THE CASE FOR CASE FOR EUGENICS AND ABORTION

[ugly_man]

FROM WOMB TO WASTE: THE CONSERVATIVE CASE FOR EUGENICS AND ABORTION

GAINESVILLE, Fla.— Studies consistently show that the latter-day church ladies, that is, liberals and leftists, report lower levels of happiness and life satisfaction than …

thedissidentright.home.blog

GAINESVILLE, Fla.— Studies consistently show that the latter-day church ladies, that is, liberals and leftists, report lower levels of happiness and life satisfaction than conservatives. It was estimated that 51% of conservatives report excellent well-being versus just 20% of liberals. In one sample, 14% of those diagnosed with depression were extremely liberal, despite only 5% of the population identifying as such. Nothing highlights the heavy psychological toll associated with progressive beliefs then the spiritual malaise more than their nihilistic and misanthropic worship of death—and their visceral hatred of beauty. Nothing underscores this spiritual rot more clearly than their nihilistic worship of death and their seething hatred of beauty, both physical and moral, akin to Cotton Mather, Oliver Cromwell, Mother Ann Lee, Joseph Meacham, and their Puritan and Shaker forefathers. One need look no further than the juvenile backlash to an entirely innocuous jeans advertisement featuring 27-year-old Sydney Sweeney—the embodiment of traditional feminine beauty, with her golden hair, striking blue eyes, perfect figure( which includes a very big and natural buttocks and metaphysical mammaries that are so filled with milk that it could feed a starving country), and refined taste in American muscle cars, most notably the iconic Ford Mustangs, obviously the finest vehicle ever manufactured. Her mere presence was enough to send the perpetually aggrieved into fits of hysteria and perpetual kvetching, as if her very existence were an affront to the joyless, androgynous aesthetic the modern left now demands of its cultural idols. That such effortless beauty could inspire fury reveals a movement so warped by envy and alienation that even the aesthetic becomes a battlefield. This same pathology was on full display in the grotesque reaction to the death of Terry Gene Bollea, who was better known by his stage name Hulk Hogan. Instead of solemnity or reflection, the multitude of swarming vulgar mass of infected virulence that crawled out of cacogenic cesspools to comprise the left greet the demise of ideological opponents with open glee. The legendary professional wrestler—once a ubiquitous symbol of an all-American bravado—was swiftly eulogised not with reverence, but with disdain, his death treated by the entire liberal and leftist movement not as a juncture for reflection, but as an occasion for political score-settling. Comments ranged from accusing the Hulkster of being a racist, a homophobe, a union-buster, and a bootlicker, to outright fantasies of desecration. Some declared they wanted to dance on his grave, others heralded his death purely because of his support for President Donald Trump, with more than a few expressing open yearnings that other Trump supporters would soon follow him into the grave. They even blamed and celebrate a White couple for being a victim of hate crime at a Jazz festival. Unfortunately, the misthropies are not just confined to words.

From torching ICE facilities to the horrifying act of dousing a local Republican lawmaker in Virginia with a whopping five gallons of gasoline and setting him ablaze in his own office, the mask has slipped. What remains is not a politics of compassion, but a cult of annihilation masquerading as justice. Obviously, the pitiful mistake of an existence (lebensunwertes leben, life unworthy of life) and nihilistic and misanthropic worship of death among liberals makes one reconsider the merits of a pro-life stance and question whether an all-merciful God could truly abide such creatures of spite and decay. As regular readers of this poorly written, AI-generated goyslop might have guessed, the Spiteful Mutant Theory offers an accurate and provocative lens through which to diagnose the pathologies of modern society. It posits that in a civilisation insulated from natural hardship and untethered from traditional structures of meaning, the evolutionary forces that once selected for strength, beauty, resilience, and virtue have been inverted. In their place is a dysgenic dystopia worse than any zombie apocalypse. Industrialisation, coupled with the precipitous decline of eugenic sciences following its politically toxic association with the brilliant German Doctor Josef Mengele and the National Socialist regime, brought about a dramatic reduction in mortality—particularly infant mortality. On one hand, this marks a triumph of human compassion and medical advancement; life, after all, is sacred and its preservation is a noble pursuit.

