The history of Europe summarized in a single paragraph.

wtf prompted that response? what the fuck do i have to do with pedophilia and cannibalism im not the one posting murderers as examples you schizo fuck
Ofcourse you didn't said anything about rape here, you sick fuck.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Big White Cuck
  • +1
Reactions: Big White Cuck
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 17872 and StrangerDanger
brachycephaly is subhuman
 
wets water
Was looking to read some stuff on cephalic index shit
Wtf is this
Images 1

Dolis are palatecels?
 
  • +1
Reactions: StrangerDanger
Enlighten me on the importance of cephalic index master
Read the thread and ask your assigned mentor @Shieda_Kayn if any questions arises
your despair is not my responsibility
 
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: Shieda_Kayn and Deleted member 16275
  • Hmm...
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 17872 and Deleted member 16369
  • JFL
Reactions: StrangerDanger
@StrangerDanger
1f1f261985626a0557a6acba83af9cff.jpg

what skull shape is sean o pry?
 
  • +1
Reactions: StrangerDanger
  • +1
Reactions: AscendingHero and Deleted member 21062
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 22126 and StrangerDanger
Not at all, you can have a proportionally wide skull that offset by sagittal skull length. Look at Neanderthal skulls or heavily cromagnon phenotypes such as Paleoatlantids/Tydals, they have wide robust faces but still have a low cephalic index and is dolichocephslic because of their skull length
Assume a dolichocephalic individual has a skull length of around 210mm
View attachment 2025447
0.749 * 210 = 157mm
It allows for a head breadth of 157mm, which is not by any means narrow. A headbreath of 157mm on a dolichocephalic skull also allows for greater facial/bizygomatic width than it would on a brachycephalic individual as the skull is shaped differently, the widest point on a brachycephalic skull is found at the center of the skull behind the ears and is noticably wider than the bizygomatic width where as dolichocephalic skulls remain more perpendicular on the sides. See how the widest points are located differently
View attachment 2025449
Does Cavill have a narrow face?
View attachment 2025453View attachment 2025455
He would never had the Superman role if his skull was compressed like an infantile
And that cartoon proves what exactly? Your theory is based on a drawing jfl

Look at these doli moggers bro! Look how their alien skull makes their zygos and jaws so strong!

1196424 xafladiishirka57Somali jpg476fad74cba27501726f85231ba4a3c6
2020 04 01 somalia2
771986 IZhZJ jpgabdc3bef7b3a3063367d6b2e1e935a79
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 17872
Do you think palate is also correlated? Most PSL gods do not have a wide palate to my knowledge and are also meso.
That's cope. A true narrow palate causes a host of bad issues. What moggers don't have is an artificially wide palate that comes from SARPE or other procedures.

Someone like Cavill looks like he has a narrow palate but if you look his palate gets wider and wider toward the back. It's just that a parabolic palate shape narrows a bit toward the canines, but the parabolic shape is due to good sagittal growth as it is.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 21062
Do you think palate is also correlated? Most PSL gods do not have a wide palate to my knowledge and are also meso.
Probably but I have no idea regards how the palate correlates to cephaly
And that cartoon proves what exactly? Your theory is based on a drawing jfl

Look at these doli moggers bro! Look how their alien skull allowed makes their zygos and jaws so strong!

View attachment 2025845View attachment 2025847View attachment 2025848
What does this have to with anything. First of all their sagital skull length isnt shown and they’re downward grown. Go ahead and cherrypick how many East africans you want, it does not change the fact that attractive people have doli to mesocephalic skulls whereas more infantalized reduced phenotypes are brachycephalic.
Brachy = game over
 
  • +1
Reactions: AscendingHero
Notice how his intermolar is significantly wider than his intercanine width
Cf9d83a7d877952cbaf606c7332642c1  henry cavill future husband
 
  • +1
Reactions: AscendingHero, KingBetaTut and Deleted member 22126
What does this have to with anything. First of all their sagital skull length isnt shown and they’re downward grown.

