The idea of evenly distributing women so that every man gets to reproduce is simply inflicting pain on the next generation for the sake of your own...

6ft4

6ft4

Juggernaut Genes Possessor
Joined
Jul 12, 2019
Posts
9,557
Reputation
23,738
..pleasure.

I don't see how this is any different to Boomers destroying society so that they got max rewards from it but left a mess for their offspring and dont even care about their offspring's suffering so long as they continue to live comfortably

Lets imagine that your spirit/essence/awareness is going to come into existence through your mother and it will be the same regardless of what man she chooses to be your father, the only difference will be the physical genes you receive from your father..
In such a situation you wouldn't prefer for your average looking mother to have had her average looking looksmatch assigned to her to produce you with, you would've much preferred for her to have been impregnated by Chad so you received Chads genetics.

This is why reproduction SHOULD operate on a winner takes all basis, so that the next generation of souls can benefit from having better genes hence less physical defects that ruin their ability to enjoy life.

If you were made aware that it's a guarantee that you will reincarnate into the new generation immediately upon dying, would you prefer if every foid was being impregnated by their looksmatch or would you prefer if every foid was being impregnated by Chad?
You could argue that if they were all being impregnated by Chad then competition would just adapt accordingly and we'd be back at square one

But as more physical defects are removed form the population (thanks to Chads mass impregnating scheme, recession no longer exists) then the need for foids to seek the most attractive male becomes less and less as all males start to converge towards a single point and every male is seen as goodlooking and passing the looks threshold whereby a fractionally better looking male doesn't entice any hypergamic instinct, at which point foids can actually be evenly distributed because every guy has good genes
(It may have been like this in hunter gatherer times)
 
The problem with this line of logic is that there is no way sub 5 men not reproducing while sub 5 women get impregnated by good looking men is more eugenic than both sub 5 men or sub 5 women not reproducing. This just shows your gynocentricism no offense.
 

Similar threads

PrimalPlasty
Replies
33
Views
687
mercccwmouth
mercccwmouth
nuttheb
Replies
35
Views
1K
MoggsWithBoness
MoggsWithBoness
Aladin
Replies
23
Views
1K
averagenormie
A

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top