The best mewing result i've ever seen (GigaStacy lol)

Yeah, it's probably not a great combination to be here crippling about improving looks while overthinking with OCD jfl
i take advantage of it, I'm about to become a kpopmaxxing saint
 
Everyone on my dad's side of the family seems to have it, I got some downgrowth so I'm not sure if the tie may have caused that. From what people here say I should probably get it (maybe asap) but I'm reluctant to do so since either my dentist is not gonna know about it or say it's "normal", or whoever would get it out is not gonna do the full procedure or not do it properly.

Maybe I'm overthinking but most orthodontists here are really fucking bluepilled and don't really know about some things
maybe cutting it with scissors could help, study this so you don't fuck up though
 
  • +1
Reactions: MentalistKebab
i take advantage of it, I'm about to become a kpopmaxxing saint
please becomea saint and go to heaven (and dont come back)
 
  • JFL
Reactions: It'snotover
yep around the same altough I need ~1-2 more years of mewing to get that side profile
Isn't there a kind of "limit" to where mewing can get you though?
 
i take advantage of it, I'm about to become a kpopmaxxing saint
A white kpopmaxxing might be interesting to see jfl

maybe cutting it with scissors could help, study this so you don't fuck up though
I think you have to do myofunctional therapy before and after and probably some more stuff, that's why I'm worried about getting it removed even if I might be overthinking it. If the othodontist doesn't know or doesn't do this it can probably mess my tongue up. I feel like using scissors to cut it could go wrong in so many ways too JFL.

yeah, probably hits a permanent plateau at around 3-4 years
At that point can you just stop mewing and keep the results? Supposedly it could go back but idk about that.

Also just noticed I'm almost at 500 posts... crap, I wanted to stay a greycel here, NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
 
A white kpopmaxxing might be interesting to see jfl


I think you have to do myofunctional therapy before and after and probably some more stuff, that's why I'm worried about getting it removed even if I might be overthinking it. If the othodontist doesn't know or doesn't do this it can probably mess my tongue up. I feel like using scissors to cut it could go wrong in so many ways too JFL.


At that point can you just stop mewing and keep the results? Supposedly it could go back but idk about that.

Also just noticed I'm almost at 500 posts... crap, I wanted to stay a greycel here, NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
the fuck does jfl mean btw?
Joking for Life?
 
A white kpopmaxxing might be interesting to see jfl


I think you have to do myofunctional therapy before and after and probably some more stuff, that's why I'm worried about getting it removed even if I might be overthinking it. If the othodontist doesn't know or doesn't do this it can probably mess my tongue up. I feel like using scissors to cut it could go wrong in so many ways too JFL.


At that point can you just stop mewing and keep the results? Supposedly it could go back but idk about that.

Also just noticed I'm almost at 500 posts... crap, I wanted to stay a greycel here, NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
you are an experienced looksmaxxer after 500 points my man

mew for your whole life
 
GrFBsidZD3wuv06YAu7opiupvtD3vwOdDCgGjmCUKqnC-09171r62lRIR65k9X18nRrg8jPWAf0RMR8o4adj3Od5lZNXUFvtkw=w780-nu-rj-l80-e365
4b09245e5f5ad943fe95c5c75ff02c9c8704b6a8_hq.jpg


JFL

That guy looks so gay it's uncanny
 
  • +1
Reactions: wopman33
That guy looks so gay it's uncanny
thirsted by asians, you wouldn't understand, your favorite types are probably some american girls from any american pie movie
 
thirsted by asians, you wouldn't understand, your favorite types are probably some american girls from any american pie movie

Yea right, fish lips mixed with chimp lips, on top of an ultra gay look, i'll never set foot in asia.
 
Yea right, fish lips mixed with chimp lips, on top of an ultra gay look, i'll never set foot in asia.
it's not for everyone, I'm glad it's my thing, i have less competition with people like you xd
have a good one
 
sure whatever balding teen lol
I am 25, I have been in this space for 8 years and I am on my way to a medical degree. You have no clue what you are talking about. You will realize you should have listened in a few years when your best years are long gone 👍🏻
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 27213
I am 25, I have been in this space for 8 years and I am on my way to a medical degree. You have no clue what you are talking about. You will realize you should have listened in a few years when your best years are long gone 👍🏻
aight we'll see
 
Tbh, it's really a Pascal's wager.
There are lots of "proven" benefits to doing it and there still is a possibility it can alter your bone structure before the age of 25...which may be dependent on the person.
And there are many proven negative benefits to not having correct tongue posture.
So when it comes down to it you are better of doing it rather than not doing it.
 