Somalis are known for being dolichocephalic so cope even more. Clearly they are doli anyway because with such weak temporal width they couldnt be brachy
Go ahead and cherrypick how many East africans you want, it does not change the fact that attractive people have doli to mesocephalic skulls whereas more infantalized reduced phenotypes are brachycephalic.
Brachy = game over
Meanwhile you've posted no brachycephalic incels while everyone else has posted dolichocephalic skullcels
 
  • +1
Reactions: Big White Cuck
It's not about doli or brachy anyway. Doli can mog if the skull has good sagittal length from a strong brow. If you're doli and have a large alien occipital region your neck looks small and you look more neotenous and peanut headed.

Whereas a thick necked doli will have a mogger brow and a more flattish occiput. It's not about the cephalic index so much as it is forward growth/ sagittal growth where it matters. So long as you have a tall skull and not a low flat head (which is feminine), a long maxilla (parabolic shapes give the mandible more room to slide forward), a heavy brow, good nose bridge, and projected cheeks, how wide your neurocranium is isn't that important
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Big White Cuck, AscendingHero and Deleted member 17872
Somalis are known for being dolichocephalic so cope even more. Clearly they are doli anyway because with such weak temporal width they couldnt be brachy

Meanwhile you've posted no brachycephalic incels while everyone else has posted dolichocephalic skullcels
Did you even read the thread
Just use a completly irrelevant distinct group of people with a completly different skull shapes than the cromagnon derived dolicephals of europe theorem
Not to mentiom that this argument is completly irrelevant but the problem has nothing to do with their sagital skull length, it’s everything else. There is zero advantage of having a sagitally short cranium
 
  • +1
Reactions: AscendingHero and Shieda_Kayn
Did you even read the thread
Just use a completly irrelevant distinct group of people with a completly different skull shapes than the cromagnon derived dolicephals of europe theorem
Not to mentiom that this argument is completly irrelevant but the problem has nothing to do with their sagital skull length, it’s everything else. There is zero advantage of having a sagitally short cranium
Nobody said shit about sagittaly short cranium numbnuts. I clearly said a skull that has both length AND width will have more presence and masculinity than a skull with just length. Nobody said be a deformed cradle headed Slav. This isn't where guy's heads are super short from to back and super wide from being laid flat as babies. That's a deformity. But if you have a 210mm length skull you will be brachy if you have more width.

Whatever it doesn't matter because this is such a small part of aesthetics. But acting like a guy will be failoed if his cranium grows in ALL directions is cope
 
  • +1
Reactions: Big White Cuck
It's not about doli or brachy anyway. Doli can mog if the skull has good sagittal length from a strong brow. If you're doli and have a large alien occipital region your neck looks small and you look more neotenous and peanut headed.

Whereas a thick necked doli will have a mogger brow and a more flattish occiput. It's not about the cephalic index so much as it is forward growth/ sagittal growth where it matters. So long as you have a tall skull and not a low flat head (which is feminine), a long maxilla (parabolic shapes give the mandible more room to slide forward), a heavy brow, good nose bridge, and projected cheeks, how wide your neurocranium is isn't that important
You don’t want a flat occiput and it’s gonna be difficult to find dolis without as there are clear patterns.
The thing is that proportions matter, just because you in absolute measurements have a large sagittal distance does not mean that you benefit from it as aesthetically as someone who has a proportionally longer skull than it is wide. That would just give you a LARGER skull like the balloon inflated borreby.
A sagitally long skull WILL be dolichocephalic in almost every case unless you have an abnormally wide face which would failo you in otherways.
Do you except men to have 155mm PLUS facial widths? 143-150mm facial width is well above average and would render someone with a sagitally long skull as dolichocephalic.
1672812540881
1672812612090

