The fairy from the new Disney Pinocchio movie looks like a dude

[Deleted member 17430]

I'm sorry. She does.

When I first saw her, I legit thought it was a crossdressing fag. Wouldn't put it past disney since they've been going full woke lately.



Meanwhile the original fairy:

Just sad tbh, I hate the direction society is going.

 

[Deleted member 17430]

I'd be more attracted to the fairy from Del Toro's Pinocchio lol

I'd rather fuck an inhuman creature than a dude

 

[Deleted member 23558]

Society

 

[Brus Wane]

The original fairy had that nice friendly motherly vibe
The new one is some woke Hollywood BLM Kosher PsyOp

 

[Patient A]

Stop being antisemitic

you will worship the niggers and you will be happy

(((Society)))

 

[Deleted member 12002]

I'm sorry. She does.

When I first saw her, I legit thought it was a crossdressing fag. Wouldn't put it past disney since they've been going full woke lately.



Meanwhile the original fairy:

Just sad tbh, I hate the direction society is going.

Lol, that's too funny.

 

[FutureSlayer]

I'd be more attracted to the fairy from Del Toro's Pinocchio lol

I'd rather fuck an inhuman creature than a dude

This is legit cool tbh

 

[Gonthar]

Yes, Disney is now using drag queens in its movies...

 

[human304]

PrinceLuenLeoncur dude i dont generally hate blacks. the hate i have for them is because most blacks dont push back against things like these.

there are many pretty mixed race black stacies but they had to , had to cast a literal black tranny as a fairy and no black organization says anything.

 

[Deleted member 21735]

why is she black??? why do thewy always have to put a black character???

 

[Deleted member 17430]

why is she black??? why do they always have to put a black character???

I know. It's ridiculous. If they were making a period movie set in an African country, they'd never cast a white person to play African folklore characters. Because they'd know that's disrespectful to the culture. A bald black woman playing a European fairy is beyond nonsensical

 

[human304]

why Tchalla cant be white

 

[Enfant terrible]

mogged by del toro fairy

 

[gamma]

Jfl

 

[gamma]

At least they could get a pretty niggress.Very rare but still. Tf is that buzzcut shit

 

[Deleted member 17430]

At least they could get a pretty niggress.Very rare but still. Tf is that buzzcut shit

Facts

She ugly as sin

They could've gotten a pretty black fairy:

It'd still be inaccurate as fairies are European folklore, but at least it wouldn't be aesthetically unpleasant.

 

[misogino_celibe]

Solo tenían que elegir un foid negro que al menos fuera hnt, pero eligieron a ese transexual.

 

[Deleted member 17430]

Solo tenían que elegir un foid negro que al menos fuera hnt, pero eligieron a ese transexual.

You don't actually speak spanish, right?

 

[misogino_celibe]

You don't actually speak spanish, right?

Soy Argentino y si hablo español.

 

[Deleted member 17430]

Soy Argentino y si hablo español.

Then shouldn't you have said "Una foid negra?"

I assumed it was an english speaker who used google translate and the translator used a masculine article for "foid" because it doesn't know that foid means woman.

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

I'd be more attracted to the fairy from Del Toro's Pinocchio lol

I'd rather fuck an inhuman creature than a dude

Eh on this one ima just say I’ll sit out… neither look fucksble to me

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

PrinceLuenLeoncur dude i dont generally hate blacks. the hate i have for them is because most blacks dont push back against things like these.

there are many pretty mixed race black stacies but they had to , had to cast a literal black tranny as a fairy and no black organization says anything.

We have tried but there’s nothing we can do… we have literally 0 power dude, we are the weakest race financially and economically. We complain about this shit all the time but you don’t even know cos we are silenced (by Jew and cumskin) it is what it is.