Tbh, it's really a Pascal's wager.
There are lots of "proven" benefits to doing it and there still is a possibility it can alter your bone structure before the age of 25...which may be dependent on the person.
And there are many proven negative benefits to not having correct tongue posture.
So when it comes down to it you are better of doing it rather than not doing it.
this, response right here, 200iq
 
  • +1
Reactions: Roamer
Greycel moment if u think mewing works u are not even blackpilled
 
jew nose, ugly dyed hair, granny clothes = no taste, keep dreaming shes 6.5/10
 
crazy how "mewing" made the distance between her ear and chin grow a couple cm apart despite her being in adulthood with consolidated bone
 
  • +1
Reactions: inceI
crazy how "mewing" made the distance between her ear and chin grow a couple cm apart despite her being in adulthood with consolidated bone
same thing happening to me
 
Different angles.
 
please explain how mewing moves the lower jaw when its the force to the upper palate that makes the bone gorw

(it does nothing btw)
If the upper palate is bigger, the lower jaw can protract forward. Simple
 
If the upper palate is bigger, the lower jaw can protract forward. Simple
By that logic there would only be retarded jaws, not class II or III malocclusion. Also protracting does not make the bone grow. Mike mew lost hist medical license and is being sued for malpractice as we are speaking. He is a charlatan.

Keep in mind even the charlatan himself and his charlatan dad NEVER claimed that mewing works on adults, the internet just ate it up and he had been riding that wave ever since. He only claimed that it works on kids (it does not).
 
By that logic there would only be retarded jaws,
Wtf does this even mean

not class II or III malocclusion.
See above

Also protracting does not make the bone grow. Mike mew lost hist medical license and is being sued for malpractice as we are speaking. He is a charlatan.

Keep in mind even the charlatan himself and his charlatan dad NEVER claimed that mewing works on adults, the internet just ate it up and he had been riding that wave ever since. He only claimed that it works on kids (it does not).

If the upper expands, the lower will catch up over time because the cusps have to readjust to biting against the wider palate. Simple enough
 
Wtf does this even mean


See above



If the upper expands, the lower will catch up over time because the cusps have to readjust to biting against the wider palate. Simple enough
Meant to se biretruded, auto correct made it be retarded.

Well then by that logic we are only talking about arch width. The claim of adapting arch width is not completely outlandish but would never fix facial projection even if it was true.
 
Meant to se biretruded, auto correct made it be retarded.

Well then by that logic we are only talking about arch width. The claim of adapting arch width is not completely outlandish but would never fix facial projection even if it was true.
Of course it can. If the jaws have more room to move, they have more room to project
 
Of course it can. If the jaws have more room to move, they have more room to project
They always have plenty room to project, there is nothing keeping them from growing forward. They just don't.
 
They always have plenty room to project, there is nothing keeping them from growing forward. They just don't.
The widening of them is what allows this growth. Why is this hard to understand? Even if the bones don't change shape, a wider palate allows you to protract your jaw eventually to the point the lower jaw has to widen to adapt. This way it sits in a more forward position.

A good example of this are Class 3 maloclussions. The lower palate is wider than the top and projects well. By widening the top and lengthening it, you get Class 3 projection but without the underbite
 
The widening of them is what allows this growth. Why is this hard to understand? Even if the bones don't change shape, a wider palate allows you to protract your jaw eventually to the point the lower jaw has to widen to adapt. This way it sits in a more forward position.

A good example of this are Class 3 maloclussions. The lower palate is wider than the top and projects well. By widening the top and lengthening it, you get Class 3 projection but without the underbite

Even in class 3, the lower dental arch is usually not wider but the same width as the top arch. Widening the top arch is not treatment for class 3. Protracting the jaw does absolutely nothing for jaw growth. Devices that protract the jaw (SnoreRx, etc.) Help with sleep apnea but don't do anything to the jaw, except potentially damage the condyle of the TMJ. If it did, users of such appliances would develop malocclusions over time.

I see you are still a mewing-coper. There is no way to convince you otherwise. I recommend you try mewing for a few years and learn for yourself it's absolutely b.s., just dont let it stop you from pursuing actually effective treatment
 
Even in class 3, the lower dental arch is usually not wider but the same width as the top arch. Widening the top arch is not treatment for class 3.
Except it is. See pics
15 Figure10 1
Carriere fig 11

Protracting the jaw does absolutely nothing for jaw growth. Devices that protract the jaw (SnoreRx, etc.) Help with sleep apnea but don't do anything to the jaw, except potentially damage the condyle of the TMJ. If it did, users of such appliances would develop malocclusions over time.
That's great except nobody suggested that just protracting was the solution. What i said was a wider upper palate simply ALLOWS for the lower jaw to protract without going into an underbite position (aka jutting like a moron) because the upper arch has that much area
I see you are still a mewing-coper. There is no way to convince you otherwise. I recommend you try mewing for a few years and learn for yourself it's absolutely b.s., just dont let it stop you from pursuing actually effective treatment
Been mewing and chewing since 2018 and it's legit af. When I started combining chewing in 2020, it was a game changer because my lower arch is always pulling against the upper to the point my lower premolars are slowly widening in their distance between them, while the incisors chewing pushes my upper incisors forward to shorten my philtrum. This causes my lower incisors to be retroclined over time. The main goal of this is midfacial shortening through a poutier upper lip, and more lower jaw projection from the lower incisors coming backward.