Cavill and Drago for example already already have wide enough faces, but yet if you look at them in 3D when they turn their heads around you will visually see how much their skull length triumphs their facial width despite their faces already being wide
 
  • +1
Reactions: AscendingHero
You don’t want a flat occiput and it’s gonna be difficult to find dolis without as there are clear patterns.
The thing is that proportions matter, just because you in absolute measurements have a large sagittal distance does not mean that you benefit from it as aesthetically as someone who has a proportionally longer skull than it is wide. That would just give you a LARGER skull like the balloon inflated borreby.
A sagitally long skull WILL be dolichocephalic in almost every case unless you have an abnormally wide face which would failo you in otherways.
Do you except men to have 155mm PLUS facial widths? 143-150mm facial width is well above average and would render someone with a sagitally long skull as dolichocephalic.
View attachment 2025866View attachment 2025872
Cavill and Drago for example already already have wide enough faces, but yet if you look at them in 3D when they turn their heads around you will visually see how much their skull length triumphs their facial width despite their faces already being wide
this nigga has a small head wtf. Proof that neurocranium is cope. What you need is facial bones

I am hyperdoli and have wide cheeks, narrow temples, and decent jaw height and width. But these facial features grew over time. I was always hyperdoli but now have better facial proportions whereas before they were shit
 
I clearly said a skull that has both length AND width will have more presence and masculinity than a skull with just length. That's a deformity. But if you have a 210mm length skull you will be brachy if you have more width.
Just have 170mm skull width theorem
Cavill need a couple centimeters more width
 
  • +1
Reactions: AscendingHero
I am hyperdoli and have wide cheeks, narrow temples, and decent jaw height and width. But these facial features grew over time. I was always hyperdoli but now have better facial proportions whereas before they were shit
Good then you should know that wide cheeks doesnt cancel out the cephalic index of a sagitally long skull unless the width is abnormally wide.
Facial bones are obviously important yes, but its still tied to the rest of your cranium development. The cranium determines your genetic potential, a sagitally long skull will accentuate your bones like its on roids and give you the heroic look versus a brachycephalic skull that will never have such an effect. Slapping a jaw implant for instance on a sagitally long skull would look way better and more natural than on a short skull.
1672814321485
 
  • +1
Reactions: AscendingHero and KingBetaTut
stupid ass gook helmet hair

img]

3233348_1672792300707.png
 
19th century anthropologist moment
 
The pyramids were built by meditarian looking people. Not niggas.
Ancient Egyptians were 10% SSA. So black by American standards.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Big White Cuck and PrinceLuenLeoncur
Ancient Egyptians were 10% SSA. So black by American standards.
I've watched a fair number of videos about the dna analysis of ancient Egyptian mommies and what you're saying isn't true.

Let's say you were correct. The other 90% is European. So, it makes zero sense to claim they were black when they're only 10% SSA. The majority of their genome is white. Thus, they're white with some admixture.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 17872
Let's say you were correct. The other 90% is European. So, it makes zero sense. The majority of their genome is white. Thus, they're white with some admixture.
I was just memeing about them being black but u r legit retarded if you think Althey were Europeans. Every legit study says they were closely related to modern Middle Easterners.

The results suggest that the ancient Egyptians were most closely related to the peoples of the Near East, particularly from the Levant.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...IQFnoECDoQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0K162aGX8loiXi7nQ2JAed

@PrinceLuenLeoncur @TRUE_CEL
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Big White Cuck and chaddyboi66
History of Europe: Serbians saved it from becoming an ethnic Islamic caliphate
History of Europe: Ottomans buttfucked everyone until Matrix changed 1 to 0
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 17872
Keep coping.



That's just a fake claim by a private company. Actual scientist say the claim is false.

Swiss genomics company iGENEA has launched a Tutankhamen DNA project based on what they say are genetic markers that appeared on a computer screen during a Discovery Channel special on the famous pharaoh's genetic lineage.