And casting a mullato ironically causes these issues we don’t want fucking mullatos to represent you us piece of shit, if they did that blacks would complain saying we are being written out of media which is a big movement btw because of assholes like you askin for mutts

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

I know. It's ridiculous. If they were making a period movie set in an African country, they'd never cast a white person to play African folklore characters. Because they'd know that's disrespectful to the culture. A bald black woman playing a European fairy is beyond nonsensical

They do this because they feel bad. I dunno why whites do this tbh. I do get that blacks are integral to modern western culture but this is medieval setting, the only “non whites” should be Turks/Arabs, but nope they wouldn’t dare cast them in…

 

[human304]

Facts

She ugly as sin

They could've gotten a pretty black fairy:

It'd still be inaccurate as fairies are European folklore, but at least it wouldn't be aesthetically unpleasant.

i wont mind if this fairy comes by my bed at night

 

[Deleted member 19567]

I know. It's ridiculous. If they were making a period movie set in an African country, they'd never cast a white person to play African folklore characters. Because they'd know that's disrespectful to the culture. A bald black woman playing a European fairy is beyond nonsensical

Id have to disagree on this specific statement tbh. A lot of black characters are played as European if the character has a lot of greatness to it (ie the messiah, or other egyptian/african king figures like solomon)

I personally think they are doing this misrepresentation shit to piss people off though. Like op said before, they are like thousands and probably millions of black people they could have choose to playthe fairy, but they clearly picked some andro bald chick. Hollywood is wierd like this i noticed, they really do pick the most alien characters. Theyd tell you the look is "Exotic".

To me its just a big agenda at this point. Gay black guys, emasculation, mtf andro looks, chubby yet low bodyfat princesses, race war depictions. I mean, they cant be oblivious to what people think about what their doing. The people calling the shots arent kids and know exactly what their doing tbh. The bias is too strong.

 

[Deleted member 16203]

I'm sorry. She does.

When I first saw her, I legit thought it was a crossdressing fag. Wouldn't put it past disney since they've been going full woke lately.



Meanwhile the original fairy:

Just sad tbh, I hate the direction society is going.

They‘d be called racist if they cast a white guy as Black Panther but other way around is nice and good. Jfl

 

[human304]

We have tried but there’s nothing we can do… we have literally 0 power dude, we are the weakest race financially and economically. We complain about this shit all the time but you don’t even know cos we are silenced (by Jew and cumskin) it is what it is.

then how come blacks managed to burn down cities to protest for a fenatyl addict, who previously assaulted a pregnant woman?

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

then how come blacks managed to burn down cities to protest for a fenatyl addict, who previously assaulted a pregnant woman?

Because most were told a comforting lie by the media owned by Cumskins and Jews which spin the narrative behind the scenes hmm surprise surprise, once again blacks have 0 econ power wtf can they control? Even curries control more shit Than them blacks don’t even control the record labels they fucking make it’s some cumskin/Jew owning it and you expect us to have be leading shit? What a dumbass you are

 

[Deleted member 17430]

A lot of black characters are played as European if the character has a lot of greatness to it (ie the messiah, or other egyptian/african king figures like solomon)

None of those people were black.

Solomon was a jewish king from the middle east. He was not black. The messiah, Jesus Christ, was also Jewish and born in the middle east. Egyptians are the same. North Africans look like arabs, not blacks.

Besides, even in countries were people are darker skinned, the nobility is usually lighter skinned. Fair skin has historically been seen as a symbol of wealth and status across the entire world, Africa, Asia, Europe. The reason being the same. Those who work the fields get suntans, those who are giving orders, stay in the shade and remain untanned.

Since fair skin was a beauty standard associated with wealth and status, rich powerful people would choose to marry lighter skinned individuals and with the passing of generations, the upper class becomes significantly lighter skinned than the common people. This can be observed pretty much anywhere.

 

[Deleted member 19567]

None of those people were black.

Solomon was a jewish king from the middle east. He was not black. The messiah, Jesus Christ, was also Jewish and born in the middle east. Egyptians are the same. North Africans look like arabs, not blacks.

Besides, even in countries were people are darker skinned, the nobility is usually lighter skinned. Fair skin has historically been seen as a symbol of wealth and status across the entire world, Africa, Asia, Europe. The reason being the same. Those who work the fields get suntans, those who are giving orders, stay in the shade and remain untanned.

Since fair skin was a beauty standard associated with wealth and status, rich powerful people would choose to marry lighter skinned individuals and with the passing of generations, the upper class becomes significantly lighter skinned than the common people. This can be observed pretty much anywhere.

