The Ethan Munt Meltdown

[The Forgotten Proph]

Ah here we go again…

My last thread breaking down the @Clavicular v.s Ethan Munt live debate did numbers, appreciate all the love. Since Ethan just dropped his “final” 7 minute dissertation from the moral grandstand, figured I’d give it the same treatment.

​

-Let’s break it down point by point, because if he’s gonna weaponize emotional vulnerability, someone has to weaponize logic.

-“Clav is targeting teens ” ​

“He says he doesn’t know if his audience is young… but his course has a pubertymaxing section” And? Pubertymaxing = biological education, not coercion. If that’s evil, then Huberman is running a teen cult.

-“He used science terms I didn’t understand”​

That’s not a rebuttal. That’s self snitching.
Imagine stepping into a debate, getting cooked by terminology, and then using your lack of comprehension as proof the other guy is wrong.

-“Clav’s physique is fake because he’s on gear”​

Gear ≠ cheating. Steroids are tools, not shortcuts. If you vomit from one bulk meal and tap out, you lost the natty vs enhanced conversation by default.

- “He said I’m attractive so I didn’t earn anything”​

Ethan pulls the classic “attractive but bullied” reversal card here, like trauma cancels out genetic luck. No one’s arguing he didn’t suffer. The point is: don’t talk about the grind like you came up from a sub when you started at above the norm.

-“Clav’s girlfriend isn’t hot so he’s a fraud ”​

Wild that this man pulled the moral outrage card for 3 minutes then said "skeleton foid" on the same breath. Can’t campaign as the ethical influencer if you’re body shaming and dragging someone’s girl into it. Either we’re protecting the youth, or we’re doing roasts. You can’t do both.

-“I don’t care about racist jokes… but he’s racist.”​

Bro. You literally said you don’t care about the N-word, then made multiple videos accusing Clav of racism. Either stand on it or sit it out. Moral inconsistency isn’t activism. It’s just bad branding.

-“Togi & TJR say the N-word but they’re chill guys ”​

You can’t selectively cancel people based on whether you like them IRL. That’s not moral clarity. That’s parasocial bias. If the principle matters, it applies universally. If not, you’re just a fan playing mod.

- “Cookie betrayed me ”​

No. Cookie didn’t co-sign your beef and that bruised your ego.Bringing up “I explained Christianity to him” as proof he owes you loyalty is wild. You tried to pull emotional debt in a content war. That’s not a betrayal. That’s your attachment wound flaring up.

-“Looksmaxing is destroying kids mental health”​

Looksmaxing is a mirror. You don’t like what it reflects? That’s not Clav’s fault. That’s your lack of framework to process appearance-based reality.
You didn’t refute the Blackpill. You just rejected it emotionally. Saying “I had DMs from kids thanking me” is not a study, it’s not a survey, it's a soft anecdote in a hard space.


The real tragedy here? Not that Ethan lost.
But that he thought he was fighting for truth when he was just fighting for likes.

Ascend or be left behind
-forgottenprophecy

 

[pfl]

dnrd

 

[sigma boii]

We need to start banning everyone under 16 again

 

[The Forgotten Proph]

dnrd

Awesome!

 

[The Forgotten Proph]

We need to start banning everyone under 16 again

Room temp IQ

 

[ikramy]

Fuck both of them who cares dnr

 

[Spur der Verwüstung]

Ah here we go again…

My last thread breaking down the @Clavicular v.s Ethan Munt live debate did numbers, appreciate all the love. Since Ethan just dropped his “final” 7 minute dissertation from the moral grandstand, figured I’d give it the same treatment.

​

-Let’s break it down point by point, because if he’s gonna weaponize emotional vulnerability, someone has to weaponize logic.

-“Clav is targeting teens ” ​

“He says he doesn’t know if his audience is young… but his course has a pubertymaxing section” And? Pubertymaxing = biological education, not coercion. If that’s evil, then Huberman is running a teen cult.

-“He used science terms I didn’t understand”​

That’s not a rebuttal. That’s self snitching.
Imagine stepping into a debate, getting cooked by terminology, and then using your lack of comprehension as proof the other guy is wrong.

