The official thread of why boobs>ass

copercel123

copercel123

Instrumentalism
Joined
Dec 1, 2024
Posts
7,846
Reputation
15,974
Well i saw that yall really wanted me to make it so here we go:

Song of the thread:
Song:



The official thread of why boobs>ass

Propotions MATTER, so that means that having nice big boobs wont save your girl if her ass is nonexistent. So in this thread I’m not pointing out that boobs are the only thing that matter but that it’s just better than ass. BTW if you read all the thread you’re mentally ill.

IMG 1657



Evolutionary hardcoding
women are the only species where the breasts stay enlarged even when not lactating. That’s not a coincidence, it evolved specifically to grab attention. Boobs aren’t just “fat sacks,” they’re a signal. They say: “I’ve got estrogen, I can reproduce, and I’ve never had a kid yet (if they’re perky and symmetrical).”

Ass? Useful, yeah. Holds fat reserves, shows lumbar curve strength. But every human has an ass. Breasts are unique to women, making them a more exclusive visual cue. You don’t subconsciously crave a trait that both sexes can have.


Study receipts:

Desmond Morris and Owen Lovejoy argue breasts imitate buttocks to signal sexual maturity and grab attention frontally. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleavage_(breasts)


A sharp eye-tracking review confirms evolution wired us to see torso cues, especially boobs, as markers of reproductive value. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6491769/


Visual Circuitry: First Glance Wins


Within 200 ms of seeing a sexy body, the brain’s locking onto the breasts or waist—not the face, not the butt. Breasts are part of the “visual triangle” (eyes to face to cleavage); powerful layout, high arousal.

study receipts

In one eye-tracking experiment, 47 % of men looked at the breasts first, 33 % at the waist,
only 20 % at the face or lower body.

More broad work shows that first fixations land on breasts or waist within 200 ms, and the gaze sticks longer there vs. hips/legs.


Hormone Signals: Boobs Speak Biology


Big, firm, symmetrical, perky breasts = direct estrogen signposts; they also drop hints of age, parity, and fertility. The waist-to-bust ratio, bikini curves , it’s all hormonal billboard pop culture uses, but the biology’s real.

Study receipts:

Men rate medium-to-large, round, perky, non-saggy breasts with close-set nipples as most attractive, firmness and youth-over-size matter.

Colors matter: darker areolae = deeper youth/fertility cues, and men rated those more attractive.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20169468/?utm_source=Google


Asses can be built, boobs can’t

A girl’s ass can be changed, so it’s not rare to see a girl with a nice ass, but seeing a girl with nice boobs is different, especially if she’s between 14-20. They got it naturally and it’s making it rarer to see a girl with nice tits.

What would you prefer:

nice
boobs

IMG 1661

(Credit to @PseudoMaxxer)

IMG 1662

IMG 1664

IMG 1665




Nice ass

IMG 1663

IMG 1666

IMG 1667


Conclusion:
At the end of the day, proportions matter far more than any single feature. You can’t seriously claim a girl is attractive just because she has nice boobs if her lower half is completely lacking, same thing the other way around. A good body is about balance and symmetry.

Now, that being said, if I had to choose between the two, I’d go with boobs , and here’s why: a girl can grow her glutes over time. With consistent training, nutrition, and even some enhancements, a flat ass can turn into a bubble butt. But boobs? That’s genetic. You either got them or you don’t. And most of the time, unless surgery is involved, even then it won’t look natural. you’re not changing your cup size naturally.

So while both are important aesthetically, boobs have the upper hand because they’re harder to “build.” You can sculpt an ass, you can’t sculpt breasts. Proportions will always be king, but in terms of raw, unchangeable value, boobs win.
Bad boobs are exuding low quality, unlike ass that shows that girl isn’t a whore. Big ass=whore trait.



Yeah it’s a shitty thread but just wanted to make it clear: proportions >boobs > ass.

