TalesFromTheSlums
Too high IQ to post here or waste any time anymore
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2025
- Posts
- 1,426
- Reputation
- 3,387
In general the more Capitalist a place the more likely there will be incels there.
Capitalists urge for the carrot & stick game. The wageslave roundabout. The desire to upkeep and always have something to provide. The endless grind and flexibility. The need for keeping up with the Joneses and riding those tides nonstop.
Because of this Capitalism is a major incel breeder as incels are empty eaters more.
Incels avoid the carrot and stick game. They don't chase the ungettable forever and use the resources in doing such to advertise themselves as valued players in a game.
So for this reason Capitalism is an incelmaker. A divider. A have and have not driver. It really shows women how variable men can be -- rich and poor -- often within miles of one another in most major cities.
Because of this these same areas breed incels because it becomes all too obvious which men are "playing the game" at a higher level and which are ... Not playing at all.
In a communist place there is no real "variation" in typical male status.
So women would have no choice but to disregard status in these areas.
After all, between normal civilians in, say, Cuba, which men have high status & which low?
That is why there is hardly a thing as an incel in places like
/Cuba.
I dare you to show me one incel Cuban (in Cuba, not Cuban American).
It is FAR FAR LESS LIKELY to find an incel in a Communist market.
So with that knowledge we can further understand how inceldom comes to be -- POLITICALLY.
In Communist lands there is no false hope of "chasing a carrot" bullshit.
Women there can't expect any normal dude to be "grinding for millions."
They can't value their potential boyfriends so based on his actions in a market-focused interpretation of male value.
There is no major divider in male value in Communist markets.
But capitalism HEAVILY promotes male value fluctuations, bottom and top.
They also value greed, consumerism and certain lifestyles that some men do not have nor want to provide.
So capitalism makes women entitled.
It makes men more likely to be loser incels.
Communist on the other hand values community more than growth ideals.
So inceldom is rare. Capitalism = endless incels. Why do you think most are Western?
Why do you think most are white?
These men are the ones dropping out of the Capitalist game that works against them.
They see the game and system for it is, so they don't play it -- & thus become sexless fodder.
Women in Capitalist countries know THE HAVES and HAVE NOTs.
So they can easily decide which guys they want to fuck if looks are not 100% in favor.
Because these are all men playing the carrot game.
And incels just simply will not as it is not in every man's nature to be a Capitalist.
Every man won't be the kind of man that women expect in hypercapitalist markets.
So with these sociopolitical factors made aware we can easily see that NOT ONLY LOOKS play a role in inceldom overall.
With the caveat of course that it depends on just how many "competitors."
Capitalists urge for the carrot & stick game. The wageslave roundabout. The desire to upkeep and always have something to provide. The endless grind and flexibility. The need for keeping up with the Joneses and riding those tides nonstop.
Because of this Capitalism is a major incel breeder as incels are empty eaters more.
Incels avoid the carrot and stick game. They don't chase the ungettable forever and use the resources in doing such to advertise themselves as valued players in a game.
So for this reason Capitalism is an incelmaker. A divider. A have and have not driver. It really shows women how variable men can be -- rich and poor -- often within miles of one another in most major cities.
Because of this these same areas breed incels because it becomes all too obvious which men are "playing the game" at a higher level and which are ... Not playing at all.
In a communist place there is no real "variation" in typical male status.
So women would have no choice but to disregard status in these areas.
After all, between normal civilians in, say, Cuba, which men have high status & which low?
That is why there is hardly a thing as an incel in places like
/Cuba.I dare you to show me one incel Cuban (in Cuba, not Cuban American).
It is FAR FAR LESS LIKELY to find an incel in a Communist market.
So with that knowledge we can further understand how inceldom comes to be -- POLITICALLY.
In Communist lands there is no false hope of "chasing a carrot" bullshit.
Women there can't expect any normal dude to be "grinding for millions."
They can't value their potential boyfriends so based on his actions in a market-focused interpretation of male value.
There is no major divider in male value in Communist markets.
But capitalism HEAVILY promotes male value fluctuations, bottom and top.
They also value greed, consumerism and certain lifestyles that some men do not have nor want to provide.
So capitalism makes women entitled.
It makes men more likely to be loser incels.
Communist on the other hand values community more than growth ideals.
So inceldom is rare. Capitalism = endless incels. Why do you think most are Western?
Why do you think most are white?
These men are the ones dropping out of the Capitalist game that works against them.
They see the game and system for it is, so they don't play it -- & thus become sexless fodder.
Women in Capitalist countries know THE HAVES and HAVE NOTs.
So they can easily decide which guys they want to fuck if looks are not 100% in favor.
Because these are all men playing the carrot game.
And incels just simply will not as it is not in every man's nature to be a Capitalist.
Every man won't be the kind of man that women expect in hypercapitalist markets.
So with these sociopolitical factors made aware we can easily see that NOT ONLY LOOKS play a role in inceldom overall.
With the caveat of course that it depends on just how many "competitors."
Last edited:
