The LL paradox

[attarde75]

A good LL costs around 80k€, if a person can afford to put 80k in something that is useless (apart from appearance obviously), then this guy is financially relatively wealthy.
Does a wealthy person need +10cm for fuck?

 

[Deleted member 17920]

Software engineers from big tech firms like Google, Amazon, Microsoft, and Meta are paying at least $75,000 to get 3 inches taller, a leg-lengthening surgeon says

The surgeon breaks the patients' thigh bones and inserts nails that are extended with a magnetic remote control every day for three months, GQ said.

www.businessinsider.com

Over for these indians

 

[ChadpreetMaxxer]

A good LL costs around 80k€, if a person can afford to put 80k in something that is useless (apart from appearance obviously), then this guy is financially relatively wealthy.
Does a wealthy person need +10cm for fuck?

because women in first world care about your SMV more than your wealth. so the best thing to do is spend wealth on smv.

logic

how did u not work this out yet.

oh ur a 2022cel

 

[attarde75]

because women in first world care about your SMV more than your wealth. so the best thing to do is spend wealth on smv.

logic

how did u not work this out yet.

oh ur a 2022cel

a woman would rather be with a 5'1 2/10 millionaire than a 6'3 8/10 ice cream man, if you think otherwise, I feel sorry for you.

 

[DoctorLooksmax]

a woman would rather be with a 5'1 2/10 millionaire than a 6'3 8/10 ice cream man, if you think otherwise, I feel sorry for you.

They really wouldn’t jfl

Also a millionaire is about as common than a 6’3 man anyway

In the UK being a millionaire (in £) puts you at about 95th percentile wealth

6’3 is 96.8th percentile height so it’s actually rarer srs


Being a millionaire is honeetly really not that special or impressive these days- and since such a tiny fraction of young women would prioritise wealth over face or height- if you wanna run betabux game on an attractive young foid while being very low smv in other respects being a millionaire is quite simply not enough

 

[Deleted member 17920]

They really wouldn’t jfl

Also a millionaire is about as common than a 6’3 man anyway

In the UK being a millionaire (in £) puts you at about 95th percentile wealth

6’3 is 96.8th percentile height so it’s actually rarer srs


Being a millionaire is honeetly really not that special or impressive these days- and since such a tiny fraction of young women would prioritise wealth over face or height- if you wanna run betabux game on an attractive young foid while being very low smv in other respects being a millionaire is quite simply not enough

+ i don’t get how anyone blackpilled could feel good betabuxxing a foid

 

[ChadpreetMaxxer]

a woman would rather be with a 5'1 2/10 millionaire than a 6'3 8/10 ice cream man, if you think otherwise, I feel sorry for you.

@DoctorLooksmax check out this new coper I found

I honestly love how adamantly bluepilled notmies are , just shows how far ahead we are

 

[DoctorLooksmax]

+ i don’t get how anyone blackpilled could feel good betabuxxing a foid

I agree but even just on a purely statistical level its more valuable to be 6'3 than a millioanire- even if both traits were equally important

 

[Rabbi]

I think you underestimate just how much height matters in the work place especially from man to man, other men rarely take manlets seriously