The difference between a $1,000 jacket and $3,000 jacket are vast

BeautifulBones

BeautifulBones

Banned
Joined
Dec 2, 2018
Posts
561
Reputation
416
  • +1
Reactions: Swagwaffle
For those curious this is what I spend my money on:
Fly Clothes
Gold Jewelry
Expensive Lunches and Dinners
Rent
Vacations
My $400 a month skin routine
This is good if you save/invest enough, unfortunately most people wageslave for this and end up wageslaving forever
 
  • +1
Reactions: BeautifulBones and CupOfCoffee
The scond one is browner and bigger
 
  • +1
Reactions: BeautifulBones
This is ridiculous to spend money on unless you're rich as fuck.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Insomniac, BeautifulBones and dogtown
Only gays care about fashion
 
  • +1
Reactions: Insomniac and BeautifulBones
Only gays care about fashion
Well fashion is important part of looksmaxing but only within a budget. Some people would like to stay wage slaves forever apparently.
 
  • +1
Reactions: BeautifulBones and dogtown
If you can't tell the differences between these two

https://www.mrporter.com/en-us/mens/mr_p/shearling-trimmed-suede-bomber-jacket/1104245

and

https://www.mrporter.com/en-us/mens/de_bonne_facture/shearling-bomber-jacket/1069696

Fashion is not a road you can take to ascend

For those curious this is what I spend my money on:
Fly Clothes
Gold Jewelry
Expensive Lunches and Dinners
Rent
Vacations
My $400 a month skin routine

Do you have a university degree ?
 
  • +1
Reactions: BeautifulBones
  • +1
Reactions: Future Arablite
Understand ppl that wear those brands that’s just like 1% of there income.

I do want a Canada goose jacket tho
 
  • +1
Reactions: BeautifulBones
FB IMG 1545012379298
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 39
Bomber jackets are out of style though.
 
The difference between a $100 jacket and a $500-$1000 is huge in terms of quality, always will be

The difference between these is that they're both complete ripoffs but the second one is an even bigger ripoff

jfl at falling for expensive brands when chad wears $20 jeans and a $10 white t shirt that just fits well and slays :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:
 
  • +1
Reactions: dodt and Deleted member 206
The difference between a $100 jacket and a $500-$1000 is huge in terms of quality, always will be

The difference between these is that they're both complete ripoffs but the second one is an even bigger ripoff

jfl at falling for expensive brands when chad wears $20 jeans and a $10 white t shirt that just fits well and slays :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:

But every time I go to a small town I get constant compliments on my fashion from woman, and I'm only 6'2 170 lbs. Girls like nice clothes everything else is linear reductionist cope.

Sure if your gl enough you can offset bad fashio to some degree

but even in the tinder black pill experiment the guy was dressed well
 
But every time I go to a small town I get constant compliments on my fashion from woman, and I'm only 6'2 170 lbs. Girls like nice clothes everything else is linear reductionist cope.

Sure if your gl enough you can offset bad fashio to some degree

but even in the tinder black pill experiment the guy was dressed well
you can dress well within a budget that's 1/5th, maybe less of the equivalent budget you'd need for $3k jackets. of course there's a certain point in ur budget under which you simply cannot afford to dress well, but anything over $500 for a single piece of clothing is imo overkill and won't get you more compliments or attention compared to similar pieces of clothing for a more reasonable price
 
you can dress well within a budget that's 1/5th, maybe less of the equivalent budget you'd need for $3k jackets. of course there's a certain point in ur budget under which you simply cannot afford to dress well, but anything over $500 for a single piece of clothing is imo overkill and won't get you more compliments or attention compared to similar pieces of clothing for a more reasonable price

Diminishing returns for sure, but girls can still notice fine details. I just grew up poor/homeless, so now that I make good money I take a lot of pride and joy in dressing well. I often times don't look at the price tag in store's like Barney's , and I'm grateful to the lord for this blessing everyday
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 470
Max I paid this year is 110$ Calvin Klein shirt on my avi.
 
