The Civil Rights movement

[EuphoricAsianNormie]

The civil rights movement never destroyed white supremacism, instead it was a Trojan horse to maintain white supremacism through psychological and cultural colonization.

WMXF before the 1960's was much less common in Africa, Asia, and the Anglosphere than than it is today.

The average ethnik foid born after 1960 fetishizes white males way more than the average ethnik foid born as European colonial subjects.

WMIF is more common in the modern UK than it was under the British Empire.

WMAF is more common in Hong Kong, Singapore, and Malaysia today than it was under British colonialism.

Before the 1960's, AMWF was more common in the Anglosphere than WMAF, but this is largely due to the gender ratio of Asians being male-shifted.

The generation of Hong Kong, Malaysian and Singaporean Chinese foids born after British colonialism likes white men more than the generation born during British colonialism did.

The generation of MENA foids born after European colonialism fetishes European men more than the generations born during European colonialism did.

 

[price.]

 

[shngstaaaa107]

View attachment 5672107

lmao tattoo botch

 

[EuphoricAsianNormie]

@inyerta @chang cypionate @Tenres, @Bully

 

[R1b_eugenicist]

You can build an argument that white fetishisation from asiatic fo1ds comes primarily from permanent novelty factor and permanent statusmax which is always attributed to white men in those countries. Theres definitely an economic base to this.

From what I have been looking into, asiatic men tend to have a lot lower T than their white counterparts, which obv leads to WMAF. I am curious tho what has been the dynamic with that and is it just a recent thing or always have been like that.

 

[ethnic_coper67]

The civil rights movement never destroyed white supremacism, instead it was a Trojan horse to maintain white supremacism through psychological and cultural colonization.

WMXF before the 1960's was much less common in Africa, Asia, and the Anglosphere than than it is today.

The average ethnik foid born after 1960 fetishizes white males way more than the average ethnik foid born as European colonial subjects.

WMIF is more common in the modern UK than it was under the British Empire.

WMAF is more common in Hong Kong, Singapore, and Malaysia today than it was under British colonialism.

Before the 1960's, AMWF was more common in the Anglosphere than WMAF, but this is largely due to the gender ratio of Asians being male-shifted.

The generation of Hong Kong, Malaysian and Singaporean Chinese foids born after British colonialism likes white men more than the generation born during British colonialism did.

The generation of MENA foids born after European colonialism fetishes European men more than the generations born during European colonialism did.

This completely misses the point. Increased intercultural dating is a result of globalization, freedom of choice, and migration, not 'cultural colonization.

 

[americanpakitruvcel]

The civil rights movement never destroyed white supremacism, instead it was a Trojan horse to maintain white supremacism through psychological and cultural colonization.

WMXF before the 1960's was much less common in Africa, Asia, and the Anglosphere than than it is today.

The average ethnik foid born after 1960 fetishizes white males way more than the average ethnik foid born as European colonial subjects.

WMIF is more common in the modern UK than it was under the British Empire.

WMAF is more common in Hong Kong, Singapore, and Malaysia today than it was under British colonialism.

Before the 1960's, AMWF was more common in the Anglosphere than WMAF, but this is largely due to the gender ratio of Asians being male-shifted.

The generation of Hong Kong, Malaysian and Singaporean Chinese foids born after British colonialism likes white men more than the generation born during British colonialism did.

The generation of MENA foids born after European colonialism fetishes European men more than the generations born during European colonialism did.

Why would the civil rights movement increase white fetishism?

 

[EuphoricAsianNormie]

You can build an argument that white fetishisation from asiatic fo1ds comes primarily from permanent novelty factor and permanent statusmax which is always attributed to white men in those countries. Theres definitely an economic base to this.

From what I have been looking into, asiatic men tend to have a lot lower T than their white counterparts, which obv leads to WMAF. I am curious tho what has been the dynamic with that and is it just a recent thing or always have been like that.

I admit that white do look better on average, but still White male SMV has a lot to do with status because even ugly and effeminate white men could get ethnik women with relative ease.

 

[EuphoricAsianNormie]

Why would the civil rights movement increase white fetishism?

Because the civil rights movement did not destroy white supremacism it maintained white supremacism through psychological and cultural colonization, WMXF is more common post-1965 than under EUropean imperialism.

 

[EuphoricAsianNormie]

This completely misses the point. Increased intercultural dating is a result of globalization, freedom of choice, and migration, not 'cultural colonization.

Why was WMIF more rare in British India compared with modern India?

Why was WMAF more rare in Hong Kong under British colonialism compared with post-1997 handover?

Why do millennial Asian foids fetishize white men, specifically Northwest European men more than boomer or Gen X Asian foids do?

Why was AMWF more common in French colonial Vietnam than in modern Vietnam?

Why was did ratio between WMAF and AMWF in Singapore have less disparity under British colonialism than in modern Singapore?

 

[JewishNationalist]

bro who even needs those unattractive ethnic foids

 

[EuphoricAsianNormie]

bro who even needs those unattractive ethnic foids

I just noticed a pattern that WMXF couples are more common in the so-called post-colonial era than it ever was under European colonialism.

 

[JewishNationalist]

Because the civil rights movement did not destroy white supremacism it maintained white supremacism through psychological and cultural colonization, WMXF is more common post-1965 than under EUropean imperialism.

white supremacism is biological its not about civil rights

 

[JewishNationalist]

I just noticed a pattern that WMXF couples are more common in the so-called post-colonial era than it ever was under European colonialism.

well perhaps. still though i wouldn't rly want to fuck ethnic girl unless she looks white

 

[EuphoricAsianNormie]

white supremacism is biological its not about civil rights

White supremacism is true to a certain extent, I am talking about white supremacism in a social and institutional sense.

White male SMV is raised due to status.

 

[RICEascension]

water
its still 99% mainly because whites look better