The Masc vs Prettyboy discussion

D

Deleted member 6873

.
Joined
May 9, 2020
Posts
14,697
Reputation
25,340
This thread is basically my take on the entire discussion.

In my honest opinion, for getting women prettyboy or masc don't matter.
What matters is if they are GL.

An ugly masc will still slay 100x less than a goodlooking prettyboy and vice versa.

However, there are pros and cons to both.

While prettyboys can easier get women in their prime.
It's not ideal if you care about getting respect from other men. You'll always be treated less i can speak from personal experience, a MASC man that is not gl will still get 10x the respect a gl prettyboy will.
On the aging question, it depends. Certain prettyboys age AMAZING, Jared Leto is a very good example of this. However he has good bones, if you're a prettyboy just because you have nice skin and hair you NEED to hold onto your collagen.

This is where MASC wins, they can have 0 collagen and still look good for their category. Cause masc men usually have the bones to fall back on.
However, their prime will be later in life since in general these types of men will be more attractive to the 23+ crew.

All in All i think everyone should strive to be maesthetic
A good mixture of both Masculine AND feminine features
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 8165, Britishlooksmaxxer, Mouthbreath and 2 others
where are all these banger threads coming from akhi
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Mouthbreath and Deleted member 6873
Over for ogres like me no pretty boy for you bones
IMG 9579
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 6572
Mix of both is ideal. David Laid has insane appeal and dominates Tinder
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6873
Mix of both is ideal. David Laid has insane appeal and dominates Tinder
100%
And i think maesthetic is more attainable to both sides of the spectrum.
A prettyboy can never become full on masc and vice versa.
 
  • +1
Reactions: HowAmIAlive123
just be a masc prettyboy theory
 
There was a study that showed women with worse living situation preferred masc over prettyboy and vice versa for women in developed countries. Similar pattern for elected leaders during times of conflict (masc) vs leaders during times of peace (high trust). Masculinity is a sign of safety and security during hard times whereas prettyboys are higher trust and less likely to cheat, preferable when you already are socially and economically secure
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6873
There was a study that showed women with worse living situation preferred masc over prettyboy and vice versa for women in developed countries. Similar pattern for elected leaders during times of conflict (masc) vs leaders during times of peace (high trust). Masculinity is a sign of safety and security during hard times whereas prettyboys are higher trust and less likely to cheat, preferable when you already are socially and economically secure
Very legit.
That's why prettyboys are way more popular in developed countries such as The Netherlands, Germany etc
 

Similar threads

J
Replies
145
Views
3K
Napoleon1800
Napoleon1800
Parminder Singh
Replies
43
Views
775
voqdtuglord
voqdtuglord
high_ltn
Replies
47
Views
1K
gigacumster3000
gigacumster3000
Aryan Incel
Replies
24
Views
594
ihatemySOST
ihatemySOST

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top