The newest and most accurate theory of face rating!

Akademik_Komarov

Akademik_Komarov

Silver
Joined
Feb 16, 2024
Posts
579
Reputation
272
The theory is based on the forward projection of the face.

It claims that based on the forward projection of the face, one can accurately predict the attractiveness of both the side and front profiles.

The forward projection of the face is determined by the profile silhouette.

The image shows comparisons of silhouettes and their hierarchy of attractiveness, translated into the classic looksmax system.

1763802868781
 
  • Hmm...
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Klasik616, TiktokUser, Meteor21 and 2 others
People with severe orthodontic curvatures are incels
 
The theory is based on the forward projection of the face.

It claims that based on the forward projection of the face, one can accurately predict the attractiveness of both the side and front profiles.

The forward projection of the face is determined by the profile silhouette.

The image shows comparisons of silhouettes and their hierarchy of attractiveness, translated into the classic looksmax system.

View attachment 4351013
Does this new way of rating make you cl?
 
This theory does not replace the old theories of beauty, but helps solve the same problem without resorting to inaccurate measurements.
The new theory demonstrates the same accuracy as the old ones, and in some cases, even more accurate.
 
Side profile doesnt matter enough to me, but I guess I do
This theory distinguishes between the harmony of the side profile and the forward growth of the face.
Facial growth determines the harmony of BOTH the side and front profiles.
 
  • +1
Reactions: JohnDon
With this type of analysis, the position of the head in the photo is irrelevant, and playing with the angles won't mislead. Lens distortion doesn't affect this type of analysis at all.
 
The theory is based on the forward projection of the face.

It claims that based on the forward projection of the face, one can accurately predict the attractiveness of both the side and front profiles.

The forward projection of the face is determined by the profile silhouette.

The image shows comparisons of silhouettes and their hierarchy of attractiveness, translated into the classic looksmax system.

View attachment 4351013
did u make this yourself? :lul:
 
nigga side carries just 20% of what generally see rest if your front many GL ppl have shit side profile and vice versa
 
  • +1
Reactions: SomaliaSub5
nigga side carries just 20% of what generally see rest if your front many GL ppl have shit side profile and vice versa
forward facial growth DETERMINES the front and side profile
 
look at adriana lima, paul walker, robert pattinson, etcthey are recessed/flat yet still good looking because of their front. plenty of people with great side profiles with chopped fronts on the other hand
 
look at adriana lima, paul walker, robert pattinson, etcthey are recessed/flat yet still good looking because of their front. plenty of people with great side profiles with chopped fronts on the other hand
Robert Pattinson has a forward facial growth at Chad's level. Adriana Lima and Paul Walker are both at C(S)L level
 

Attachments

  • 1763809960018.png
    1763809960018.png
    50.2 KB · Views: 0
look at adriana lima, paul walker, robert pattinson, etcthey are recessed/flat yet still good looking because of their front. plenty of people with great side profiles with chopped fronts on the other hand
Robert Pattinson's forward facial growth appears weak because he has a large, overhanging forehead. I've created a silhouette where I've removed the forehead protrusion to make it more visible.
1763810817302
 
Last edited:
The theory is based on the forward projection of the face.

It claims that based on the forward projection of the face, one can accurately predict the attractiveness of both the side and front profiles.

The forward projection of the face is determined by the profile silhouette.

The image shows comparisons of silhouettes and their hierarchy of attractiveness, translated into the classic looksmax system.

View attachment 4351013
the image sketch of the craniums is so dogshit. Why didn’t you actually try to find different skeletal cranium references
 
the image sketch of the craniums is so dogshit. Why didn’t you actually try to find different skeletal cranium references
Send me a photo of a person from the side and I can easily determine their rating by their silhouette
 
The theory is based on the forward projection of the face.

It claims that based on the forward projection of the face, one can accurately predict the attractiveness of both the side and front profiles.

The forward projection of the face is determined by the profile silhouette.

The image shows comparisons of silhouettes and their hierarchy of attractiveness, translated into the classic looksmax system.

View attachment 4351013
chad is not that memorable?
 
is 66% frontal harmony good or bad
 
nigga side carries just 20% of what generally see rest if your front many GL ppl have shit side profile and vice versa
Side is still important because the structure determines the front
 
You can have a mogger side but ugly front
Your theory is shit
Most moggers out there have better fronts than sides
Also side doesn't even matter
 
You can have a mogger side but ugly front
Your theory is shit
Most moggers out there have better fronts than sides
Also side doesn't even matter
No one thinks the moggers from the Looksmax community are beautiful except the community itself.
 

Similar threads

UMIRINBRAH?
Replies
68
Views
2K
MulletM1chas
MulletM1chas
habeebullah
Replies
46
Views
3K
gandysdiciple
gandysdiciple

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Phaethon
Back
Top