The idea of "betabuxxing" is usually, but not always, cope by poor people

B

brutal_blackpill

Kraken
Joined
Dec 25, 2019
Posts
3,409
Reputation
5,498
90% of the rich men dating girls, even if not good looking, are not being betabuxxed. Money makes someone more attractive. If you actually have very rich friends, you will see that the idea of being high status and wealthy physically attracts women. The examples of betabuxx only include very ugly or short men, but these are not as common as you think, and I'd say that perhaps this applies to 10% of rich men (although even 10% is probably too high)

Everything in attraction that comes from a woman is based on status. Status includes wealth but looks are also a part of your status. Even good looks are fundamentally based in status, in that, having a good looking boyfriend is something you can show off to your friends. Like I already said, women have a lower sex drive, and so although looks are important, they're not the utmost important. So the allure of showing off a good looking friend to your friends and getting clout for that is even more important than her actual lust for that man.

Women lust for clout, attention, and status much moreso than any sort of innate sex drive. Dating a good looking man, a rich man, a high status man, a powerful one, all get you that attention. They're all part of the same equation. If you don't understand this, you're the one bluepilled, not me.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 30411, fogdart, TheChosenChad and 13 others
90% of the rich men dating girls, even if not good looking, are not being betabuxxed. Money makes someone more attractive. If you actually have very rich friends, you will see that the idea of being high status and wealthy physically attracts women. The examples of betabuxx only include very ugly men, but these are not as common as you think.

Everything in attraction that comes from a woman is based on status. Status includes wealth but so do looks. Even good looks are fundamentally based in status, in that, having a good looking boyfriend is something you can show off to your friends. Like I already said, women have a lower sex drive, and so although looks are important, they're not the utmost important. So the allure of showing off a good looking friend to your friends and getting clout for that is even more important than her actual lust for that man. Women lust for clout, attention, and status much moreso than any sort of innate sex drive. If you don't understand this, you're the one bluepilled, not me.

Legit. I think money and status can create raw attraction BUT only to a reduced extent. You can't rest on them if you're below average in looks.
 
  • +1
Reactions: TheChosenChad, Deleted member 10104, Deleted member 10524 and 2 others
Legit. I think money and status can create raw attraction BUT only to a reduced extent. You can't rest on them if you're below average in looks.
Agreed, and I'd argue you only need to be about a 3-4+/10 for money and status to be enough to propel you hard. The examples of "betabuxxing" that people use are almost always 70+ year old men or 1/10 men.
 
  • +1
Reactions: fogdart and diggbicc
True, but the women will not inherently be attracted to you like they would with looks. Your looks are an inherent part of you(not including aging) and when women are attracted to your looks, you feel as if they are inherently attracted to you. Which fuels your validation.
 
  • +1
Reactions: TheChosenChad, Danish_Retard, diggbicc and 2 others
Agreed, and I'd argue you only need to be about a 3-4+/10 for money and status to be enough to propel you hard. The examples of "betabuxxing" that people use are almost always 70+ year old men or 1/10 men.

- how masculine the guy looks
- how old the girl is
- how mentally stable the girl is (girls with typical Alpha Fucks/ Beta Bucks behaviors are mentally unstable;)
- how good looking the girl is

There are many factors that come into play when considering if some guy is just "betabuxxing".

If let's say a high-earning incel looking guy become a low T cuck in his old age and marry an unattractive post prime slut, he just screams a beta cuck provider. Why? The slut spends their prime years getting railed for free by all the chads of this world but when she gets older, she becomes more desperate and lower her standards and settle with the rich, less attractive beta guy. Now if instead a rich man uses his money to attract and have sex with young hot girls, is he a beta buxx? I don't think so. The man avoids AF/BB principle if he only goes for young, mentally stable girls. Yes, he's a provider, but the girl is in her prime years. If a cute girl spends her prime sexual years on you, you live like a chad. You're a true winner.
 
