The butterfly effect is bizarre

[TsarTsar444]

So wierd tbh, for example inagine if Bism*rk died young. Germany would probably unite way later then 1871, this will change history alot, ww1 probably won't happen, and ww2 won't (at least how it happened in our timeline), everything would be different today. Just one single man is the cause of my suffering or pleasure today

 

[Enfant terrible]

Just one single man is the cause of my suffering or pleasure today

yeah your father brutal

 

[studiocel]

The only man responsible for your suffering is your dad

 

[AlexAP]

Cope, Germany was extremely nationalist at that time, the countries would have united at some point, and WW1 was likely to happen too with all the rivalries.

The only big events with big consequences were Germany losing and Russia becoming communist. These two things should have been prevented for a better 20th century.

 

[BigJimsWornOutTires]

I've heard of the cascade impact thus the butterfly effect. Some scholars believe, without a doubt, if one was to masturbate in the time stream continuum, it could ripple great consequences throughout the timelines.

 

[TsarTsar444]

Cope, Germany was extremely nationalist at that time, the countries would have united at some point, and WW1 was likely to happen too with all the rivalries.

The only big events with big consequences were Germany losing and Russia becoming communist. These two things should have been prevented for a better 20th century.

Lmao you clearly don't know 19th century German history. There is a big difference in the German Nationalism. That difference is that the original German nationalist were from the south and were libertarians and non expansionist (the 1848 German movement).

Why is Bismarck a problem? Cause he was Prussian and Prussia was extremely militarist compared to the western and southern German states. Its PRUSSIA uniting Germany that was the butterfly effect of Bismarck i said. The western and southern German states were pretty much in very good terms with France and England, its when Prussia "united" Germany when they started massively militirazing the country and spreading ideas of extreme German imperialism.

Germany would definitely unite, but for first:
1. It would happen later then 1871, somewhere closer to 1900, and by this time Africa would be already eaten up without Germany getting their slice once united in 1900)

2. Ww1 happening either way is true, but it would be a completely different war with different alliances. If the united Germany was liberal it would never be a threat to France and Russia like in our timeline, and in the east Russia and Austria would remain balanced rivals. Austria would never attack Serbia in our timelin3 because there wont be the Prussian Germany to help them out againts Russia, so ww1 would start over something else and with a different allies and outcome.

 

[AlexAP]

Lmao you clearly don't know 19th century German history.

I have never felt more hurt in my life after reading this sentence.

 

[TsarTsar444]

I have never felt more hurt in my life after reading this sentence.

Don't know if serious tbh, but sorry i guess jfl idk, but you should have known about the two polar opposites of 19th century German unification ideas

 

[AlexAP]

Don't know if serious tbh, but sorry i guess jfl idk

JFL

but you should have known about the two polar opposites of 19th century German unification ideas

I knew about Prussian militarism, but the difference wasn't that important after 1848. Everyone wanted an unified country. The only debate was whether Austria would be part of it (Greater German solution) or not, Bismarck literally throw Austria out as part his plan of gaining political power. But the political and social ideologies of the German state would have been largely the same, the times were very nationalist and it would have lead to the war with all the other rivalries between the European powers.

 

[mulattomaxxer]

Butterfly effect is crazy tbh. If I never sucked my thumb as a child I wouldn't be posting here.

 

[TsarTsar444]

JFL

I knew about Prussian militarism, but the difference wasn't that important after 1848. Everyone wanted an unified country. The only debate was whether Austria would be part of it (Greater German solution) or not, Bismarck literally throw Austria out as part his plan of gaining political power. But the political and social ideologies of the German state would have been largely the same, the times were very nationalist and it would have lead to the war with all the other rivalries between the European powers.

Bro this just isn't true, Prussia was much more militaristic then other states. Sure it will still be nationalism, but nothing like Prussia. A Germany united by agreements from all states together would make a Germany that would be much less militarized and not keen on expension into Loraine in France.

Also a big difference is that ww1 only happened because the Keiser encouraged Austria to attack Serbia because Germany will have its back. If Germany was much less millitirized we would never have Austria attacking Serbia because they won't have a Imperialist Germany behind them to helo them againts Russia

 

[subhuman incel]

@OldVirgin