THE MODERATING TEAM SUPPORTS ISIS

[Deleted member 41390]

Thread 'IS-K kill and wound more than 20 Taliban members.'
https://looksmax.org/threads/is-k-kill-and-wound-more-than-20-taliban-members.1043871/

Here we see @Fiqh making a post in support of isis. You can click on the thread and clearly see he supports isis.

I was not happy with this for obvious reasons so I made the mods aware of the situation.

But no action was taken. In fact I was mocked by the moderator @coisbhai .

Now you may ask, ‘what rule has he broken? He’s just exercising his freedom of speech.
He has broken this rule:

.
In most EU countries including America supporting an extremely violent and disgusting terrorist group is illegal. Furthermore even if it wasn’t illegal to post isis propaganda, it could directly or indirectly incite some unhinged Muslim to commit a violent act.

Anyone with a brain that doesn’t support isis would agree that the user @Fiqh needs to be banned. But he seems to have either slipped under the radar of the mods or is being actively protected by them. Possibly because they agree with him. Who knows.


@Master @Alexanderr @Sny @NumbThePain @Gargantuan @Eternal_

 

[Deleted member 41390]

@Sny why isn’t he banned?

 

[vermillioncorefan]

i have no personal opinion on isis or taliban they’re both sand niggers blowing each other up in the sand kys sandnigger

 

[vermillioncorefan]

@Sny why isn’t he banned?

nah buzzkill isis members are cool

 

[Deleted member 41390]

i have no personal opinion on isis or taliban they’re both sand niggers blowing each other up in the sand kys sandnigger

Why are you telling me to kms bud? That’s not nice.

 

[Offensive Bias]

@Sny why isn’t he banned?

He doesn't seem to be fully endorsing ISIS. Also he hasn't specified action that may be implied as a call to action or arms. Simply agreeing with a terrorist group isn't enough to warrant a ban like that. We will monitor this conversation further to see if there are any issues.

 

[Deleted member 41390]

He doesn't seem to be fully endorsing ISIS. Also he hasn't specified action that may be implied as a call to action or arms. Simply agreeing with a terrorist group isn't enough to warrant a ban like that. We will monitor this conversation further to see if there are any issues.

This is wrong on many levels because even posting about this without making a disclaimer that you don’t agree with them is enabling other people to do the same. Thus inciting violence. This isnt helping your case.

 

[Deleted member 41390]

nah buzzkill isis members are cool

I don’t think we can be friends anymore.

 

[Deleted member 51576]

FACT CHECK: TRUE

 

[Daqirius]

Way to draw more attention to the forum you informant retard

 

[GabachoCopium]

Thread 'IS-K kill and wound more than 20 Taliban members.'
https://looksmax.org/threads/is-k-kill-and-wound-more-than-20-taliban-members.1043871/

Here we see @Fiqh making a post in support of isis. You can click on the thread and clearly see he supports isis.

I was not happy with this for obvious reasons so I made the mods aware of the situation.View attachment 2944197
But no action was taken. In fact I was mocked by the moderator @coisbhai .View attachment 2944203

Now you may ask, ‘what rule has he broken? He’s just exercising his freedom of speech.
He has broken this rule:View attachment 2944208.
In most EU countries including America supporting an extremely violent and disgusting terrorist group is illegal. Furthermore even if it wasn’t illegal to post isis propaganda, it could directly or indirectly incite some unhinged Muslim to commit a violent act.

Anyone with a brain that doesn’t support isis would agree that the user @Fiqh needs to be banned. But he seems to have either slipped under the radar of the mods or is being actively protected by them. Possibly because they agree with him. Who knows.


@Master @Alexanderr @Sny @NumbThePain @Gargantuan @Eternal_

well well well…

 

[Deleted member 41390]

Way to draw more attention to the forum you informant retard

Blame me instead of the moderating team for not dealing with it.

