D
Deleted member 20704
Doesn't vibe with humans much anymore.
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2022
- Posts
- 1,484
- Reputation
- 2,428
In a grand liberal area like San Francisco or Cuckifornia you can hear of incel-tier guys having sex sometimes or girlfriends.
However, go to a more conservative, anti-liberal area and find that only masc, DOM-personality or Chad-esque resembling guys have shots.
It's because liberal = birth control = manipulated sexual marketplace. Subhumans may score, but too masc. guys may be ousted sometimes.
Opposite for conservative -- more rugged men liked because no/less birth control, so women/girls have ovulatory shift, culture different, etc.
This is of course if both areas have similar economics/lifestyle/etc. It's different if rich liberal & poor conservative, but still my point stands.
Subhuman, boneless and fem incels do better in libtard, pro-left areas (like oofies & beta) while more masc. looking guys/Chadlier do better with either conservative areas, older women (not on birth control), or with some degree of jbs who are also not on the pill too depending on economics/proximity theory. So Chads do good anywhere obviously compared to average subhumans, but besides that the "locationpill" is just an amalgamation of the idea of economics, politics, health and general outlook/physiologies present in said marketplaces + genes.
However, go to a more conservative, anti-liberal area and find that only masc, DOM-personality or Chad-esque resembling guys have shots.
It's because liberal = birth control = manipulated sexual marketplace. Subhumans may score, but too masc. guys may be ousted sometimes.
Opposite for conservative -- more rugged men liked because no/less birth control, so women/girls have ovulatory shift, culture different, etc.
This is of course if both areas have similar economics/lifestyle/etc. It's different if rich liberal & poor conservative, but still my point stands.
Subhuman, boneless and fem incels do better in libtard, pro-left areas (like oofies & beta) while more masc. looking guys/Chadlier do better with either conservative areas, older women (not on birth control), or with some degree of jbs who are also not on the pill too depending on economics/proximity theory. So Chads do good anywhere obviously compared to average subhumans, but besides that the "locationpill" is just an amalgamation of the idea of economics, politics, health and general outlook/physiologies present in said marketplaces + genes.