Sure if your gl enough you can offset bad fashio to some degree
Just who the fuk looks at your sense of fashion? Even if someone notices it, it has nothing to do with attraction.
 
Just who the fuk looks at your sense of fashion? Even if someone notices it, it has nothing to do with attraction.

Post is too Low IQ

The ability to dress well is directly correlated with openness to experience in the artistic domain. Which is strongly genetically determined by your parents

If your rich enough that people dress you that's a status + money PSL boost

Arguing against you is too easy. I know what your going to write before your write it. You're in a similar camp as @Dude420 , but at least with him he makes good points and I learn something new.
 
scam, for that price you can get a suit made from scratch just for you
 
Post is too Low IQ

The ability to dress well is directly correlated with openness to experience in the artistic domain. Which is strongly genetically determined by your parents

If your rich enough that people dress you that's a status + money PSL boost

Arguing against you is too easy. I know what your going to write before your write it. You're in a similar camp as @Dude420 , but at least with him he makes good points and I learn something new.
Calm down, I have just pointed out that it has nothing to do with sexual attraction. JFL if you think somebody cares about personality, in terms of building the ONS (can be prolonged to occasional meetups for the purpose of having sex) relationship, which is one of the most popular models of relationships now, since it sorts out any other motivation between the two and leaves only the pure sexual attraction as a stimulus.
Agreed that it makes you appear somewhat high status and shows you have some money. But money and status are not related to sexual attraction, and thus to PSL. Let me again state my previous point I made in another thread of yours: money and status attracts only golddiggers or any other person that wants to get some of your resources, it is their motivation. GL man attracts women who want to get the sexual pleasure from being in some intercourse (chat, kisses, sex etc.) with that GL man, their motivation is also clear. How dont you understand that difference in motivations. In both cases your offer some value, but those two separate values fill completely different needs of women. The need/desire for sexual pleasure and the need/desire for resources (money, status, perks etc) are in completely different dimensions, whose ven diagrams are not interesecting (!).
By adding money/status etc. into the equation for PSL you are basically saying that those two needs/desires are actually equivalent for a woman. Moreover, I will restate again, paying huge money for hookers/escorts does not make anybody a slayer, even if that man fucks the shit out of them in the end. Its just buying the chance to have sex for money as a service, not by raising their sexual motivation to have sex with you. Those are completely different things.
 
Last edited:
Calm down, I have just pointed out that it has nothing to do with sexual attraction. JFL if you think somebody cares about personality, in terms of building the ONS (can be prolonged to occasional meetups for the purpose of having sex) relationship, which is one of the most popular models of relationships now, since it sorts out any other motivation between the two and leaves only the pure sexual attraction as a stimulus.
Agreed that it makes you appear somewhat high status and shows you have some money. But money and status are not related to sexual attraction, and thus to PSL. Let me again state my previous point I made in another thread of yours: money and status attracts only golddiggers or any other person that wants to get some of your resources, it is their motivation. GL man attracts women who want to get the sexual pleasure from being in some intercourse (chat, kisses, sex etc.) with that GL man, their motivation is also clear. How dont you understand that difference in motivations. In both cases your offer some value, but those two separate values fill completely different needs of women. The need/desire for sexual pleasure and the need/desire for resources (money, status, perks etc) are in completely different dimensions, whose ven diagrams are not interesecting (!).
By adding money/status etc. into the equation for PSL you are basically saying that those two needs/desires are actually equivalent for a woman. Moreover, I will restate again, paying huge money for hookers/escorts does not make anybody a slayer, even if that man fucks the shit out of them in the end. Its just buying the chance to have sex for money as a service, not by raising their sexual motivation to have sex with you. Those are completely different things.

Genetic Desirability = Sexual Attraction

Looks aren't the only thing that is genetically desirable , and it's that simple
scam, for that price you can get a suit made from scratch just for you

A good suit can last 2-3 years, but a good jacket made of a good leather can last 2-3 decades if you stay the same size
 
Last edited:
Genetic Desirability = Sexual Attraction
You are right, those two needs are inherest in woman, they come from genetic wiring. But those two are completely separate things JFL.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top