 

[Deleted member 51576]

Way to draw more attention to the forum you informant retard

Shut up bish nigga

 

[yeeyeeslayer]

He doesn't seem to be fully endorsing ISIS. Also he hasn't specified action that may be implied as a call to action or arms.

i've seen him do both of these things

 

[yeeyeeslayer]

This is wrong on many levels because even posting about this without making a disclaimer that you don’t agree with them is enabling other people to do the same. Thus inciting violence. This isnt helping your case.

he does,

he 100% endorses their terrorist attacks anyways

 

[sweetheart]

worse thing is, moderation team has many arabs who support hamas terrorists

 

[Deleted member 67869]

Boo hoo nigga

 

[Deleted member 41390]

i've seen him do both of these things

he does,

he 100% endorses their terrorist attacks anyways

Bump

 

[i_love_roosters]

That's not even the worst he's posted. Definitely deserves a ban. That other Maghreb nigger deserves one too. Remember how your thread on him magically dissapeared. Fuck them and the dawahgandist who sent them here. Also fuck the mods who protect them

 

[Deleted member 41390]

That's not even the worst he's posted. Definitely deserves a ban. That other Maghreb nigger deserves one too. Remember how your thread on him magically dissapeared. Fuck them and the dawahgandist who sent them here. Also fuck the mods who protect them

Make sure to report him @yeeyeeslayer

 

[i_love_roosters]

Make sure to report him @yeeyeeslayer

No one is gonna ban this faggot The mods are all muzzy incels and the "Christian" ones are absolute fucking cucks

 

[tombradylover]

isis mogs and is cool and fun boyo. Get with the program

 

[i_love_roosters]

View attachment 2944794View attachment 2944795

No one is gonna ban this faggot The mods are all muzzy incels and the "Christian" ones are absolute fucking cucks

@Master @Alexanderr diversify your mod squad, sons

 

[i_love_roosters]

He doesn't seem to be fully endorsing ISIS. Also he hasn't specified action that may be implied as a call to action or arms. Simply agreeing with a terrorist group isn't enough to warrant a ban like that. We will monitor this conversation further to see if there are any issues.

Post illegal content This nigga has posted isis executions so many times

Here's one instance

[ISIS] - Gay Man Thrown off Building in Front of Crowd For Inappropriately Touching a Kid

looksmax.org

 

[yeeyeeslayer]

View attachment 2944794View attachment 2944795

No one is gonna ban this faggot The mods are all muzzy incels and the "Christian" ones are absolute fucking cucks

@Master @Alexanderr

 

[Deleted member 41390]

Bump

@Master @Alexanderr

 

[yeeyeeslayer]

Bump

i really hope master/alexanderr at least address the points made here and the screenshots presented

 

[yeeyeeslayer]

also this content/users being allowed here increases the liklihood of this forum getting shut down

 

[Deleted member 41390]

i really hope master/alexanderr at least address the points made here and the screenshots presented

@Alexanderr is a good guy I think he’ll understand

 

[Alexanderr]

even posting about this without making a disclaimer that you don’t agree with them is enabling other people to do the same

Hmm, no.

Not explicitly putting a disclaimer does not enable support because, well, context matters.
Discussing a topic isn't endorsing it. Users have freedom of speech as long as they don't incite violence (i.e. calls to action).

If you have a thread/post of his that explicitly calls for violence feel free to report it (i.e. something more than "he's got an angle here" report you made earlier. No need to be vague, if it's an explicit threat.

Intent and adherence to guidelines are what matters, not the presence of a disclaimer.

This post of his would warrant a warning, for example.

 

[Alexanderr]

also this content/users being allowed here increases the liklihood of this forum getting shut down

People have said that for years, about incels.is too. We're not turning this forum into Reddit if I can help it.

 

[Deleted member 41390]

Hmm, no.

Not explicitly putting a disclaimer does not enable support because, well, context matters.
Discussing a topic isn't endorsing it. Users have freedom of speech as long as they don't incite violence (i.e. calls to action).

If you have a thread/post of his that explicitly calls for violence feel free to report it (i.e. something more than "he's got an angle here" report you made earlier. No need to be vague, if it's an explicit threat.

Intent and adherence to guidelines are what matters, not the presence of a disclaimer.

View attachment 2944963
This post of his would warrant a warning, for example.

People have said that for years, about incels.is too. We're not turning this forum into Reddit if I can help it.