-“Clav’s physique is fake because he’s on gear”​

Gear ≠ cheating. Steroids are tools, not shortcuts. If you vomit from one bulk meal and tap out, you lost the natty vs enhanced conversation by default.

- “He said I’m attractive so I didn’t earn anything”​

Ethan pulls the classic “attractive but bullied” reversal card here, like trauma cancels out genetic luck. No one’s arguing he didn’t suffer. The point is: don’t talk about the grind like you came up from a sub when you started at above the norm.

-“Clav’s girlfriend isn’t hot so he’s a fraud ”​

Wild that this man pulled the moral outrage card for 3 minutes then said "skeleton foid" on the same breath. Can’t campaign as the ethical influencer if you’re body shaming and dragging someone’s girl into it. Either we’re protecting the youth, or we’re doing roasts. You can’t do both.

-“I don’t care about racist jokes… but he’s racist.”​

Bro. You literally said you don’t care about the N-word, then made multiple videos accusing Clav of racism. Either stand on it or sit it out. Moral inconsistency isn’t activism. It’s just bad branding.

-“Togi & TJR say the N-word but they’re chill guys ”​

You can’t selectively cancel people based on whether you like them IRL. That’s not moral clarity. That’s parasocial bias. If the principle matters, it applies universally. If not, you’re just a fan playing mod.

- “Cookie betrayed me ”​

No. Cookie didn’t co-sign your beef and that bruised your ego.Bringing up “I explained Christianity to him” as proof he owes you loyalty is wild. You tried to pull emotional debt in a content war. That’s not a betrayal. That’s your attachment wound flaring up.

-“Looksmaxing is destroying kids mental health”​

Looksmaxing is a mirror. You don’t like what it reflects? That’s not Clav’s fault. That’s your lack of framework to process appearance-based reality.
You didn’t refute the Blackpill. You just rejected it emotionally. Saying “I had DMs from kids thanking me” is not a study, it’s not a survey, it's a soft anecdote in a hard space.


The real tragedy here? Not that Ethan lost.
But that he thought he was fighting for truth when he was just fighting for likes.

Ascend or be left behind
-forgottenprophecy

You are such a fucking clown im so mad you get to breathe air you Loser faggot go die

 

[The Forgotten Proph]

You are such a fucking clown im so mad you get to breathe air you Loser faggot go die

High iq

 

[Ogionth]

Ah here we go again…

My last thread breaking down the @Clavicular v.s Ethan Munt live debate did numbers, appreciate all the love. Since Ethan just dropped his “final” 7 minute dissertation from the moral grandstand, figured I’d give it the same treatment.

​

-Let’s break it down point by point, because if he’s gonna weaponize emotional vulnerability, someone has to weaponize logic.

-“Clav is targeting teens ” ​

“He says he doesn’t know if his audience is young… but his course has a pubertymaxing section” And? Pubertymaxing = biological education, not coercion. If that’s evil, then Huberman is running a teen cult.

-“He used science terms I didn’t understand”​

That’s not a rebuttal. That’s self snitching.
Imagine stepping into a debate, getting cooked by terminology, and then using your lack of comprehension as proof the other guy is wrong.

-“Clav’s physique is fake because he’s on gear”​

Gear ≠ cheating. Steroids are tools, not shortcuts. If you vomit from one bulk meal and tap out, you lost the natty vs enhanced conversation by default.

- “He said I’m attractive so I didn’t earn anything”​

Ethan pulls the classic “attractive but bullied” reversal card here, like trauma cancels out genetic luck. No one’s arguing he didn’t suffer. The point is: don’t talk about the grind like you came up from a sub when you started at above the norm.

-“Clav’s girlfriend isn’t hot so he’s a fraud ”​

Wild that this man pulled the moral outrage card for 3 minutes then said "skeleton foid" on the same breath. Can’t campaign as the ethical influencer if you’re body shaming and dragging someone’s girl into it. Either we’re protecting the youth, or we’re doing roasts. You can’t do both.

-“I don’t care about racist jokes… but he’s racist.”​

Bro. You literally said you don’t care about the N-word, then made multiple videos accusing Clav of racism. Either stand on it or sit it out. Moral inconsistency isn’t activism. It’s just bad branding.