  • +1
Reactions: TheChosenChad, Deleted member 9090, quakociaptockh and 1 other person
- how masculine the guy looks
- how old the girl is
- how mentally stable the girl is (girls with typical Alpha Fucks/ Beta Bucks behaviors are mentally unstable;)
- how good looking the girl is

There are many factors that come into play when considering if some guy is just "betabuxxing".

If let's say a high-earning incel looking guy become a low T cuck in his old age and marry an unattractive post prime slut, he just screams a beta cuck provider. Why? The slut spends their prime years getting railed for free by all the chads of this world but when she gets older, she becomes more desperate and lower her standards and settle with the rich, less attractive beta guy. Now if instead a rich man uses his money to attract and have sex with young hot girls, is he a beta buxx? I don't think so. The man avoids AF/BB principle if he only goes for young, mentally stable girls. Yes, he's a provider, but the girl is in her prime years. If a cute girl spends her prime sexual years on you, you live like a chad. You're a true winner.
Its a viable option, but still betabuxxing. Money/status will not make women crave you on a primal level like looks will.
 
  • +1
Reactions: TheChosenChad, Danish_Retard, Deleted member 9090 and 1 other person
*ugly people
 
Its a viable option, but still betabuxxing. Money/status will not make women crave you on a primal level like looks will.

Rich guys like Dan Bilzerian always surrounded by women, those are the 9/10s that he wouldn't get them without money. I'm sure that his sex life is indistinguishable from good looking men. The primal craving is exaggerated. IRL women can be a loyal wife and good mother even if they don't crave men.
 
  • +1
Reactions: fogdart and Deleted member 10104
Rich guys like Dan Bilzerian always surrounded by women, those are the 9/10s that he wouldn't get them without money. I'm sure that his sex life is indistinguishable from good looking men. The primal craving is exaggerated. IRL women can be a loyal wife and good mother even if they don't crave men.
Dan Bilzerian is a prime example of betabuxxing. He wouldnt be smashing any women without money and none of them are attracted him.

Aside from looks, nothing will give a woman that primal attraction.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Danish_Retard and Deleted member 9090
Rich guys like Dan Bilzerian always surrounded by women, those are the 9/10s that he wouldn't get them without money. I'm sure that his sex life is indistinguishable from good looking men. The primal craving is exaggerated. IRL women can be a loyal wife and good mother even if they don't crave men.
he paid to have sex with them
 
  • +1
Reactions: Danish_Retard
Dan Bilzerian is a prime example of betabuxxing. He wouldnt be smashing any women without money and none of them are attracted him.

Aside from looks, nothing will give a woman that primal attraction.

You want to just speculate out of thin air that very good looking men can sleep with any woman in the world for free. It's all bullshit. Many girls will never sleep with a man , no matter how good looking he is, if he doesn't demonstrate high values other than his looks.
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: Yliaster and Danish_Retard
You want to just speculate out of thin air that very good looking men can sleep with any woman in the world for free. It's all bullshit. Many girls will never sleep with a man , no matter how good looking he is, if he doesn't demonstrate high values other than his looks.
Yes but not through money. Through NT, which almost everyone is. Women will not be attracted to a rich ugly guy. They will only be attracted to his money. Once thats gone, theyre gone too.

A good looking man can sleep with many more women with a rich man can, and those women will genuinely attracted to him. While the rich man has to buy her Louis Vuitton bags and Gucci purses every time they fuck.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Danish_Retard
betabuxxer cope
 
Yes but not through money. Through NT, which almost everyone is. Women will not be attracted to a rich ugly guy. They will only be attracted to his money. Once thats gone, theyre gone too.

A good looking man can sleep with many more women with a rich man can, and those women will genuinely attracted to him. While the rich man has to buy her Louis Vuitton bags and Gucci purses every time they fuck.

LMAO what, you think that a random non-famous good looking man can sleep with more women than a rich man. Heck there's even guys like k-Pop gay shit BTS members that should be invisible who have legions of female admirers all around the world. They have the ability to sleep with more women than an average Chad can. Money and Status >>> Looks
 
  • +1
Reactions: Yliaster
You want to just speculate out of thin air that very good looking men can sleep with any woman in the world for free. It's all bullshit. Many girls will never sleep with a man , no matter how good looking he is, if he doesn't demonstrate high values other than his looks.