So… what your guys opinions? Ass or tits?


tags:
@AverageTevvezFan @Zagro @BonesmashFinalBoss @kazama


 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Love it
  • JFL
Reactions: Calippo, sprout, LTNUser and 33 others
Well i saw that yall really wanted me to make it so here we go:

Song of the thread:
Song:



The official thread of why boobs>ass

Propotions MATTER, so that means that having nice big boobs wont save your girl if her ass is nonexistent. So in this thread I’m not pointing out that boobs are the only thing that matter but that it’s just better than ass. BTW if you read all the thread you’re mentally ill.

View attachment 3823170


Evolutionary hardcoding
women are the only species where the breasts stay enlarged even when not lactating. That’s not a coincidence, it evolved specifically to grab attention. Boobs aren’t just “fat sacks,” they’re a signal. They say: “I’ve got estrogen, I can reproduce, and I’ve never had a kid yet (if they’re perky and symmetrical).”

Ass? Useful, yeah. Holds fat reserves, shows lumbar curve strength. But every human has an ass. Breasts are unique to women, making them a more exclusive visual cue. You don’t subconsciously crave a trait that both sexes can have.


Study receipts:

Desmond Morris and Owen Lovejoy argue breasts imitate buttocks to signal sexual maturity and grab attention frontally. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleavage_(breasts)


A sharp eye-tracking review confirms evolution wired us to see torso cues, especially boobs, as markers of reproductive value. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6491769/


Visual Circuitry: First Glance Wins


Within 200 ms of seeing a sexy body, the brain’s locking onto the breasts or waist—not the face, not the butt. Breasts are part of the “visual triangle” (eyes to face to cleavage); powerful layout, high arousal.

study receipts

In one eye-tracking experiment, 47 % of men looked at the breasts first, 33 % at the waist,
only 20 % at the face or lower body.

More broad work shows that first fixations land on breasts or waist within 200 ms, and the gaze sticks longer there vs. hips/legs.


Hormone Signals: Boobs Speak Biology


Big, firm, symmetrical, perky breasts = direct estrogen signposts; they also drop hints of age, parity, and fertility. The waist-to-bust ratio, bikini curves , it’s all hormonal billboard pop culture uses, but the biology’s real.

Study receipts:

Men rate medium-to-large, round, perky, non-saggy breasts with close-set nipples as most attractive, firmness and youth-over-size matter.

Colors matter: darker areolae = deeper youth/fertility cues, and men rated those more attractive.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20169468/?utm_source=Google


Asses can be built, boobs can’t

A girl’s ass can be changed, so it’s not rare to see a girl with a nice ass, but seeing a girl with nice boobs is different, especially if she’s between 14-20. They got it naturally and it’s making it rarer to see a girl with nice tits.

What would you prefer:

nice
boobs

View attachment 3823250
(Credit to @PseudoMaxxer)

View attachment 3823252
View attachment 3823256
View attachment 3823270



Nice ass

View attachment 3823265

View attachment 3823271

View attachment 3823273

Conclusion:
At the end of the day, proportions matter far more than any single feature. You can’t seriously claim a girl is attractive just because she has nice boobs if her lower half is completely lacking, same thing the other way around. A good body is about balance and symmetry.

Now, that being said, if I had to choose between the two, I’d go with boobs , and here’s why: a girl can grow her glutes over time. With consistent training, nutrition, and even some enhancements, a flat ass can turn into a bubble butt. But boobs? That’s genetic. You either got them or you don’t. And most of the time, unless surgery is involved, even then it won’t look natural. you’re not changing your cup size naturally.

So while both are important aesthetically, boobs have the upper hand because they’re harder to “build.” You can sculpt an ass, you can’t sculpt breasts. Proportions will always be king, but in terms of raw, unchangeable value, boobs win.
Bad boobs are exuding low quality, unlike ass that shows that girl isn’t a whore. Big ass=whore trait.



Yeah it’s a shitty thread but just wanted to make it clear: proportions >boobs > ass.

