The hypocrisy on skin color

D

Deleted member 28541

Banned
Joined
Apr 11, 2023
Posts
525
Reputation
676
Most people here agree that men with red hair are less attractive then men with darker hair simply because of the color of the hairs but yet a lot here say its cope and racism if you say a skin color is more attractive then the other to women because of the color even tho the skin covers the entire body and it covers more area then head hair which means the feature is more important.
 
  • Ugh..
  • +1
Reactions: The Grinch and Deleted member 23558
white is ideal for females light brown ideal for males. hair colour doesnt matter if its brown or black
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 28541
It’s not but retards here think having Dracula pale skin mogs

Skin is much more subjective than hair as long as it’s not shitskin
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: The Grinch, Rimaxtis and Deleted member 23558
white is ideal for females light brown ideal for males. hair colour doesnt matter if its brown or black
Light brown ain't the most attractive in men.
White to slightly tanned with red undertones is the best color.
 
Light brown ain't the most attractive in men.
White to slightly tanned with red undertones is the best color.

All the attractive whites tan to light brown for a reason ofc subhumans look bad in every colour. But chad whites are blackpilled on being light brown. People here say it’s not brown but olive but there’s no such thing as tanning giving olive to one race and brown to others. They just have different undertones due to eating certain foods and taking certain supps. Some whites can’t even tan cause they get red and sunburnt . Those are the gigasubhumans of the white race.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Eren

Similar threads

crypsis
Replies
15
Views
79
crypsis
crypsis
GenerationalAutism
Replies
5
Views
34
GenerationalAutism
GenerationalAutism
160cmcurry
Replies
6
Views
68
160cmcurry
160cmcurry
_Nazareth_
Replies
8
Views
83
_Nazareth_
_Nazareth_

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top