And yet that's literally the philosophy of most people on this forum.They genuinely believe that if they looksmax to the hills and back,that every JBW will bow before their mighty PSL theory.Which of course is a cope.The thing is that because they have dog shit personalities and no social circle,they strive for PSL with the hopes that their looks will do all of the work for them in getting any woman they want without having to make any effort lmao.What a hilarious place this forum is
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6341
Yes but not through money. Through NT, which almost everyone is. Women will not be attracted to a rich ugly guy. They will only be attracted to his money. Once thats gone, theyre gone too.

A good looking man can sleep with many more women with a rich man can, and those women will genuinely attracted to him. While the rich man has to buy her Louis Vuitton bags and Gucci purses every time they fuck.

bro women do not give a fck about good looking or rich guys.They only care first and foremost about themselves.The rich guy and the good looking guy to women are basically just a means to and end to afford them certian priviliges that wouldn't otherwise have.

For example: Women want a good looking guy so that they can show him off to the world and to their friends on social media to display their high SMV and in the process making other girls jealous,which is like food to women.

The rich guy (Status) imo is even more valuable to women than the good looking guy,because he can afford anything their narcissistic whims are inclined to experience.He can take them on vacations,buy them all the expensive fashion they like etc etc etc.

Women are tyrants who use their smelly coochie to leverage power from men.They do not give a fck about Chad,Tyrone or men general.Men to women are just means to end.Whereas with men,most of them would kill their mothers just for a chance to sniff Stacy's coochie.Nature is cruel.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6341
Women lust for clout, attention, and status much moreso than any sort of innate sex drive. Dating a good looking man, a rich man, a high status man, a powerful one, all get you that attention. They're all part of the same equation. If you don't understand this, you're the one bluepilled, not me.
Status is more important in so far as you can understand that the woman won't be with you out of feelings, but because you can provide for her. That's why most billionaire relationships end in trainwrecks with the roastie running away with the entire fortune of the beta who provided for her for years.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Yliaster
LMAO what, you think that a random non-famous good looking man can sleep with more women than a rich man. Heck there's even guys like k-Pop gay shit BTS members that should be invisible who have legions of female admirers all around the world. They have the ability to sleep with more women than an average Chad can. Money and Status >>> Looks
The rich man will have sex by buying the women Louis Vuitton bags while the Chad will have the woman genuinely attracted to him.

Cope, BTS members are gl, thats why they are popular. If they looked ugly their band would flop.
bro women do not give a fck about good looking or rich guys.They only care first and foremost about themselves.The rich guy and the good looking guy to women are basically just a means to and end to afford them certian priviliges that wouldn't otherwise have.

For example: Women want a good looking guy so that they can show him off to the world and to their friends on social media to display their high SMV and in the process making other girls jealous,which is like food to women.

The rich guy (Status) imo is even more valuable to women than the good looking guy,because he can afford anything their narcissistic whims are inclined to experience.He can take them on vacations,buy them all the expensive fashion they like etc etc etc.

Women are tyrants who use their smelly coochie to leverage power from men.They do not give a fck about Chad,Tyrone or men general.Men to women are just means to end.Whereas with men,most of them would kill their mothers just for a chance to sniff Stacy's coochie.Nature is cruel.
Cope, women love Chads, like men love Stacies. When the Chad breaks up with her, he will forever live rent-free in her head. When the incel betabuxxer breaks up with her she will forget about him in 2 days.
 

Similar threads

NT Master
Replies
0
Views
37
NT Master
NT Master
Jason Voorhees
Replies
17
Views
135
dhusc
dhusc
I
Replies
18
Views
175
iana
I
luuk
Replies
12
Views
359
ceasar3x
ceasar3x
SharpOrange
Replies
39
Views
708
chud_boy
chud_boy

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top