So… what your guys opinions? Ass or tits?


tags:
@AverageTevvezFan @Zagro @BonesmashFinalBoss @kazama



Im too fucking lazy to read, what I've known is that boobs>>>>ass 100%
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: LTNUser, Kiwi'sSub5, SharpOrange and 5 others
Well i saw that yall really wanted me to make it so here we go:

Song of the thread:
Song:



The official thread of why boobs>ass

Propotions MATTER, so that means that having nice big boobs wont save your girl if her ass is nonexistent. So in this thread I’m not pointing out that boobs are the only thing that matter but that it’s just better than ass. BTW if you read all the thread you’re mentally ill.

View attachment 3823170


Evolutionary hardcoding
women are the only species where the breasts stay enlarged even when not lactating. That’s not a coincidence, it evolved specifically to grab attention. Boobs aren’t just “fat sacks,” they’re a signal. They say: “I’ve got estrogen, I can reproduce, and I’ve never had a kid yet (if they’re perky and symmetrical).”

Ass? Useful, yeah. Holds fat reserves, shows lumbar curve strength. But every human has an ass. Breasts are unique to women, making them a more exclusive visual cue. You don’t subconsciously crave a trait that both sexes can have.


Study receipts:

Desmond Morris and Owen Lovejoy argue breasts imitate buttocks to signal sexual maturity and grab attention frontally. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleavage_(breasts)


A sharp eye-tracking review confirms evolution wired us to see torso cues, especially boobs, as markers of reproductive value. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6491769/


Visual Circuitry: First Glance Wins


Within 200 ms of seeing a sexy body, the brain’s locking onto the breasts or waist—not the face, not the butt. Breasts are part of the “visual triangle” (eyes to face to cleavage); powerful layout, high arousal.

study receipts

In one eye-tracking experiment, 47 % of men looked at the breasts first, 33 % at the waist,
only 20 % at the face or lower body.

More broad work shows that first fixations land on breasts or waist within 200 ms, and the gaze sticks longer there vs. hips/legs.


Hormone Signals: Boobs Speak Biology


Big, firm, symmetrical, perky breasts = direct estrogen signposts; they also drop hints of age, parity, and fertility. The waist-to-bust ratio, bikini curves , it’s all hormonal billboard pop culture uses, but the biology’s real.

Study receipts:

Men rate medium-to-large, round, perky, non-saggy breasts with close-set nipples as most attractive, firmness and youth-over-size matter.

Colors matter: darker areolae = deeper youth/fertility cues, and men rated those more attractive.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20169468/?utm_source=Google


Asses can be built, boobs can’t

A girl’s ass can be changed, so it’s not rare to see a girl with a nice ass, but seeing a girl with nice boobs is different, especially if she’s between 14-20. They got it naturally and it’s making it rarer to see a girl with nice tits.

What would you prefer:

nice
boobs

View attachment 3823250
(Credit to @PseudoMaxxer)

View attachment 3823252
View attachment 3823256
View attachment 3823270



Nice ass

View attachment 3823265

View attachment 3823271

View attachment 3823273

Conclusion:
At the end of the day, proportions matter far more than any single feature. You can’t seriously claim a girl is attractive just because she has nice boobs if her lower half is completely lacking, same thing the other way around. A good body is about balance and symmetry.

Now, that being said, if I had to choose between the two, I’d go with boobs , and here’s why: a girl can grow her glutes over time. With consistent training, nutrition, and even some enhancements, a flat ass can turn into a bubble butt. But boobs? That’s genetic. You either got them or you don’t. And most of the time, unless surgery is involved, even then it won’t look natural. you’re not changing your cup size naturally.

So while both are important aesthetically, boobs have the upper hand because they’re harder to “build.” You can sculpt an ass, you can’t sculpt breasts. Proportions will always be king, but in terms of raw, unchangeable value, boobs win.
Bad boobs are exuding low quality, unlike ass that shows that girl isn’t a whore. Big ass=whore trait.



Yeah it’s a shitty thread but just wanted to make it clear: proportions >boobs > ass.