I am even explaining the simple mechanism by which the human arch widens, and it seems a difficult concept for you to understand. This is not just about mewing
 
Last edited:
This is not only a class 3 but also a cross- and open- bite. The expansion is used to fix the crossbite, then braces pull the teeth forwards allowing the arch to expand. The arch is not the maxilla. In the "after" pic, you can see that her crosbite is fixed, but she still has the skeeltal structure of a class 3 malocclusion (her jaws have not changed, only the arch). This is a successful case of Camouflage orthodondics, an aesthetcially pleasing result beyound the teeth alignment would require surgery.
That's great except nobody suggested that just protracting was the solution. What i said was a wider upper palate simply ALLOWS for the lower jaw to protract without going into an underbite position (aka jutting like a moron) because the upper arch has that much area

The mandible is fixed in its position, and can not be pushed backwards or forwards without leaving its socket. you clearly lack understanding of the anatomy of the temporomandibular joint. any protraction moves the lower jaw joint out of its socket.
500px-TMJdisc.jpg

Been mewing and chewing since 2018 and it's legit af. When I started combining chewing in 2020, it was a game changer because my lower arch is always pulling against the upper to the point my lower premolars are slowly widening in their distance between them, while the incisors chewing pushes my upper incisors forward to shorten my philtrum.
you mean you are inclining your teeth, giving yourself an overjet. you are sacrificing your teeth aesthetics for a more inclined and visually shorter philtrum.
overjet-1296x4020-body.jpg

This causes my lower incisors to be retroclined over time. The main goal of this is midfacial shortening through a poutier upper lip, and more lower jaw projection from the lower incisors coming backward.

this would not expand your lower jaw, it would however give you the appearance of a larger chin combined with more severe mandibular recession. There will be no change in mandibular length.
I am even explaining the simple mechanism by which the human arch widens, and it seems a difficult concept for you to understand. This is not just about mewing
nothing about this is simple and you are not able to explain anything, altough i would love to see pictures of the calimed "changes" in your anatomy. the only plausible change is one of dental arches, altough most likely not a desirable one. you are a prime example why charlatane doctors like mike mew are dangerous and rightfully being sued.


Just fyi i am a med student and have 2 years of anatomy class behind me, i know what i am talking about to some extent.
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Deleted member 17244
Except it is. See pics
View attachment 2160123View attachment 2160124

That's great except nobody suggested that just protracting was the solution. What i said was a wider upper palate simply ALLOWS for the lower jaw to protract without going into an underbite position (aka jutting like a moron) because the upper arch has that much area

Been mewing and chewing since 2018 and it's legit af. When I started combining chewing in 2020, it was a game changer because my lower arch is always pulling against the upper to the point my lower premolars are slowly widening in their distance between them, while the incisors chewing pushes my upper incisors forward to shorten my philtrum. This causes my lower incisors to be retroclined over time. The main goal of this is midfacial shortening through a poutier upper lip, and more lower jaw projection from the lower incisors coming backward.

I am even explaining the simple mechanism by which the human arch widens, and it seems a difficult concept for you to understand. This is not just about mewing
FINALLY, someone who also believes in mewing

it 100% changed my face, either bones, skin, just bones, just skin, i don't even know but it changed my face for the better and imma do it for the rest of my life
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 23778
This is not only a class 3 but also a cross- and open- bite. The expansion is used to fix the crossbite, then braces pull the teeth forwards allowing the arch to expand. The arch is not the maxilla. In the "after" pic, you can see that her crosbite is fixed, but she still has the skeeltal structure of a class 3 malocclusion (her jaws have not changed, only the arch). This is a successful case of Camouflage orthodondics, an aesthetcially pleasing result beyound the teeth alignment would require surgery.
None of that changes the fact the upper arch was narrower than the lower
The mandible is fixed in its position, and can not be pushed backwards or forwards without leaving its socket. you clearly lack understanding of the anatomy of the temporomandibular joint. any protraction moves the lower jaw joint out of its socket.
500px-TMJdisc.jpg
You can move the mandible forward within its condyle. I am not talking about dislodging it like Ronny Ead. The mandible is NOT a fixed position and can move freely to am extent. It is after all a "floating" bone in that regard. If it couldn't, we wouldn't be able to eat.

