J
johnny4612
Bronze
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2023
- Posts
- 489
- Reputation
- 253
Women have no intention of knowing or understanding what a man in his position really does, how he got there, and how he behaves.
Have you ever seen a woman excitedly say, "Hey girls, I was invited by John," and her friends reply, "Who, the StarsBlue hockey coach?" ... "Yes! Him..."
So, women literally workship the fairytale. They idealize men in positions of status. But I think that's different from normal "idealizing."
Women will know the difference between a "Cashier" and a "Cop," and will automatically attribute all the necessary qualities to him.
If he's a cashier, then he'll automatically be poor, dirty, and low ranking.
While if he's a cop or a firefighter, then he'll be strong, save lives, brave, and sexy.
That said, women can't really see that the cashier is actually sexy, brave, clean, and has a high-masculine attitude, while other men are the opposite.
Have you ever heard women say, "No, you're wrong! We see personality too; in fact, it's the most important thing," yet YOU SEE THEM YOURSELF, WITH YOUR OWN EYES, dating men like the policeman, or the firefighter, or the CEO, and in reality, some of these men are thieves, insecure, fearful, delusional, and arrogant?
The other day I was talking to a woman about a man I don't like because he's a snake and a thief in business and is currently the CEO of a small company. So I've tested her. I wanted to hear what she had to say first... And you know what?
She described him to me as capable, intelligent, and a good thinker.
If you knew what this man is capable of doing every day, you'd shudder. And yet, women think of him that way, just because of the position he holds.
So, the question and the issue would be this:
If women choose the men they like most, out of personal preference, in positions of status like policeman, firefighter, CEO, etc., and they don't chose the cashier, janitor, or any other low status man, once they choose them and apply the label to them by idealizing them, will these women attribute these qualities to him for life, or can they truly see who that man is once they've entered into a relationship with him?
Do you see what I mean?
It's like if a friend of yours drove a Ferrari, then you'd automatically assume he was a rich man, but once you enter his circle of friends, you learn from him that the car is rented daily, on certain days.
And that he lives in his parents' basement.
Now, I wonder, what do women do when they find out this? Do they still stay with a man because he is still a success in society, it has "that role" (or at least it seems so, from what we have learned) rather than leaving him for someone else of lower status but actually a solid man??
Are men judged and worshiped to be solid just because of their status position in society rather than their actual qualities?
Have you ever seen a woman excitedly say, "Hey girls, I was invited by John," and her friends reply, "Who, the StarsBlue hockey coach?" ... "Yes! Him..."
So, women literally workship the fairytale. They idealize men in positions of status. But I think that's different from normal "idealizing."
Women will know the difference between a "Cashier" and a "Cop," and will automatically attribute all the necessary qualities to him.
If he's a cashier, then he'll automatically be poor, dirty, and low ranking.
While if he's a cop or a firefighter, then he'll be strong, save lives, brave, and sexy.
That said, women can't really see that the cashier is actually sexy, brave, clean, and has a high-masculine attitude, while other men are the opposite.
Have you ever heard women say, "No, you're wrong! We see personality too; in fact, it's the most important thing," yet YOU SEE THEM YOURSELF, WITH YOUR OWN EYES, dating men like the policeman, or the firefighter, or the CEO, and in reality, some of these men are thieves, insecure, fearful, delusional, and arrogant?
The other day I was talking to a woman about a man I don't like because he's a snake and a thief in business and is currently the CEO of a small company. So I've tested her. I wanted to hear what she had to say first... And you know what?
She described him to me as capable, intelligent, and a good thinker.
If you knew what this man is capable of doing every day, you'd shudder. And yet, women think of him that way, just because of the position he holds.
So, the question and the issue would be this:
If women choose the men they like most, out of personal preference, in positions of status like policeman, firefighter, CEO, etc., and they don't chose the cashier, janitor, or any other low status man, once they choose them and apply the label to them by idealizing them, will these women attribute these qualities to him for life, or can they truly see who that man is once they've entered into a relationship with him?
Do you see what I mean?
It's like if a friend of yours drove a Ferrari, then you'd automatically assume he was a rich man, but once you enter his circle of friends, you learn from him that the car is rented daily, on certain days.
And that he lives in his parents' basement.
Now, I wonder, what do women do when they find out this? Do they still stay with a man because he is still a success in society, it has "that role" (or at least it seems so, from what we have learned) rather than leaving him for someone else of lower status but actually a solid man??
Are men judged and worshiped to be solid just because of their status position in society rather than their actual qualities?