So… what your guys opinions? Ass or tits?


tags:
@AverageTevvezFan @Zagro @BonesmashFinalBoss @kazama



@Debetro @whitebitchslayer @Bitchwhipper2
@got.daim @heightmaxxing
 
  • +1
Reactions: LTNUser, whitebitchslayer, heightmaxxing and 2 others
Zio activities
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Iraniancel, jeff1234 and BonesmashFinalBoss
i like both 😂
 
  • +1
Reactions: LTNUser, Iraniancel, ss07 and 3 others
Well i saw that yall really wanted me to make it so here we go:

Song of the thread:
Song:



The official thread of why boobs>ass

Propotions MATTER, so that means that having nice big boobs wont save your girl if her ass is nonexistent. So in this thread I’m not pointing out that boobs are the only thing that matter but that it’s just better than ass. BTW if you read all the thread you’re mentally ill.

View attachment 3823170


Evolutionary hardcoding
women are the only species where the breasts stay enlarged even when not lactating. That’s not a coincidence, it evolved specifically to grab attention. Boobs aren’t just “fat sacks,” they’re a signal. They say: “I’ve got estrogen, I can reproduce, and I’ve never had a kid yet (if they’re perky and symmetrical).”

Ass? Useful, yeah. Holds fat reserves, shows lumbar curve strength. But every human has an ass. Breasts are unique to women, making them a more exclusive visual cue. You don’t subconsciously crave a trait that both sexes can have.


Study receipts:

Desmond Morris and Owen Lovejoy argue breasts imitate buttocks to signal sexual maturity and grab attention frontally. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleavage_(breasts)


A sharp eye-tracking review confirms evolution wired us to see torso cues, especially boobs, as markers of reproductive value. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6491769/


Visual Circuitry: First Glance Wins


Within 200 ms of seeing a sexy body, the brain’s locking onto the breasts or waist—not the face, not the butt. Breasts are part of the “visual triangle” (eyes to face to cleavage); powerful layout, high arousal.

study receipts

In one eye-tracking experiment, 47 % of men looked at the breasts first, 33 % at the waist,
only 20 % at the face or lower body.

More broad work shows that first fixations land on breasts or waist within 200 ms, and the gaze sticks longer there vs. hips/legs.


Hormone Signals: Boobs Speak Biology


Big, firm, symmetrical, perky breasts = direct estrogen signposts; they also drop hints of age, parity, and fertility. The waist-to-bust ratio, bikini curves , it’s all hormonal billboard pop culture uses, but the biology’s real.

Study receipts:

Men rate medium-to-large, round, perky, non-saggy breasts with close-set nipples as most attractive, firmness and youth-over-size matter.

Colors matter: darker areolae = deeper youth/fertility cues, and men rated those more attractive.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20169468/?utm_source=Google


Asses can be built, boobs can’t

A girl’s ass can be changed, so it’s not rare to see a girl with a nice ass, but seeing a girl with nice boobs is different, especially if she’s between 14-20. They got it naturally and it’s making it rarer to see a girl with nice tits.

What would you prefer:

nice
boobs

View attachment 3823250
(Credit to @PseudoMaxxer)

View attachment 3823252
View attachment 3823256
View attachment 3823270



Nice ass

View attachment 3823265

View attachment 3823271

View attachment 3823273

Conclusion:
At the end of the day, proportions matter far more than any single feature. You can’t seriously claim a girl is attractive just because she has nice boobs if her lower half is completely lacking, same thing the other way around. A good body is about balance and symmetry.

Now, that being said, if I had to choose between the two, I’d go with boobs , and here’s why: a girl can grow her glutes over time. With consistent training, nutrition, and even some enhancements, a flat ass can turn into a bubble butt. But boobs? That’s genetic. You either got them or you don’t. And most of the time, unless surgery is involved, even then it won’t look natural. you’re not changing your cup size naturally.

So while both are important aesthetically, boobs have the upper hand because they’re harder to “build.” You can sculpt an ass, you can’t sculpt breasts. Proportions will always be king, but in terms of raw, unchangeable value, boobs win.
Bad boobs are exuding low quality, unlike ass that shows that girl isn’t a whore. Big ass=whore trait.



Yeah it’s a shitty thread but just wanted to make it clear: proportions >boobs > ass.