Were still arguing about the skin color? Carnal take, but just trying to be honest.
Most of the egyptians during those times were prob melinated dude. Get over it. The reason moses hid well in the midst of them as another ethnicity was likely because they were all melinated and had a dark skin tone, not royal family mulatto or white with a tan. Him, the royal family who adopted him, and the rest of the populace looked the same. You cannot suntan melanin. The reason in my OG post i said black is because im referring to melinated skin tone and shade.

Also, notice how im saying melinated. People try to trick cope and use those shabby images of just barely "melinated" skin tones that still would likely historically irl translate to a "black person". Even if we were talking about melinated middle eastern people (who look like black people anyways), it still proves my point. The shit you see in movies would prefer him to look like santa clause.

Also, pale skin would likely have been associated with leporasy. Also, the whole moses turning his arm into the color of leporasy thing was likely a big deal because he was melinated id think. The bible itself tells you he was likely melinated. burnished bronze is a shade of melinated skin. Dude, theirs jewish books written by akanazis themselves that let you know they were at least somewhat of a melinated populance as christipher columbus traced down certian islamic-hebrew speaking tribes to the native americans. They were melinated and looked "black". The western tribes in africa who are likely directly related to the same bible tribes are melinated. The haplogroup of shem even indicats that they were likely melinated.

Im not even going to bother to waste my time and source all my stuff with the links and book names because u can literally do a speck of unbiased research and at the very least see where im coming from. Do your own research yourself, or not. If it makes you happy to not, then so be it.

I hate talking about these subjects because they really dump down the conversation point. Continuing to discuss skin colors and such is really a dumb and carnal thing to do.

ANW, the bible also literally tells you how lots of ethnicities of peoples moved from one location to the next, and occupied other lands, yet your claiming isreal=arab/arab=isreal. Yet, americans in american are european and AA mullatos today, but was it not native americans a while ago? Dude, if the lineage stayed in isreal why are they records of the linage also being in lets say other parts of africa, and even some in early america. Or did you forget the many different bible storys that literally tell you how and where they moved from that place. Do you even read the bible?

 

[Deleted member 17430]

Were still arguing about the skin color? Most of the egyptians during those times were prob melinated dude. Get over it. The reason moses hid well in the midst of them as another ethnicity was because they were all melinated, not royal family mulatto.

Also, notice how im saying melinated. People like u would try to trick and use those shabby images of just barely "black" skin tones that still would likely historically irl translate to a "black person".

Also, pale skin would have been associated with leporasy FYI. History is weirder than we think. Also, the whole turning his arm into the color of leporasy thing moses did was a big deal because he was melinated id think. The bible itself tells you he was melinated. burnished bronze is a shade of melinated skin. Dude, theirs jewish books written by akanazis that let you know they were melinated as christipher columbus traced down hebrew speaking tribes to the native americans. They were melinated and looked "black". The tribes in africa lagos who are directly related to the same tribes are melinated. The haplogroup of shem even indicated that they were likely melinated.

Im not even going to bother to waste my time and source all my stuff with the links and book names because u can literally do a speck of unbiased research and at the very least see where im coming from. Do your own research yourself, or not. If it makes you happy to ignore the truths than so be it.

The bible also literally tells you how lots of ethnicities of peoples moved from one location to the next, and occupied other lands, yet your claiming isreal=arab. Yea, americans in american are european and mullatos today, but was it not native americans a while ago? Dude, if the lineage stayed in isreal why are they records of the linage also being in lets say Anambra, or early america. Or did you forget the many different bible storys that literally tell you how and where they moved from that place. Do you even read the bible?

Why should i even bother with this comment.

Wow, you sure are very confident about this. So much so that you made me doubt myself and I looked this stuff up. I went into it with an open mind spent a good 20 minutes researching. Couldn't really find anything supporting your claims. Everywhere I looked showed me that ancient jews and egyptians look semitic, no different than today.

You talk as if you were obviously right, and that it's ridiculous to even question you. But it looks like mainstream historians disagree with you.

Matter of fact, records show that Moses was getting bullied by his brothers for having married a black woman.

The reason moses hid well in the midst of them was because they were all melanated

Looks like it was actually because they were all olive skinned.

