Deleted member 4612
mentally crippled by lonely teen years
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2020
- Posts
- 21,729
- Reputation
- 43,429
The cornerstone of it is assuming women are more fragile/gullible/mentally weaker and thus can't be fully held accountable for their actions, but at the same time, that they still deserve freedom, large amounts of licentiousness, the possibility of holding positions of authority, etc.
Think about it; let's use the most odious average agecuck as a first example:
A man who thinks women under a certain age should not fuck AT ALL, with anyone, and should be punished if she did, might be unreasonable (since we know women are already more than fertile and ready for cock earlier than ever nowadays and that women's brains never reach a point in which they can be trusted for good mate selection, so this is irrelevant), but I wouldn't say he's an agecuck. What makes someone an agecuck is simultaneously thinking foids under some arbitrary age are a no-go for men who are above another arbitrary age (category that often includes himself, enhancing the cuckold aspect of it; "I'll mount guard so that older men like me don't bother you while you fuck young Chad, m'lady"), but it's ok for men under a certain age to ravish their holes freely.
Someone who thinks women are more fragile/gullible/mentally weaker and thus can't be fully held accountable for their actions, but stays consistent with this view and concludes that they can't enjoy freedom, licentiousness and let alone positions of power either, is also not a cuck/simp/etc. The cuck/simp/etc is the one who'll treat women as poor gullible children to let them off the hook whenever they mess up, but will at the same time support them having freedom and all the other aforementioned things.
The most common scenario nowadays for both men and women is pretending to be a textbook feminist and that men and women should have exactly the same rights and amount of responsibility, but when push comes to shove, women will enjoy tons of privileges and women will get treated much better by these people when they mess up because of gynocentrism.
Think about it; let's use the most odious average agecuck as a first example:
A man who thinks women under a certain age should not fuck AT ALL, with anyone, and should be punished if she did, might be unreasonable (since we know women are already more than fertile and ready for cock earlier than ever nowadays and that women's brains never reach a point in which they can be trusted for good mate selection, so this is irrelevant), but I wouldn't say he's an agecuck. What makes someone an agecuck is simultaneously thinking foids under some arbitrary age are a no-go for men who are above another arbitrary age (category that often includes himself, enhancing the cuckold aspect of it; "I'll mount guard so that older men like me don't bother you while you fuck young Chad, m'lady"), but it's ok for men under a certain age to ravish their holes freely.
Someone who thinks women are more fragile/gullible/mentally weaker and thus can't be fully held accountable for their actions, but stays consistent with this view and concludes that they can't enjoy freedom, licentiousness and let alone positions of power either, is also not a cuck/simp/etc. The cuck/simp/etc is the one who'll treat women as poor gullible children to let them off the hook whenever they mess up, but will at the same time support them having freedom and all the other aforementioned things.
The most common scenario nowadays for both men and women is pretending to be a textbook feminist and that men and women should have exactly the same rights and amount of responsibility, but when push comes to shove, women will enjoy tons of privileges and women will get treated much better by these people when they mess up because of gynocentrism.
