The difference between white genocide and Native American genocide.

[thenewhebbe]

Why would them being poorer mean more babies?

They just do m this well known

 

[Aladin]

Yes bhai I must be a retard, but I been through more pain in a day than u will ik ur life. anyway, hope u live forever bhaijaan

Keep coping faggot

 

[Aladin]

They just do m this well known

Well then importing poor people is genicidubg whites as they start to outnumber them.

 

[Chinacurry]

Keep coping faggot

How am I coping???

 

[Aypo129]

Good
Total white genocide is a must

 

[thenewhebbe]

Well then importing poor people is genicidubg whites as they start to outnumber them.

They will get richer so they will have the same amount babies as westerners

 

[Aladin]

They will get richer so they will have the same amount babies as westerners

Nope Hispanics in America have more babies. Their culture causes this. Also they steal more jobs.

 

[Aladin]

How am I coping???

"yes bhai i must be a retard" is a sarcastic statement, which suggests you don't actually think you're a retard, when you are. if you're gonna admit you're a retard, do it in a STRAIGHTFORWARD WAY WITH HUMILITY.

 

[PMF1]

I am not sure of them being genocided as much as other people's swamping their homelands, which in turn decreases their numbers. Whites could literally just have more babies but people in mass haven't ever changed their behavior that drastically.

 

[Aladin]

I am not sure of them being genocided as much as other people's swamping their homelands, which in turn decreases their numbers. Whites could literally just have more babies but people in mass haven't ever changed their behavior that drastically.

That is genocide.

 

[PMF1]

That is genocide.

Not trying to be offensive but how? I would call it invasion.

 

[Aladin]

Not trying to be offensive but how? I would call it invasion.

The United Nations has a simple and logical answer to what constitutes genocide: Taking actions, including inflicting policies or conditions, that will bring about such a disappearance. If, for example, you stopped feeding your baby and it starved to death, you can be charged with its murder even if you protest that you didn't kill it. That is because you inflicted conditions that you could see were in fact killing it.

Still confused? Suppose there was a race of people whose genetic traits were quite recessive such that when they mixed with other races, the children virtually always genetically grouped with the other race, and you flooded their homeland with other races and encouraged them to race-mix with those other races until all of them were mixed out of existence. You would then be inflicting conditions upon them calculated to bring about their disappearance.

Still confused? So you don't think that should count as genocide even though proponents of multiculturalism admit freely and readily that they foresee a time when all humans have been cross-mixed to being "brown" such that there is never another White person anywhere on planet earth? Suppose there was a kind of bear that was white in color and could mix with another kind of bear that was brown, consistently producing offspring that were not white, and legislation was passed to try to prevent this from happening so the white bears would not go extinct. You should ask the legislators why they did that since you don't see what the big deal was, because this actually happened regarding polar bears and grizzly bears out of fear of "climate change."

The desire to save the White race from eventual extinction is a conservationist movement no different in intent from any other animal conservationist movement; therefore you should oppose all animal conservationist movements unless you are some kind of a hypocrite.

 

[Sleeper]

The United Nations has a simple and logical answer to what constitutes genocide: Taking actions, including inflicting policies or conditions, that will bring about such a disappearance. If, for example, you stopped feeding your baby and it starved to death, you can be charged with its murder even if you protest that you didn't kill it. That is because you inflicted conditions that you could see were in fact killing it.

Still confused? Suppose there was a race of people whose genetic traits were quite recessive such that when they mixed with other races, the children virtually always genetically grouped with the other race, and you flooded their homeland with other races and encouraged them to race-mix with those other races until all of them were mixed out of existence. You would then be inflicting conditions upon them calculated to bring about their disappearance.

Still confused? So you don't think that should count as genocide even though proponents of multiculturalism admit freely and readily that they foresee a time when all humans have been cross-mixed to being "brown" such that there is never another White person anywhere on planet earth? Suppose there was a kind of bear that was white in color and could mix with another kind of bear that was brown, consistently producing offspring that were not white, and legislation was passed to try to prevent this from happening so the white bears would not go extinct. You should ask the legislators why they did that since you don't see what the big deal was, because this actually happened regarding polar bears and grizzly bears out of fear of "climate change."

The desire to save the White race from eventual extinction is a conservationist movement no different in intent from any other animal conservationist movement; therefore you should oppose all animal conservationist movements unless you are some kind of a hypocrite.

Australia, New Zealand, America etc all had their population utterly decimated using similar tactics. After a while the british were more concerned with establishing colonies and extracting resources than constantly warring against obscure tribes that only have sticks and stones in the first place so they instead just outlawed the native culture, language and religion and then slowly spread through land and simply out bred them, even incentivising natives to racemix or "become british". These exact same tactics are being used against whites, these methods have been used in different wars for thousands of years and the worst part is that it rarely fails, its a slow inevitable process that is only implemented once you have an absolute stranglehold on the targeted population. Races dont really "bounce back" from things like this