The great gymcel debate

D

Deleted member 20179

Ramen noodles
Joined
Jun 15, 2022
Posts
1,463
Reputation
1,785
Many angles to look at this

1. Face, height, frame > muscles, so many look at zyzzmaxxing as unnecessary, even if it indeed boosts your PSL. It IS accepted that muscles are an add on boost, but not the main appeal in general.

2. Muscles=high sex appeal, so it’s key for tindermaxxing unless you have a legit chad face and height

3. Every time gymcelling is called out as cope, 10+ replies come from gymcels bragging about their mating success. Like clockwork

4. Leanmaxxing> bulking, so with below avg or even average genes, you pick one or the other, big or lean. Lean would be my personal choice here, I mean 10% lean.

5. Time required to build a good body. 1+ year easily maybe 2-3+ years natty. Sunk cost fallacy by gymcels or laziness by non gymcels

6. Lastly, some of rejecting gymcelling perhaps is simply laziness. Myself included here. Gymcelling requires TIME and EFFORT and DIETING, it asks a lot out of you and you have to be highly motivated





This isn’t very well organized by any means, but I’m attempting to stay neutral despite personally not gymcelling. This was a stream of consciousness, and possibly someone with a much higher IQ can formulate a better response
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 18244
All I know is that some subhuman incels genuinely try to convince themselves - and others - that skinnyfat ugly bastards > gymmaxxed ugly bastards.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 18244
Muscles > skinnyfat twerp
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top