shredded4summer
Pretty Boy Chad
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2023
- Posts
- 4,337
- Reputation
- 7,269
@Iraniancel @iblamemandible7 @bigwilly10 @SilverStCloud @Zeekie
Here is an accurate representation. each categories lines up as you go down
this pretty much means that if you are getting rated 5 by normies you are subhuman. this has to be a normie that doesnt hate you cause they might troll you and say youre a 3 or smth or if youre attractive say you are a 5 to hate on you but if they like you and they give these values then this is what it equates to in reality
ibb.co
as you can see the normie scale is a min of 5 and it goes above 10 (when they rate you 10 they dont mean you are perfect so when a true chad pulls up they gotta change their scale and rate them an 11. this is how retarded foids are btw)
i hope this makes sense. the drawing is a lil shit so i can explain it but in essence
normie rating to org rating to true scale conversion
5 = subhuman = 1-2 (deformity)
6 = ltn = 3-4 (ehh kinda ugly)
7 = mtn = 4-5~ (alright standard)
8 = htn = 6-7! (handsome)
9 = cl = 7-8 (very attractive)
10+ = chad = 8-10 (close to perfection)
these are very approximate i just want to make it for the sake of understanding.
the thing to consider here is that no scale is true. its not accurate to say that the normie rating scale is bad cause it works, at the end of the day it gets the point across even if it isnt scaled perfectly but its honestly idiotic to say 1 scale is wrong and the other is right unless you are making a real distribution curve but that would be useless because as i mentioned women cant see men that are ugly therefore the "average" doesnt matter and is stupid to care about in this context. if we did it based on average then a most attractive people would be 9.9 since being in the top 1% is easy asf
I just want us to keep the true meaning of "ltn, mtn, htn" in mind remember that mtn LOOKS average (even if it isnt) so even if the average normie is high ltn just understand that just cause your ugly ass got rated mtn you cant rate htns mtn cause "muh looks inflation" sybau please
this scale has made rating incredibly easy infact. if you look a bit ugly you are ltn if you look normal youre mtn if you look good youre htn. simple you are most likely not subhuman or cl/chad cause i promise you would know if you were
Here is an accurate representation. each categories lines up as you go down
this pretty much means that if you are getting rated 5 by normies you are subhuman. this has to be a normie that doesnt hate you cause they might troll you and say youre a 3 or smth or if youre attractive say you are a 5 to hate on you but if they like you and they give these values then this is what it equates to in reality
Screenshot-2025-07-11-at-16-25-57 hosted at ImgBB
Image Screenshot-2025-07-11-at-16-25-57 in Raw Milk's images album
ibb.co
as you can see the normie scale is a min of 5 and it goes above 10 (when they rate you 10 they dont mean you are perfect so when a true chad pulls up they gotta change their scale and rate them an 11. this is how retarded foids are btw)
i hope this makes sense. the drawing is a lil shit so i can explain it but in essence
normie rating to org rating to true scale conversion
5 = subhuman = 1-2 (deformity)
6 = ltn = 3-4 (ehh kinda ugly)
7 = mtn = 4-5~ (alright standard)
8 = htn = 6-7! (handsome)
9 = cl = 7-8 (very attractive)
10+ = chad = 8-10 (close to perfection)
these are very approximate i just want to make it for the sake of understanding.
the thing to consider here is that no scale is true. its not accurate to say that the normie rating scale is bad cause it works, at the end of the day it gets the point across even if it isnt scaled perfectly but its honestly idiotic to say 1 scale is wrong and the other is right unless you are making a real distribution curve but that would be useless because as i mentioned women cant see men that are ugly therefore the "average" doesnt matter and is stupid to care about in this context. if we did it based on average then a most attractive people would be 9.9 since being in the top 1% is easy asf
I just want us to keep the true meaning of "ltn, mtn, htn" in mind remember that mtn LOOKS average (even if it isnt) so even if the average normie is high ltn just understand that just cause your ugly ass got rated mtn you cant rate htns mtn cause "muh looks inflation" sybau please
this scale has made rating incredibly easy infact. if you look a bit ugly you are ltn if you look normal youre mtn if you look good youre htn. simple you are most likely not subhuman or cl/chad cause i promise you would know if you were