But on the other hand, it has produced unintended consequences that few dare to acknowledge. In the absence of the selective pressures once exerted by a more unforgiving world, traits that were previously self-limiting—such as emotional instability, intellectual fragility, and physical infirmity—are no longer curbed by nature or society. Instead, they are preserved and, in many cases, elevated, especially with the Jewry of consumerism, transhumanism, and globalist capitalism driving modern technology and the takeover of clankers. The embittered, the maladapted, and the psychologically unwell—those who in a saner, more arduous age might have been corrected, humbled, or even culled by circumstance—are now free to thrive, and even dominate, within the protective bubble of modern decadence much like Mike Judge’s science fiction comedy film Idiocracy. And there is the irony, of course, that is almost too rich to ignore. By morally repudiating nihilism and industrialised infanticide (commonly known as abortion), conservatives may, unwittingly, be accelerating the very civilizational decay they seek to contain, sealing their doom(the only way win the left must be countered with the same fanatical millenarian nihilism). In their noble defence of life and rejection of utilitarian cruelty, they preserve not only the innocent but also the scum of the earth. From drooling down syndrome retards to the future criminals and welfare dependents now swelling the ranks of the lumpenproletariat, one need only look at the millions of anchor babies— born not of loyalty, but of legal loopholes—who, like the disgusting parasite they are, leech off the dwindling prosperity built by the blood and toil of our White Anglo-Saxon Protestant forefathers. Perhaps, the Jewish baby-killer organisation, Planned Parenthood, should make their founder, Marget Sanger proud, by begging Pres. Trump and Director Homan to join the thousands of IRS agents deployed at the border and sanctuary cities, or at least deputise Casey Anthony as an ICE agent.

Speaking of parasitic dependence and the ever-expanding class of leeches draining the dwindling prosperity built by our White Anglo-Saxon Protestant forefathers, consider this: in FY 2022, the federal government wasted a staggering $4.1 trillion on transfer payments to dependents, many of them are negros. For contrast, in 1945—at the height quasi-socialist wartime regime started by Rooselvelt and his New Deal—only $15.6 billion (adjusted to 2019 dollars) was spent on such programs, amounting to a mere 1.5% of the federal budget and just 0.6% of GDP. What was once an emergency lifeline has metastasized into a permanent entitlement state, feeding off the bones of a civilization it did not build and cannot sustain. While veterans struggle to survive—squeezed by scarcity and bureaucratic neglect—the state continues to lavish entitlements on those who have contributed nothing to the nation’s fabric. The solution is not more spending, but moral triage: cutting off the louses from the government’s swollen teat through eugenics and abortion so that those who have earned their place—the builders, the defenders, the faithful sons of this once glorious republic—can finally share in the fruits of a nation they assisted sustain. Unless one is under the delusions of Lysenkoism, A modern redux of Buck v. Bell (1927) and Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc., however politically unpalatable, is the only conceivable bulwark against a burgeoning kakistocracy and the Bioleninist revolution, wherein the least capable multiply unchecked, overwhelming the welfare system and ultimately collapsing it under the weight of their dependency. Incarceration, too, has become a costly form of state-sponsored dependency—an institutional holding pen for the mentally unstable, the intellectually inferior, and the legions of degenerates and violent thugs who cannot, or will not, function within civil society. Far from being a solution, the modern prison system increasingly serves as a monument to our failure to impose meaningful standards. The financial toll is staggering. With an estimated 1,808,100 deadbeats currently held in U.S. prisons and jails—including state, federal, and local facilities—the price of containing this dysfunction continues to soar.

The direct annual cost of incarceration alone hovers around $350 billion. But that figure barely scratches the surface. When one factors in the broader economic impact of crime—ranging from property loss and legal expenses to the incalculable pain and suffering inflicted upon victims—the annual cost to the nation balloons to somewhere between $690 billion and an eye-watering $3.41 trillion, depending on the methodology. However, between 1993 and 2022, the rate of violent victimization in the United States plummeted from 79.8 to 23.5 incidents per 1,000 persons aged 12 or older—a decline that has sparked ongoing debate. The crue truth of the matter is that the post-Roe v. Wade era of legalized child-sacrifice for this reduction, suggesting that crime fell not due to better policing or social programs, but because millions of potential criminals were never born. It would also yield significant improvements in education by reducing the burden imposed by the intellectually unfit—those so cognitively impaired that they are not only incapable of grasping even basic instruction, but in many cases struggle with the simplest tasks, like tying their own shoes! In truth, far from being dysgenic or discouraging hypergamy, a selective approach to reproduction rooted in r/K selection theory—favouring quality over unchecked quantity—would restore societal balance by reducing the burden of low-functioning dependents and allowing resources, education, and mating incentives to flow toward the competent, the virtuous, and the strong. Yes, I am deranged/severely mentally ill and mentally retarded—but unlike the system that enables mass mediocrity, I still support eugenics, because even I can see that a civilisation rewarding dysfunction over excellence is circling the drain. I wrote the article above, and if that fact alone offends you more than the truths it contains, then perhaps you're exactly the kind of spiteful mutant it was written about!

Your unwavering support and continued engagement are truly invaluable, breathing life into each word crafted and sustaining this platform’s mission. If you found resonance or insight within this piece, I kindly invite you to express your appreciation by tapping the heart icon and sharing it with those who may also benefit. These small but significant gestures not only amplify our collective voice but also help the algorithm recognise and extend our message to a broader audience. Your involvement makes all the difference—God bless and thank you for being an integral part of this journey. Furthermore, I offer my sincere apologies for both my recent absence and the diminished quality of content. This regrettable decline stems from the demands of an increasingly burdensome work schedule, compounded by a noticeable deterioration in my cognitive clarity and mental well-being. I appreciate your patience and understanding during this challenging period, and remain committed to restoring the standard you rightfully expect.