So… what your guys opinions? Ass or tits?


tags:
@AverageTevvezFan @Zagro @BonesmashFinalBoss @kazama



@sub5outsider @anthony111553
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: LTNUser, jeff1234, BonesmashFinalBoss and 1 other person
Well i saw that yall really wanted me to make it so here we go:

Song of the thread:
Song:



The official thread of why boobs>ass

Propotions MATTER, so that means that having nice big boobs wont save your girl if her ass is nonexistent. So in this thread I’m not pointing out that boobs are the only thing that matter but that it’s just better than ass. BTW if you read all the thread you’re mentally ill.

View attachment 3823170


Evolutionary hardcoding
women are the only species where the breasts stay enlarged even when not lactating. That’s not a coincidence, it evolved specifically to grab attention. Boobs aren’t just “fat sacks,” they’re a signal. They say: “I’ve got estrogen, I can reproduce, and I’ve never had a kid yet (if they’re perky and symmetrical).”

Ass? Useful, yeah. Holds fat reserves, shows lumbar curve strength. But every human has an ass. Breasts are unique to women, making them a more exclusive visual cue. You don’t subconsciously crave a trait that both sexes can have.


Study receipts:

Desmond Morris and Owen Lovejoy argue breasts imitate buttocks to signal sexual maturity and grab attention frontally. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleavage_(breasts)


A sharp eye-tracking review confirms evolution wired us to see torso cues, especially boobs, as markers of reproductive value. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6491769/


Visual Circuitry: First Glance Wins


Within 200 ms of seeing a sexy body, the brain’s locking onto the breasts or waist—not the face, not the butt. Breasts are part of the “visual triangle” (eyes to face to cleavage); powerful layout, high arousal.

study receipts

In one eye-tracking experiment, 47 % of men looked at the breasts first, 33 % at the waist,
only 20 % at the face or lower body.

More broad work shows that first fixations land on breasts or waist within 200 ms, and the gaze sticks longer there vs. hips/legs.


Hormone Signals: Boobs Speak Biology


Big, firm, symmetrical, perky breasts = direct estrogen signposts; they also drop hints of age, parity, and fertility. The waist-to-bust ratio, bikini curves , it’s all hormonal billboard pop culture uses, but the biology’s real.

Study receipts:

Men rate medium-to-large, round, perky, non-saggy breasts with close-set nipples as most attractive, firmness and youth-over-size matter.

Colors matter: darker areolae = deeper youth/fertility cues, and men rated those more attractive.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20169468/?utm_source=Google


Asses can be built, boobs can’t

A girl’s ass can be changed, so it’s not rare to see a girl with a nice ass, but seeing a girl with nice boobs is different, especially if she’s between 14-20. They got it naturally and it’s making it rarer to see a girl with nice tits.

What would you prefer:

nice
boobs

View attachment 3823250
(Credit to @PseudoMaxxer)

View attachment 3823252
View attachment 3823256
View attachment 3823270



Nice ass

View attachment 3823265

View attachment 3823271

View attachment 3823273

Conclusion:
At the end of the day, proportions matter far more than any single feature. You can’t seriously claim a girl is attractive just because she has nice boobs if her lower half is completely lacking, same thing the other way around. A good body is about balance and symmetry.

Now, that being said, if I had to choose between the two, I’d go with boobs , and here’s why: a girl can grow her glutes over time. With consistent training, nutrition, and even some enhancements, a flat ass can turn into a bubble butt. But boobs? That’s genetic. You either got them or you don’t. And most of the time, unless surgery is involved, even then it won’t look natural. you’re not changing your cup size naturally.

So while both are important aesthetically, boobs have the upper hand because they’re harder to “build.” You can sculpt an ass, you can’t sculpt breasts. Proportions will always be king, but in terms of raw, unchangeable value, boobs win.
Bad boobs are exuding low quality, unlike ass that shows that girl isn’t a whore. Big ass=whore trait.



Yeah it’s a shitty thread but just wanted to make it clear: proportions >boobs > ass.