*banning isis supporters* = turning this forum into Reddit

 

[yeeyeeslayer]

Hmm, no.

Not explicitly putting a disclaimer does not enable support because, well, context matters.
Discussing a topic isn't endorsing it. Users have freedom of speech as long as they don't incite violence (i.e. calls to action).

If you have a thread/post of his that explicitly calls for violence feel free to report it (i.e. something more than "he's got an angle here" report you made earlier. No need to be vague, if it's an explicit threat.

Intent and adherence to guidelines are what matters, not the presence of a disclaimer.

View attachment 2944963
This post of his would warrant a warning, for example.

BRUH

 

[Deleted member 41390]

Hmm, no.

Not explicitly putting a disclaimer does not enable support because, well, context matters.
Discussing a topic isn't endorsing it. Users have freedom of speech as long as they don't incite violence (i.e. calls to action).

If you have a thread/post of his that explicitly calls for violence feel free to report it (i.e. something more than "he's got an angle here" report you made earlier. No need to be vague, if it's an explicit threat.

Intent and adherence to guidelines are what matters, not the presence of a disclaimer.

View attachment 2944963
This post of his would warrant a warning, for example.

But showing support for isis is illegal which breaks a rule jfl.

 

[Alexanderr]

But showing support for isis is illegal which breaks a rule jfl.

From what I can see, his reply isn't as black-white as you make it out to be.
I'm not a lawyer, but I'm pretty certain he wouldn't go to prison for that thread.
So, I stand by what I said earlier, if you can find something more incriminating, then report it.

 

[Fiqh]

View attachment 2945032
From what I can see, his reply isn't as black-white as you make it out to be.
I'm not a lawyer, but I'm pretty certain he wouldn't go to prison for that thread.
So, I stand by what I said earlier, if you can find something more incriminating, then report it.

If it isn't obvious enough, I don't support the group itself - I, and many others, are just happy when Bashar's or some Iraqi militia member dies.

 

[Deleted member 51576]

Dont ban fiqh u kuffars

You are a Pakistani Muslimcel. You had to learn what the word kuffar meant because it’s in a foreign language. It’s the same foreign language that you call your god.

Shameful, beta

 

[Deleted member 51576]

I legit didnt reply to your thread because of how dumb it was, i thought to myself incels in this forum will stay ignorant even tho i pointed out all of the things you said so why do i bother replying i expect better arguments you pointed out the worst like a true nationalist would

الله يهديكم و يهدينا جميعا

You didn’t reply because I sent you to school and educated your little dumbass. I’m also not an incel or nationalist.

Don’t copy and paste Arabic, beta. You speak and write Urdu, not Arabic. Your overlords speak Arabic

 

[Deleted member 41390]

You didn’t reply because I sent you to school and educated your little dumbass. I’m also not an incel or nationalist.

Don’t copy and paste Arabic, beta. You speak and write Urdu, not Arabic. Your overlords speak Arabic

You’re Turkish

 

[TheDarkEnigma]

Thread 'IS-K kill and wound more than 20 Taliban members.'
https://looksmax.org/threads/is-k-kill-and-wound-more-than-20-taliban-members.1043871/

Here we see @Fiqh making a post in support of isis. You can click on the thread and clearly see he supports isis.

I was not happy with this for obvious reasons so I made the mods aware of the situation.View attachment 2944197
But no action was taken. In fact I was mocked by the moderator @coisbhai .View attachment 2944203

Now you may ask, ‘what rule has he broken? He’s just exercising his freedom of speech.
He has broken this rule:View attachment 2944208.
In most EU countries including America supporting an extremely violent and disgusting terrorist group is illegal. Furthermore even if it wasn’t illegal to post isis propaganda, it could directly or indirectly incite some unhinged Muslim to commit a violent act.

Anyone with a brain that doesn’t support isis would agree that the user @Fiqh needs to be banned. But he seems to have either slipped under the radar of the mods or is being actively protected by them. Possibly because they agree with him. Who knows.


@Master @Alexanderr @Sny @NumbThePain @Gargantuan @Eternal_

Aren't you Arab? I thought your kind think of ISIS as being based because at least they put foids in their place and stone the gays.