The greatest conqueror in human history

[Deleted member 616]

 

[onnysk]

 

[Zygos4Life]

 

[FatJattMofo]

@Alarico8

 

[oldcell]

itS between Caesar or Genkhis Khan
Voted Caesar, this man was a geniu who never lost a war
He conquered Gauls, fought on harder conditions at foreighn country, dealt with Gnaeus Pompeius, he owned form womb to comb

Genkhis Khan had masses at his favor i think, and he conquered much bigger land, but i think his enemies were less capable than Caesars ones
Also i like Sulejman , but his father and grandfather already established favorable position fo him but he was great too
Also i dont think Fuhrer has a place between people like Hannibal, NApoleon and Alexander. but i sure understand why he is on list, logically
He was a great leader but bad general

 

[Deleted member 656]

Voted Caesar, this man was a geniu who never lost a war

He lost the most important war; the war against the Norwood Reaper

He owned form womb to comb

He did nothing of significance until he was middle aged

Of those named it's probably Alexander the Great. Hannibal was the best general of those listed but never actually conquered anything.

Augustus mogs all.

 

[Effortless]

Probably these two tbh

 

[Time Travel]

View attachment 183269

 

[oldcell]

He lost the most important war; the war against the Norwood Reaper


He did nothing of significance until he was middle aged

Of those named it's probably Alexander the Great. Hannibal was the best general of those listed but never actually conquered anything.

Augustus mogs all.

Lol alsmost puked about norwood
He did but its less known dealed with pirates who captured him when he was young it was brutal
Yeah Hannibal and Alexander was arguably best generals, maybe Napoleon too, but overall as politician, leader and general i voted for Caesar

 

[Deleted member 1551]

i am Austrian what do you think who´ll i vote for jfl

 

[Deleted member 1464]

Zyzz

 

[KEy21]

Probably Hitler honestly..

6 months away from taking over the modern world with a based ideology is much more impressive than any hack and slash revised history.

 

[Deleted member 656]

He did but its less known dealed with pirates who captured him when he was young it was brutal

He delt with a single group of pirates after they took him prisoner. Pompey purged the entire Mediterranean of pirates in six months.

as a politician

Meh

as a leader

Sure

as a general

Maybe

 

[oldcell]

Probably Hitler honestly..

6 months away from taking over the modern world with is a based ideology is much more impressive than any hack and slash revised history.

Sure..he is maybe best as a leader, who can influence masses, but shit general

 

[LordNorwood]

Tough choice but ima go with my nigga Alexander

 

[Arkantos]

 

[OldRooster]

Tbh had to Bing Sulieman the magnificent. Didn't vote because I am not knowledgeable enough to have a strong opinion. But style points to G. Khan for impregnating so many women.

 

[Blackout.xl]

Where’s Idi Amin?

 

[Deleted member 1751]

Genghis Khan fanclub

 

[Zygos4Life]

Bump

 

[Deleted member 4438]

WHERE IS MOHAMED YOU FAGOT

YOU ARE LOW IQ?

 

[Zygos4Life]

WHERE IS MOHAMED YOU FAGOT

YOU ARE LOW IQ?

Suleiman the Magnificent mogs

 

[DrunkenSailor]

Rasputin with his 25 cm dick

 

[prettyboycel]

itS between Caesar or Genkhis Khan
Voted Caesar, this man was a geniu who never lost a war
He conquered Gauls, fought on harder conditions at foreighn country, dealt with Gnaeus Pompeius, he owned form womb to comb

Genkhis Khan had masses at his favor i think, and he conquered much bigger land, but i think his enemies were less capable than Caesars ones
Also i like Sulejman , but his father and grandfather already established favorable position fo him but he was great too
Also i dont think Fuhrer has a place between people like Hannibal, NApoleon and Alexander. but i sure understand why he is on list, logically
He was a great leader but bad general

False, mongol numbers were greatly exagerated. In reality, his numbers were far lesser than his opponents.
Also, his opponents were far, far more powerful than caesar. Jin dinasty was far more developed than european countries at the time. He annihilated beijing, and the kharizmian dinasty as well which was extremely rich and powerful,
Caesar only conquered barbaric tribes and his roman opponents.

 

[prettyboycel]

It is without any doubts Genghis Khan.
He started in a small mongol tribe, his father was assassinated, and he went on and conquered the greatest empires at the time and had the most powerful, almost invincible army.
He assembled all mongol tribes, defeated mongols nemesis, the tatars, defeated china, greatest military power at the time, persian empire, etc... and created biggest empire of all time.
Alexander the great was given the most military efficient army at the time by his father, and conquered an already weakened persian empire. Thats it.
Ceasar conquered a bunch of barbaric tribes.

Only conqueror who would be comparable to Genghis Khan is Cyrus the great, who also started from a small pastoral tribe and conquered all his neighbors to create the largest empire had ever seen at that time.

 

[Lev Peshkov]

Khan caused rice cels to conquer Asia so not him kek

 

[Patrick Baitman]

Talleyrand or Henry Kissinger

 

[AlexanderTheGreat]

NO. ONE. MOGGED.
ME​

 

[Deleted member 3702]

where is Mehmet II The Conqueror? he literally conquered Rome(Constantinople)

 

[Gosick]

Probably Alexander the Great, Hitler and then Caeser/Napoleon

 

[Deleted member 40471]

Lol no kalid or Cyrus on the list

 

[Hardrada]

Harald Hardrada

 

[Hardrada]

Probably Alexander the Great, Hitler and then Caeser/Napoleon

napoleon didnt do shit

 

[CFW432]

Babur just to piss off dindus.

 

[Deleted member 40471]

Babur just to piss off dindus.

It never began for Egyptian mamluks

 

[CFW432]

It never began for Egyptian mamluks

Weren't mamluks blacks?

 

[Deleted member 40471]

Weren't mamluks blacks?

Origin from Central Asia.
Pushed to Middle East and sold as slaves so probably west asian pheno