@Ghost Philosophy

I'm surprised I thought you were a teacher

wouldn't a teacher do anything to defend his students/kids

you guys twist words and meanings

this is child pornography plain and simple


"even Indirectly suggesting sexual activity or involving explicit themes (like bestiality or sexual innuendo) with a minor qualifies as sexual exploitation under U.S. law. The intent and context matter, not just whether the act is explicit.
U.S. Law (18 U.S. Code § 2256) doesn’t just focus on explicit sex acts. If the minor is sexualized or depicted in a sexual context, it qualifies as CHILD PORN



come on you guys are going to defend literally child pornography
just because you don't like me


I might be in the wrong

but I was emotional and scared
I'm still growing like all of us

and I'm stating my truth

I wont back down the truth

even if its me vs ALL of you

I know that's in the wrong
and I know I would help someone like me


Sincerely-me

whats the context??

 

[Hernan]

muh allows it

@Ghost Philosophy

I'm surprised I thought you were a teacher

wouldn't a teacher do anything to defend his students/kids

you guys twist words and meanings

this is child pornography plain and simple

what words?

"even Indirectly suggesting sexual activity or involving explicit themes (like bestiality or sexual innuendo) with a minor qualifies as sexual exploitation under U.S. law. The intent and context matter, not just whether the act is explicit.
U.S. Law (18 U.S. Code § 2256) doesn’t just focus on explicit sex acts. If the minor is sexualized or depicted in a sexual context, it qualifies as CHILD PORN

under *US law, the USA isnt the world and even then there's 0 under 18 sexual imagery here.

come on you guys are going to defend literally child pornography
just because you don't like me


I might be in the wrong

but I was emotional and scared

what is this fucking shit?

I'm still growing like all of us

and I'm stating my truth

I wont back down the truth

even if its me vs ALL of you

transformers 2007?

I know that's in the wrong
and I know I would help someone like me

you're talking about cp which isnt allowed on here and is punished with a permaban then deleted to your own sorry self.
@Ghost Philosophy wie de kanker denkt deze dat hij is

Sincerely-me

I will

and if that happens


than this forum is nothing but a pedofile defending cesspool

the moment you accuse anyone of being a pdf with 0 proof.

 

[surgical]

Whiny little bitch, ragingmanlet owns u

 

[Luquier]

It wasnt cp, it was just some ai generated picture that hes overexaggerating about cause he threatened to doxx another user

This is the consequence of having under 16s on this forum

We need an age purge tbh

These toddlerfags are insufferable

 

[JordanFagget271]

@JordanFagget271 maybe i will be able to do my first packwatch ripbozo afterall

dumbest beef ive ever seen
no bozo for u tho

 

[unowkn]

@Ghost Philosophy

I'm surprised I thought you were a teacher

wouldn't a teacher do anything to defend his students/kids

you guys twist words and meanings

this is child pornography plain and simple


"even Indirectly suggesting sexual activity or involving explicit themes (like bestiality or sexual innuendo) with a minor qualifies as sexual exploitation under U.S. law. The intent and context matter, not just whether the act is explicit.
U.S. Law (18 U.S. Code § 2256) doesn’t just focus on explicit sex acts. If the minor is sexualized or depicted in a sexual context, it qualifies as CHILD PORN



come on you guys are going to defend literally child pornography
just because you don't like me


I might be in the wrong

but I was emotional and scared
I'm still growing like all of us

and I'm stating my truth

I wont back down the truth

even if its me vs ALL of you

I know that's in the wrong
and I know I would help someone like me


Sincerely-me

Nigga this isnt an anime

 

[kisslessvirgin]

did they free da zoo, everyone is out.
welcome welcome back