T
truthprovider1
Silver
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2025
- Posts
- 537
- Reputation
- 588
note: today I was in the mood for shitposting in looks questions but I saw a thread talking about JBF and thought I have to give my 3 cents
For those of you who do not know what JBF means, it means "Just be first".
It is usually used in two contexts:
a> Just be first as in looks don't matter as much when you are the first to approach a woman/her first partner
b> Just be first as in otherwise the relationship can't be "true" otherwise
\
However calling both of these scenarios true or false is simply idiotic.
a)
False: A is pretty self explanatory. In the past, back when women were considered whores after having more than 1 partner you would still have
women cheat on their first partner even doe he was "ok" regarding to how men were seen in that time (especially if he was a rich dude who "bought
her". Nowadays you also have women/men who cheat on their first partners and so the just part becomes false, therefore it is false.
True: While JBF becomes false if we limit it using the word just (as in its a MUST that cannot be false)
if we don't limit it and just say it JBFing "helps you a bunch" the theory becomes true. Humans have a
higher chance to be attached to a first human or first thing.
b)
False/True: We prove this can be false or true in the same way. Lets say a woman has 10 partners up until she was 27. Lets say
each was a relationship that lasted 4+ months, and involved sexual intercourse.
What a lot of people forget here is that women have a higher need for a partner
Those 10 dudes could have been "throwaways". I have known and know many women who would
leave their boyfriend in a instant if a better guy was to appear in their life.
Now what if he does. A dude who is over 5'11 and a half (enough taller than 99% of women that you will see in your
daily life) HMTN or above (close to HTN because of very good self care and hygiene), has a job (doesn't need to provide
just have a stable job, also this sometimes can even not be true, look in the instagram comments of any unemployed HTN with
decent social status), and also has good enough emotional intelligence , social intelligence and iq, is good at sex and also
has a cool hobby like music art etc.
He is her first good partner, the first partner that she actually has many reasons to NOT CHEAT on and to KEEP "women even made the term keeper for this"
Could we consider this JBF(since he is the FIRST good guy in her life)
> If we do, than JBF is still true because the others were just "entertainment" and "placeholders"
> If we don't and limit JBF to the first partner JBF becomes false.
Thanks for coming to my ted talk.
For those of you who do not know what JBF means, it means "Just be first".
It is usually used in two contexts:
a> Just be first as in looks don't matter as much when you are the first to approach a woman/her first partner
b> Just be first as in otherwise the relationship can't be "true" otherwise
\
However calling both of these scenarios true or false is simply idiotic.
a)
False: A is pretty self explanatory. In the past, back when women were considered whores after having more than 1 partner you would still have
women cheat on their first partner even doe he was "ok" regarding to how men were seen in that time (especially if he was a rich dude who "bought
her". Nowadays you also have women/men who cheat on their first partners and so the just part becomes false, therefore it is false.
True: While JBF becomes false if we limit it using the word just (as in its a MUST that cannot be false)
if we don't limit it and just say it JBFing "helps you a bunch" the theory becomes true. Humans have a
higher chance to be attached to a first human or first thing.
b)
False/True: We prove this can be false or true in the same way. Lets say a woman has 10 partners up until she was 27. Lets say
each was a relationship that lasted 4+ months, and involved sexual intercourse.
What a lot of people forget here is that women have a higher need for a partner
Those 10 dudes could have been "throwaways". I have known and know many women who would
leave their boyfriend in a instant if a better guy was to appear in their life.
Now what if he does. A dude who is over 5'11 and a half (enough taller than 99% of women that you will see in your
daily life) HMTN or above (close to HTN because of very good self care and hygiene), has a job (doesn't need to provide
just have a stable job, also this sometimes can even not be true, look in the instagram comments of any unemployed HTN with
decent social status), and also has good enough emotional intelligence , social intelligence and iq, is good at sex and also
has a cool hobby like music art etc.
He is her first good partner, the first partner that she actually has many reasons to NOT CHEAT on and to KEEP "women even made the term keeper for this"
Could we consider this JBF(since he is the FIRST good guy in her life)
> If we do, than JBF is still true because the others were just "entertainment" and "placeholders"
> If we don't and limit JBF to the first partner JBF becomes false.
Thanks for coming to my ted talk.
