Serious The importance of angles. Stop rating people just based of selfies

Deleted member 8354

Deleted member 8354

Humble And Based
Joined
Jul 11, 2020
Posts
113
Reputation
230
I see so many people getting rated here just by selfies, It's very frustrating. Most people can manage to look good in a selfie.
Sex appeal/attractivness in general is ALL ABOUT how you look in real life not how you look in selfies. And the closest thing to represent how you look to others is How you look in motion, with camera meters way with from an eyesight angle. I have seen so many good looking people that are chads in real life/motion but on selfies they look bad due to not being knowledgeable about the right camera angle and correct lightning.

I'm going to be the guinea pig and just show you an example of myself. Trying to look bad in a selfie vs trying to look good and also an example in motion from further away.

Lets begin with the bad selfies. As you can see i look really bad here, probably average at best. Due to bad angle, skin and poor lightning condition. As you can see i have extremely dull skin left over from accutane which hopefully will go away in a few weeks when the youthful glow and skin hydration comes back.


And this is compared to selfies where i try to look as good as possible in good lightning. Big difference right? As you can see there is a huge difference with being knowledgeable of the right angles and lightning. I would get rated much lower with the bad pictures if i were completely clueless, And much higher rated with the pictures where i try to look good at.


so whats more accurate? The non frauding selfies or frauded selfies? To summon it up again its How you look in motion from meters away without any lens distortion- that gets you the closest to your realistic rating because it gives you a complete view of your face which shows your bad sides and good sides in go with makes it harder to fraud it.

example
 
Last edited:
bobt

bobt

Mage
Joined
Sep 14, 2021
Posts
700
Reputation
773
Time online
14d 1h 50m
Vampiremaxxer said:
I see so many people getting rated here just by selfies, It's very frustrating. Most people can manage to look good in a selfie.
Sex appeal/attractivness in general is ALL ABOUT how you look in real life not how you look in selfies. And the closest thing to represent how you look to others is How you look in motion, with camera meters way with from an eyesight angle. I have seen so many good looking people that are chads in real life/motion but they look bad in selfies due to not being knowledgeable about camera angle and correct lightning.

I'm going to be the guinea pig and just show you an example of myself. Trying to look bad in a picture vs trying to look decent and also an example in motion from further away.

Lets begin with the bad selfies. As you can see i look really bad here, probably average at best. Due to bad angle, skin and poor lightning condition. As you can see i have extremely dull skin left over from accutane which hopefully will go away in a few weeks when the youthful glow and skin hydration comes back.


And this is compared to selfies where i try to look as good as possible in good lightning. Big difference right? As you can see there is a huge difference with being knowledgeable of the right angles and lightning. I would get rated much lower with the bad pictures if i were completely clueless, And much higher rated with the pictures where i try to look good at.


so whats more accurate? The non frauding selfies or frauded selfies? To summon it up again its How you look in motion from meters away without any lens distortion- that gets you the closest to your realistic rating because it gives you a complete view of your face which shows your bad sides and good sides in go with makes it harder to fraud it.

example
GOOD ONE OP VERy well thought out you look like a white version of me
 
Last edited:
pianoboy123

pianoboy123

Detective HTN/chadpreetlite in looksmax city
Joined
Jun 3, 2021
Posts
3,267
Reputation
3,050
Time online
37d 13h 56m
Vampiremaxxer said:
I see so many people getting rated here just by selfies, It's very frustrating. Most people can manage to look good in a selfie.
Sex appeal/attractivness in general is ALL ABOUT how you look in real life not how you look in selfies. And the closest thing to represent how you look to others is How you look in motion, with camera meters way with from an eyesight angle. I have seen so many good looking people that are chads in real life/motion but they look bad in selfies due to not being knowledgeable about camera angle and correct lightning.

I'm going to be the guinea pig and just show you an example of myself. Trying to look bad in a picture vs trying to look decent and also an example in motion from further away.

Lets begin with the bad selfies. As you can see i look really bad here, probably average at best. Due to bad angle, skin and poor lightning condition. As you can see i have extremely dull skin left over from accutane which hopefully will go away in a few weeks when the youthful glow and skin hydration comes back.


And this is compared to selfies where i try to look as good as possible in good lightning. Big difference right? As you can see there is a huge difference with being knowledgeable of the right angles and lightning. I would get rated much lower with the bad pictures if i were completely clueless, And much higher rated with the pictures where i try to look good at.


so whats more accurate? The non frauding selfies or frauded selfies? To summon it up again its How you look in motion from meters away without any lens distortion- that gets you the closest to your realistic rating because it gives you a complete view of your face which shows your bad sides and good sides in go with makes it harder to fraud it.

example
 
Deleted member 3593

Deleted member 3593

Zephir
Joined
Oct 20, 2019
Posts
2,169
Reputation
2,563
Time online
57d 6h 25m
meh a straight on picture with proper lighting is accurate. I’ve seen a lot of IG and tinder foids irl on campus and they all literally look like how I saw them on pictures give or take a couple. It’s very difficult to look good frontal if u have a shit tier side and 3/4ths. You can literally tell if someone is gl from behind lol.

At the end of the day your brain decides on physical attractiveness in 100ths of a second, this is over complicating things.
 
hail

hail

Zzz
Joined
Sep 30, 2021
Posts
20
Reputation
33
Time online
1d 17h 36m
Good post, but also imo rating off of selfies should be front, 3/4th, and side profile for this reason.
 
WontStopNorwooding

WontStopNorwooding

Iconic and funny user
Joined
Aug 9, 2021
Posts
11,628
Reputation
35,909
Time online
77d 10h 55m
OldVirgin said:
WontStopNorwooding @WontStopNorwooding why jfl react? its true
Cuz its true :soy:
 
chinpilled

chinpilled

Enthusiast
Joined
Jul 7, 2021
Posts
434
Reputation
674
Time online
7d 3h 27m
Vampiremaxxer said:
I see so many people getting rated here just by selfies, It's very frustrating. Most people can manage to look good in a selfie.
Sex appeal/attractivness in general is ALL ABOUT how you look in real life not how you look in selfies. And the closest thing to represent how you look to others is How you look in motion, with camera meters way with from an eyesight angle. I have seen so many good looking people that are chads in real life/motion but on selfies they look bad due to not being knowledgeable about the right camera angle and correct lightning.

I'm going to be the guinea pig and just show you an example of myself. Trying to look bad in a selfie vs trying to look good and also an example in motion from further away.

Lets begin with the bad selfies. As you can see i look really bad here, probably average at best. Due to bad angle, skin and poor lightning condition. As you can see i have extremely dull skin left over from accutane which hopefully will go away in a few weeks when the youthful glow and skin hydration comes back.


And this is compared to selfies where i try to look as good as possible in good lightning. Big difference right? As you can see there is a huge difference with being knowledgeable of the right angles and lightning. I would get rated much lower with the bad pictures if i were completely clueless, And much higher rated with the pictures where i try to look good at.


so whats more accurate? The non frauding selfies or frauded selfies? To summon it up again its How you look in motion from meters away without any lens distortion- that gets you the closest to your realistic rating because it gives you a complete view of your face which shows your bad sides and good sides in go with makes it harder to fraud it.

example
There is no image in the example
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top