 

[Deleted member 19567]

Wow, you sure are very confident about this. So much so that you made me doubt myself and I looked this stuff up. I went into it with an open mind spent a good 20 minutes researching. Couldn't really find anything supporting your claims. Everywhere I looked showed me that ancient jews and egyptians look semitic, no different than today.

View attachment 2008976

You talk as if you were obviously right, and that it's ridiculous to even question you. But it looks like mainstream historians disagree with you.

Matter of fact, records show that Moses was getting bullied by his brothers for having married a black woman.

View attachment 2008978View attachment 2008979





Looks like it was actually because they were all olive skinned.

Dude, olives are black. They are no green people.

The cushites were forbidden to marry due to islamic customs. Its not a skin color difference, but a "gentile" (religious traditional upbringing) thing. Deuteronomy 7:2-5. Its forbidden in the torah to marry outside of tribes.

And like i said, your baised in your research. Its like your clearly looking for a point against my point, instead of actually using sense. I mean, if you want to pull up your understanding from opinions and interpretations from wikipidia, then do so. Like i said, if it makes you happy. Not trying to sound smart of anything, but bru.

I did months of research on this specific topic to be honest. And its literally too much evidence not only from the book of source that identifies the color but also from most other sources of accuracy. books from majorly accredited people like Ronald Sanders (July 7, 1932 – January 11, 1991) and just other truths over the years led me to that conclusion.

So imo if someone claims this and that from modern SEO top page wiki stuff, and pulls up silly illustrations of proof of lightskinned people during those times, i just see the same repetition of the same copers i met over the years that reinforce this sort of anti melanin topic. Melanin("black"), lack of(albino etc.) and mulatto. Its clear moses had melanin otherwise the writing of his hand turning white would make no sense. Also not sure why they are so hypocritical either, as even the pictures they use dont even show the skin color they say. Just like how in your wiki image you clearly see a santa clause moses, yet you claim they definitely were at least "olive colored (mulatto)". Just proves my and others point. And like i said, you cant suntan melanin. The whole olive skin tone thing is crazy to me anyways. The book people are talking about with its own words literally told you burnished bronze, and people literally have to cope so hard as to walk around that.

 

[Deleted member 19567]

Dude, olives are black. They are no green people.

The cushites were forbidden to marry due to islamic customs. Its not a skin color difference, but a "gentile" (religious traditional upbringing) thing. Deuteronomy 7:2-5. Its forbidden in the torah to marry outside of tribes.

And like i said, your baised in your research. Its like your clearly looking for a point against my point, instead of actually using sense. I mean, if you want to pull up your understanding from opinions and interpretations from wikipidia, then do so. Like i said, if it makes you happy. Not trying to sound smart of anything, but bru.

I did months of research on this specific topic to be honest. And its literally too much evidence not only from the book of source that identifies the color but also from most other sources of accuracy. books from majorly accredited people like Ronald Sanders (July 7, 1932 – January 11, 1991) and just other truths over the years led me to that conclusion.

So imo if someone claims this and that from modern SEO top page wiki stuff, and pulls up silly illustrations of proof of lightskinned people during those times, i just see the same repetition of the same copers i met over the years that reinforce this sort of anti melanin topic. Melanin("black"), lack of(albino etc.) and mulatto. Its clear moses had melanin otherwise the writing of his hand turning white would make no sense. Also not sure why they are so hypocritical either, as even the pictures they use dont even show the skin color they say. Just like how in your wiki image you clearly see a santa clause moses, yet you claim they definitely were at least "olive colored (mulatto)". Just proves my and others point. And like i said, you cant suntan melanin. The whole olive skin tone thing is crazy to me anyways. The ook people are talking about with its own words literally told you burnished bronze, and people literally have to cope so hard as to walk around that.

My last point

Does skin color affect salvation? No
Is the Hfather strictly ab the flesh? No
Does this race war, or anti melanin/anti white hate matter? No

Were all going to die one way or another. Even the people who dont think so at least admit that the flesh parasite system has to be transformed. The reason i typed that out is because i did the research to pretty much confirm my take to primarily be true. but whether its true that the messiah is black or white, it shouldnt matter really. And if it does, then too carnal and futile imo. The coverup and anti melanin take is what makes the people who baselessly claim otherwise, against common sense, suspicious imo.