-“Togi & TJR say the N-word but they’re chill guys ”​

You can’t selectively cancel people based on whether you like them IRL. That’s not moral clarity. That’s parasocial bias. If the principle matters, it applies universally. If not, you’re just a fan playing mod.

- “Cookie betrayed me ”​

No. Cookie didn’t co-sign your beef and that bruised your ego.Bringing up “I explained Christianity to him” as proof he owes you loyalty is wild. You tried to pull emotional debt in a content war. That’s not a betrayal. That’s your attachment wound flaring up.

-“Looksmaxing is destroying kids mental health”​

Looksmaxing is a mirror. You don’t like what it reflects? That’s not Clav’s fault. That’s your lack of framework to process appearance-based reality.
You didn’t refute the Blackpill. You just rejected it emotionally. Saying “I had DMs from kids thanking me” is not a study, it’s not a survey, it's a soft anecdote in a hard space.


The real tragedy here? Not that Ethan lost.
But that he thought he was fighting for truth when he was just fighting for likes.

Ascend or be left behind
-forgottenprophecy

here u go, another clav alt that he paid some dalit to create

 

[AuraMaxxing]

here u go, another clav alt that he paid some dalit to create

Anything for a free few months in his community jfl

 

[Funnyunenjoyer1]

Ah here we go again…

My last thread breaking down the @Clavicular v.s Ethan Munt live debate did numbers, appreciate all the love. Since Ethan just dropped his “final” 7 minute dissertation from the moral grandstand, figured I’d give it the same treatment.

​

-Let’s break it down point by point, because if he’s gonna weaponize emotional vulnerability, someone has to weaponize logic.

-“Clav is targeting teens ” ​

“He says he doesn’t know if his audience is young… but his course has a pubertymaxing section” And? Pubertymaxing = biological education, not coercion. If that’s evil, then Huberman is running a teen cult.

-“He used science terms I didn’t understand”​

That’s not a rebuttal. That’s self snitching.
Imagine stepping into a debate, getting cooked by terminology, and then using your lack of comprehension as proof the other guy is wrong.

-“Clav’s physique is fake because he’s on gear”​

Gear ≠ cheating. Steroids are tools, not shortcuts. If you vomit from one bulk meal and tap out, you lost the natty vs enhanced conversation by default.

- “He said I’m attractive so I didn’t earn anything”​

Ethan pulls the classic “attractive but bullied” reversal card here, like trauma cancels out genetic luck. No one’s arguing he didn’t suffer. The point is: don’t talk about the grind like you came up from a sub when you started at above the norm.

-“Clav’s girlfriend isn’t hot so he’s a fraud ”​

Wild that this man pulled the moral outrage card for 3 minutes then said "skeleton foid" on the same breath. Can’t campaign as the ethical influencer if you’re body shaming and dragging someone’s girl into it. Either we’re protecting the youth, or we’re doing roasts. You can’t do both.

-“I don’t care about racist jokes… but he’s racist.”​

Bro. You literally said you don’t care about the N-word, then made multiple videos accusing Clav of racism. Either stand on it or sit it out. Moral inconsistency isn’t activism. It’s just bad branding.

-“Togi & TJR say the N-word but they’re chill guys ”​

You can’t selectively cancel people based on whether you like them IRL. That’s not moral clarity. That’s parasocial bias. If the principle matters, it applies universally. If not, you’re just a fan playing mod.

- “Cookie betrayed me ”​

No. Cookie didn’t co-sign your beef and that bruised your ego.Bringing up “I explained Christianity to him” as proof he owes you loyalty is wild. You tried to pull emotional debt in a content war. That’s not a betrayal. That’s your attachment wound flaring up.

-“Looksmaxing is destroying kids mental health”​

Looksmaxing is a mirror. You don’t like what it reflects? That’s not Clav’s fault. That’s your lack of framework to process appearance-based reality.
You didn’t refute the Blackpill. You just rejected it emotionally. Saying “I had DMs from kids thanking me” is not a study, it’s not a survey, it's a soft anecdote in a hard space.


The real tragedy here? Not that Ethan lost.
But that he thought he was fighting for truth when he was just fighting for likes.

Ascend or be left behind
-forgottenprophecy

his face pisses me off so much