But Carsten Pusch, a geneticist at Germany's University of Tubingen who was part of the team that unraveled Tut's DNA from samples taken from his mummy and mummies of his family members, said that iGENEA's claims are "simply impossible." Pusch and his colleagues published part of their results, though not the Y-chromosome DNA, in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) in 2010. The Y chromosome is the sex chromosome found only in males, and looking at the genes in this chromosome would show Tut's male lineage.
"Maybe they didn't know what they showed, but we got 16 markers from the Y chromosome from these pharaohs," Roman Scholz, the managing director of iGENEA, told LiveScience.


https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...YQFnoECCsQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0ldH7oyOCFAxonNeQxkHmF


Jfl at white trashnalists try to claim everyone as white because they are insecure of their own culture.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Big White Cuck and PrinceLuenLeoncur
"Every legit study says they were closely related to modern Middle Easterners."

You just refuted your own argument. Middle Easterns and Europeans are both the same race. So, it's apart of our inheritance.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: chaddyboi66, Deleted member 23778 and Deleted member 17872
"Every legit study says they were closely related to modern Middle Easterners."
You just refuted your own argument. Middle Easterns and Europeans are both the same race. So, it's apart of our inheritance.
In your fucking dreams. Jfl. Race is a social construct. Nobody considers ME as White.

Are you even white? Whites hates Middle Easterners the most.

@Ja-Ja Gabori
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 23778 and PrinceLuenLeoncur
In your fucking dreams. Jfl. Race is a social construct. Nobody considers ME as White.

Are you even white? Whites hates Middle Easterners the most.

@Ja-Ja Gabori
Race is a social construct bro!

Middle easterns hate white Europeans, bro!
But Muhammed, their prophet of worship was a white man. Hahaha. Keep coping.

'While we were sitting with the Prophet (ﷺ) in the mosque, a man came riding on a camel. He made his camel kneel down in the mosque, tied its foreleg and then said: "Who amongst you is Muhammad?" At that time the Prophet (ﷺ) was sitting amongst us (his companions) leaning on his arm. We replied, "This white man reclining on his arm." The man then addressed him, "O Son of `Abdul Muttalib." The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "I am here to answer your questions.'
 
"Jurairi reported:I said to Abu Tufail: Did you see Allah's Messenger ( ‌صلی ‌اللہ ‌علیہ ‌وسلم ‌ )? He said: Yes, he had a white handsome face. Muslim b. Hajjaj said: Abu Tufail who died in 100 Hijra was the last of the Companions of Allah's Messenger ( ‌صلی ‌اللہ ‌علیہ ‌وسلم ‌ ). "


Hahaha.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 16371
I was just memeing about them being black but u r legit retarded if you think Althey were Europeans. Every legit study says they were closely related to modern Middle Easterners.



https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...IQFnoECDoQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0K162aGX8loiXi7nQ2JAed

@PrinceLuenLeoncur @TRUE_CEL
He’s a Cumskin KANG “WE WERZES KINGS AND STUFF GOLLY GEEE” type cumskin. Whites can’t be happy with greeece and rome they also need Egypt what an abhorrent group
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Big White Cuck, Deleted member 16275, Deleted member 17872 and 1 other person
Race is a social construct bro!

Middle easterns hate white Europeans, bro!
But Muhammed, their prophet of worship was a white man. Hahaha. Keep coping.

'While we were sitting with the Prophet (ﷺ) in the mosque, a man came riding on a camel. He made his camel kneel down in the mosque, tied its foreleg and then said: "Who amongst you is Muhammad?" At that time the Prophet (ﷺ) was sitting amongst us (his companions) leaning on his arm. We replied, "This white man reclining on his arm." The man then addressed him, "O Son of `Abdul Muttalib." The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "I am here to answer your questions.'
Sandnigs (farmers) and Whites (hunter gatherers) literally descend from different populations
 
  • +1
Reactions: Big White Cuck and Deleted member 17872

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top