šŸ•¤ The IDEAL TIME to Create Threads | Looksmax.org Historical Data Exploration

thecel

thecel

narrow-orbits brachy-skull ogre
Joined
May 16, 2020
Posts
23,458
Reputation
48,975
Background Info About The Project
Looksmax.org currently has over 725,000 thread IDs. Every thread ID corresponds to a thread thatā€™s posted, which exists now or got deleted.

I scraped data from 10,500 randomly sampled forum threads from the 1st up to the 700,000th thread.

The samples are split into 14 bins. Each bin contains 750 samples that represent a 50,000-thread-long segment of the forumā€˜s history.



Question: Whatā€™s the best time to post threads here? Is it better to post when more users are active, despite higher competition? Or is it better to post when fewer threads are being created, to have less competition?

The scraped data shows that thread creation peaks around 4:00 AM UTC.

This is 12:00 AM midnight in US Eastern Time, for the burgercels.

Heatmap thread post UTC times


Question is: at what time do threads receive more replies?
  • Should you post your threads near (the peak) 4:00 AM UTC to get more activity in your threads, even if it means your thread competes with more other new threads?
  • Should you post your threads near (the valley) 16:00 / 4:00 PM UTC (12:00 PM noon EST) to face less competition from other threads, even if it means forum activity is lower?


Answer: To maximize the number of replies, post new threads at approx. 5:00 AM UTC, close to the peak time of thread creation.

This chart shows the total number of replies in all the scraped threads started in each hour:

Heatmap thread replies count by start UTC times


The threads thatā€™re posted during peak activity hours receive the most replies.

You can see in this chart that the overall number of replies appears to gradually diminish over the years. Why? Keep reading.



The NoReplyPill Is Climbing

Older threads are more likely to have more replies. Age itself contributes this trend but only by a little bit because almost all threads go inactive after a few days max.

The trend isnā€™t due to old threads accumulating necroposts. More recently started threads get fewer replies in the 1st 24 hours after their postings:

Box thread 24h activity


From the (earliest) 1st 50K-threads bin to the (latest) 14th 50K-threads bin, the median number of replies per thread fell 50% from 12 to 6, and the mean fell 35.62% from 17.21 to 11.08.

It gets worse. See this brutal chart about threads that sadly get no replies:

Stacks noreply threads


The NoReplyPill grew tremendously in prevalence.

In the 1st 50K threads, only 3.01% of threads suffered from some form of NoReplyPill: either they got 0 replies or got OP-bumped before non-OP(s) replied. In the 14th 50K threads, 23.226% of threads suffered from some form of NoReplyPill. A 671.6% increase! Of the 23.225%, 11.111% of them got bumped by their OPs and still never got off the ground.

Itā€™s over for the forum.



Previous Thread In The Series ā€œLooksmax.org Historical Data Explorationā€
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: Mouthbreath, Nick.Harte, Lookologist003 and 15 others
i post many threads in the dead hours ppl should search and read em
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: BrahminBoss and thecel
  • JFL
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 22918, rooman, BrahminBoss and 1 other person
Ur the goat but also get a life brother omg šŸ˜‚šŸ˜­
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Lookologist003, Myth, Deleted member 14392 and 4 others
Background Info About The Project
Looksmax.org currently has over 725,000 thread IDs. Every thread ID corresponds to a thread thatā€™s posted, which exists now or got deleted.

I scraped data from 10,500 randomly sampled forum threads from the 1st up to the 700,000th thread.

The samples are split into 14 bins. Each bin contains 750 samples that represent a 50,000-thread-long segment of the forumā€˜s history.



Question: Whatā€™s the best time to post threads here? Is it better to post when more users are active, despite higher competition? Or is it better to post when fewer threads are being created, to have less competition?

The scraped data shows that thread creation peaks around 4:00 AM UTC.

This is 12:00 AM midnight in US Eastern Time, for the burgercels.

View attachment 2212219

Question is: at what time do threads receive more replies?
  • Should you post your threads near (the peak) 4:00 AM UTC to get more activity in your threads, even if it means your thread competes with more other new threads?
  • Should you post your threads near (the valley) 16:00 / 4:00 PM UTC (12:00 PM noon EST) to face less competition from other threads, even if it means forum activity is lower?


Answer: To maximize the number of replies, post new threads at approx. 5:00 AM UTC, close to the peak time of thread creation.

This chart shows the total number of replies in all the scraped threads started in each hour:

View attachment 2212222

The threads thatā€™re posted during peak activity hours receive the most replies.

You can see in this chart that the overall number of replies appears to gradually diminish over the years. Why? Keep reading.



The NoReplyPill Is Climbing

Older threads are more likely to have more replies. Age itself contributes this trend but only by a little bit because almost all threads go inactive after a few days max.

The trend isnā€™t due to old threads accumulating necroposts. More recently started threads get fewer replies in the 1st 24 hours after their postings:

View attachment 2212243

From the (earliest) 1st 50K-threads bin to the (latest) 14th 50K-threads bin, the median number of replies per thread fell 50% from 12 to 6, and the mean fell 35.62% from 17.21 to 11.08.

It gets worse. See this brutal chart about threads that sadly get no replies:

View attachment 2212258

The NoReplyPill grew tremendously in prevalence.

In the 1st 50K threads, only 3.01% of threads suffered from some form of NoReplyPill: either they got 0 replies or got OP-bumped before non-OP(s) replied. In the 14th 50K threads, 23.226% of threads suffered from some form of NoReplyPill. A 671.6% increase! Of the 23.225%, 11.111% of them got bumped by their OPs and still never got off the ground.

Itā€™s over for the forum.



Previous Thread In The Series ā€œLooksmax.org Historical Data Explorationā€

Brutal.
 
  • +1
Reactions: rooman, Deleted member 25938, thecel and 1 other person
Brutal findings as I don't want to rot past 11 pm where I'm at making threads. However, this does explain why I tend to get many alerts the next morning.
 
  • +1
  • Love it
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 29710, tombradylover, BrahminBoss and 1 other person
Which app do you use for sorting data and why did you split it into bins? Easier processing?
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
Which app do you use for sorting data

Python



why did you split it into bins? Easier processing?

Without bins, this graph would have 1 bar instead of 14 bars:

Stacks prefixes


The barsā€™ widths correspond to the amount of time it took for each bin to be filled. As you can see the 1st 50,000 threads in the forum were posted over a much longer period compared to the 2nd 50,000 threads. Obv cus the forum was new.
 
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: horizontallytall and BrahminBoss
dicc threads are the best
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Skywalker
How are u sohigh iq. Ehat do u do?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: thecel
How are u sohigh iq. Ehat do u do?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Skywalker and thecel
  • +1
  • Love it
  • JFL
Reactions: tombradylover, thecel, Lookologist003 and 1 other person
You need help nigger
 
  • Hmm...
  • JFL
Reactions: Skywalker and thecel

Similar threads

gr34ter
Replies
9
Views
345
Hottaco34
Hottaco34
JustBeConfidentBruh
Replies
9
Views
241
Chadington
Chadington
proibitio
Replies
41
Views
380
Mr_Bombo_mogs
Mr_Bombo_mogs
LegitUser
Replies
55
Views
4K
perpetuallytired
perpetuallytired

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top