Not to mention you have zero idea of my mandible condyle position. Some people's mandible too jammed in their condyle and relaxing can be beneficial. Think people who clench.
you mean you are inclining your teeth, giving yourself an overjet. you are sacrificing your teeth aesthetics for a more inclined and visually shorter philtrum.
overjet-1296x4020-body.jpg
Nope, you are talking about something that happens to people with a shit lip seal and a narrow arch. Nobody with a wide arch and SLIGHT proclination has an overjet, and I challenge you to find me such a case. This is entirely different. Look at Chris Carmack. Guy has a slight overjet and good facial aesthetics. In fact upper teeth slightly proclined is ideal and primitive teeth were this way.

What you refer to is something entirely different and is called bimaxillary protrusion, which happens when the lip seal is weak. It gives a thumb sucking style profile.
this would not expand your lower jaw, it would however give you the appearance of a larger chin combined with more severe mandibular recession. There will be no change in mandibular length.

If the upper cusps are wide and the lower cusps are narrow, chewing against the upper cusps widens them over time. That's what cusps are for. The mandible length doesn't need to change if the mandible is in a slightly forward position in the condyle.
nothing about this is simple and you are not able to explain anything,

that you can understand. You're already misunderstanding by applying terms incorrectly. Such as you not understanding the difference between bimaxillary protrusion and a healthy inclination of incisors.
altough i would love to see pictures of the calimed "changes" in your anatomy. the only plausible change is one of dental arches, altough most likely not a desirable one. you are a prime example why charlatane doctors like mike mew are dangerous and rightfully being sued.
Just fyi i am a med student and have 2 years of anatomy class behind me, i know what i am talking about to some extent.
Cool story meanwhile you post misinformation
 
None of that changes the fact the upper arch was narrower than the lower

You can move the mandible forward within its condyle. I am not talking about dislodging it like Ronny Ead. The mandible is NOT a fixed position and can move freely to am extent. It is after all a "floating" bone in that regard. If it couldn't, we wouldn't be able to eat.

Not to mention you have zero idea of my mandible condyle position. Some people's mandible too jammed in their condyle and relaxing can be beneficial. Think people who clench.

Nope, you are talking about something that happens to people with a shit lip seal and a narrow arch. Nobody with a wide arch and SLIGHT proclination has an overjet, and I challenge you to find me such a case. This is entirely different. Look at Chris Carmack. Guy has a slight overjet and good facial aesthetics. In fact upper teeth slightly proclined is ideal and primitive teeth were this way.

What you refer to is something entirely different and is called bimaxillary protrusion, which happens when the lip seal is weak. It gives a thumb sucking style profile.


If the upper cusps are wide and the lower cusps are narrow, chewing against the upper cusps widens them over time. That's what cusps are for. The mandible length doesn't need to change if the mandible is in a slightly forward position in the condyle.


that you can understand. You're already misunderstanding by applying terms incorrectly. Such as you not understanding the difference between bimaxillary protrusion and a healthy inclination of incisors.

Cool story meanwhile you post misinformation
mewing works!
just proper lip seal, chew, whole tongue push against palate and you good, maybe some other things i forgot about
YES, neck posture
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 23778
None of that changes the fact the upper arch was narrower than the lower

You can move the mandible forward within its condyle. I am not talking about dislodging it like Ronny Ead. The mandible is NOT a fixed position and can move freely to am extent. It is after all a "floating" bone in that regard. If it couldn't, we wouldn't be able to eat.

Not to mention you have zero idea of my mandible condyle position. Some people's mandible too jammed in their condyle and relaxing can be beneficial. Think people who clench.

Nope, you are talking about something that happens to people with a shit lip seal and a narrow arch. Nobody with a wide arch and SLIGHT proclination has an overjet, and I challenge you to find me such a case. This is entirely different. Look at Chris Carmack. Guy has a slight overjet and good facial aesthetics. In fact upper teeth slightly proclined is ideal and primitive teeth were this way.

What you refer to is something entirely different and is called bimaxillary protrusion, which happens when the lip seal is weak. It gives a thumb sucking style profile.


If the upper cusps are wide and the lower cusps are narrow, chewing against the upper cusps widens them over time. That's what cusps are for. The mandible length doesn't need to change if the mandible is in a slightly forward position in the condyle.


that you can understand. You're already misunderstanding by applying terms incorrectly. Such as you not understanding the difference between bimaxillary protrusion and a healthy inclination of incisors.

Cool story meanwhile you post misinformation
You will have to see in time
 

Similar threads

Sloppyseconds
Replies
11
Views
1K
davidlaidisme67
davidlaidisme67
negativepsl
Replies
27
Views
972
ceasar3x
ceasar3x
S
Replies
1
Views
550
Liferuiner
Liferuiner
dietcel
Replies
13
Views
567
Lars2
Lars2
Messier 4
Replies
32
Views
637
Squidwardmaxx
Squidwardmaxx

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top