The newest and most accurate theory of face rating!

Akademik_Komarov

Akademik_Komarov

Diamond
Joined
Feb 16, 2024
Posts
1,299
Reputation
569
The theory is based on the forward projection of the face.

It claims that based on the forward projection of the face, one can accurately predict the attractiveness of both the side and front profiles.

The forward projection of the face is determined by the profile silhouette.

The image shows comparisons of silhouettes and their hierarchy of attractiveness, translated into the classic looksmax system.

1763802868781
 
  • Hmm...
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Klasik616, TiktokUser, Meteor21 and 2 others
People with severe orthodontic curvatures are incels
 
Akademik_Komarov said:
The theory is based on the forward projection of the face.

It claims that based on the forward projection of the face, one can accurately predict the attractiveness of both the side and front profiles.

The forward projection of the face is determined by the profile silhouette.

The image shows comparisons of silhouettes and their hierarchy of attractiveness, translated into the classic looksmax system.

View attachment 4351013
Click to expand...
Does this new way of rating make you cl?
 
This theory does not replace the old theories of beauty, but helps solve the same problem without resorting to inaccurate measurements.
The new theory demonstrates the same accuracy as the old ones, and in some cases, even more accurate.
 
JohnDon said:
Side profile doesnt matter enough to me, but I guess I do
Click to expand...
This theory distinguishes between the harmony of the side profile and the forward growth of the face.
Facial growth determines the harmony of BOTH the side and front profiles.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 178409
With this type of analysis, the position of the head in the photo is irrelevant, and playing with the angles won't mislead. Lens distortion doesn't affect this type of analysis at all.
 
Akademik_Komarov said:
The theory is based on the forward projection of the face.

It claims that based on the forward projection of the face, one can accurately predict the attractiveness of both the side and front profiles.

The forward projection of the face is determined by the profile silhouette.

The image shows comparisons of silhouettes and their hierarchy of attractiveness, translated into the classic looksmax system.

View attachment 4351013
Click to expand...
did u make this yourself? :lul:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 86046
What is the point of this thread
 
pfl said:
What is the point of this thread
Click to expand...
to offer people a new, objective, and useful theory of appearance rating
 
  • +1
Reactions: KT-34
nigga side carries just 20% of what generally see rest if your front many GL ppl have shit side profile and vice versa
 
  • +1
Reactions: SomaliSub5
niggero0 said:
nigga side carries just 20% of what generally see rest if your front many GL ppl have shit side profile and vice versa
Click to expand...
forward facial growth DETERMINES the front and side profile
 
look at adriana lima, paul walker, robert pattinson, etcthey are recessed/flat yet still good looking because of their front. plenty of people with great side profiles with chopped fronts on the other hand
 
SomaliaSub5 said:
look at adriana lima, paul walker, robert pattinson, etcthey are recessed/flat yet still good looking because of their front. plenty of people with great side profiles with chopped fronts on the other hand
Click to expand...
Robert Pattinson has a forward facial growth at Chad's level. Adriana Lima and Paul Walker are both at C(S)L level
 

Attachments

  • 1763809960018.png
    1763809960018.png
    50.2 KB · Views: 0
SomaliaSub5 said:
look at adriana lima, paul walker, robert pattinson, etcthey are recessed/flat yet still good looking because of their front. plenty of people with great side profiles with chopped fronts on the other hand
Click to expand...
Robert Pattinson's forward facial growth appears weak because he has a large, overhanging forehead. I've created a silhouette where I've removed the forehead protrusion to make it more visible.
1763810817302
 
Last edited:
Akademik_Komarov said:
The theory is based on the forward projection of the face.

It claims that based on the forward projection of the face, one can accurately predict the attractiveness of both the side and front profiles.

The forward projection of the face is determined by the profile silhouette.

The image shows comparisons of silhouettes and their hierarchy of attractiveness, translated into the classic looksmax system.

View attachment 4351013
Click to expand...
the image sketch of the craniums is so dogshit. Why didn’t you actually try to find different skeletal cranium references
 
  • +1
Reactions: EthiopianMaxxer
TiktokUser said:
the image sketch of the craniums is so dogshit. Why didn’t you actually try to find different skeletal cranium references
Click to expand...
Send me a photo of a person from the side and I can easily determine their rating by their silhouette
 
Akademik_Komarov said:
The theory is based on the forward projection of the face.

It claims that based on the forward projection of the face, one can accurately predict the attractiveness of both the side and front profiles.

The forward projection of the face is determined by the profile silhouette.

The image shows comparisons of silhouettes and their hierarchy of attractiveness, translated into the classic looksmax system.

View attachment 4351013
Click to expand...
chad is not that memorable?
 
TiktokUser said:
the image sketch of the craniums is so dogshit. Why didn’t you actually try to find different skeletal cranium references
Click to expand...
In the "ratings" section, most have flat faces
 
is 66% frontal harmony good or bad
 
eBoy_ said:
is 66% frontal harmony good or bad
Click to expand...
Christian Bale has less harmony, but because of the forward growth of his face, he looks too attractive
 
niggero0 said:
nigga side carries just 20% of what generally see rest if your front many GL ppl have shit side profile and vice versa
Click to expand...
Side is still important because the structure determines the front
 
bump
 
bump
 
You can have a mogger side but ugly front
Your theory is shit
Most moggers out there have better fronts than sides
Also side doesn't even matter
 
Klasik616 said:
You can have a mogger side but ugly front
Your theory is shit
Most moggers out there have better fronts than sides
Also side doesn't even matter
Click to expand...
No one thinks the moggers from the Looksmax community are beautiful except the community itself.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Arbuscular
Theory face reveal
Replies
14
Views
97
оscar
оscar
islaymtbs
  • Poll
Discussion (POLL) face rating
Replies
2
Views
39
islaymtbs
islaymtbs
youriblamegenetics
How boyos in the face rating section be like
Replies
1
Views
17
youriblamegenetics
youriblamegenetics
D
Theory Why are ugly people more annoying and losers most of the time?
Replies
2
Views
44
HardStuckLTN;
HardStuckLTN;
Orbital1
What is Arnold Schwarzeneggers face rating?
Replies
9
Views
52
Orbital1
Orbital1

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (Looksmaxers: 0, Bluepillers: 2)
Back
Top