So… what your guys opinions? Ass or tits?


tags:
@AverageTevvezFan @Zagro @BonesmashFinalBoss @kazama



high iq mirin
 
  • +1
Reactions: LTNUser, jeff1234, BonesmashFinalBoss and 2 others
Pink meaty soles>>>>>>all
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: LTNUser, Meteor21, jeff1234 and 3 others
Lets f go
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Calippo, LTNUser, vincentzygo and 4 others
Tbh big asses turning me off
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: LTNUser, AverageTevvezFan, jeff1234 and 4 others
Well i saw that yall really wanted me to make it so here we go:

Song of the thread:
Song:



The official thread of why boobs>ass

Propotions MATTER, so that means that having nice big boobs wont save your girl if her ass is nonexistent. So in this thread I’m not pointing out that boobs are the only thing that matter but that it’s just better than ass. BTW if you read all the thread you’re mentally ill.

View attachment 3823170


Evolutionary hardcoding
women are the only species where the breasts stay enlarged even when not lactating. That’s not a coincidence, it evolved specifically to grab attention. Boobs aren’t just “fat sacks,” they’re a signal. They say: “I’ve got estrogen, I can reproduce, and I’ve never had a kid yet (if they’re perky and symmetrical).”

Ass? Useful, yeah. Holds fat reserves, shows lumbar curve strength. But every human has an ass. Breasts are unique to women, making them a more exclusive visual cue. You don’t subconsciously crave a trait that both sexes can have.


Study receipts:

Desmond Morris and Owen Lovejoy argue breasts imitate buttocks to signal sexual maturity and grab attention frontally. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleavage_(breasts)


A sharp eye-tracking review confirms evolution wired us to see torso cues, especially boobs, as markers of reproductive value. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6491769/


Visual Circuitry: First Glance Wins


Within 200 ms of seeing a sexy body, the brain’s locking onto the breasts or waist—not the face, not the butt. Breasts are part of the “visual triangle” (eyes to face to cleavage); powerful layout, high arousal.

study receipts

In one eye-tracking experiment, 47 % of men looked at the breasts first, 33 % at the waist,
only 20 % at the face or lower body.

More broad work shows that first fixations land on breasts or waist within 200 ms, and the gaze sticks longer there vs. hips/legs.


Hormone Signals: Boobs Speak Biology


Big, firm, symmetrical, perky breasts = direct estrogen signposts; they also drop hints of age, parity, and fertility. The waist-to-bust ratio, bikini curves , it’s all hormonal billboard pop culture uses, but the biology’s real.

Study receipts:

Men rate medium-to-large, round, perky, non-saggy breasts with close-set nipples as most attractive, firmness and youth-over-size matter.

Colors matter: darker areolae = deeper youth/fertility cues, and men rated those more attractive.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20169468/?utm_source=Google


Asses can be built, boobs can’t

A girl’s ass can be changed, so it’s not rare to see a girl with a nice ass, but seeing a girl with nice boobs is different, especially if she’s between 14-20. They got it naturally and it’s making it rarer to see a girl with nice tits.

What would you prefer:

nice
boobs

View attachment 3823250
(Credit to @PseudoMaxxer)

View attachment 3823252
View attachment 3823256
View attachment 3823270



Nice ass

View attachment 3823265

View attachment 3823271

View attachment 3823273

Conclusion:
At the end of the day, proportions matter far more than any single feature. You can’t seriously claim a girl is attractive just because she has nice boobs if her lower half is completely lacking, same thing the other way around. A good body is about balance and symmetry.

Now, that being said, if I had to choose between the two, I’d go with boobs , and here’s why: a girl can grow her glutes over time. With consistent training, nutrition, and even some enhancements, a flat ass can turn into a bubble butt. But boobs? That’s genetic. You either got them or you don’t. And most of the time, unless surgery is involved, even then it won’t look natural. you’re not changing your cup size naturally.

So while both are important aesthetically, boobs have the upper hand because they’re harder to “build.” You can sculpt an ass, you can’t sculpt breasts. Proportions will always be king, but in terms of raw, unchangeable value, boobs win.
Bad boobs are exuding low quality, unlike ass that shows that girl isn’t a whore. Big ass=whore trait.



Yeah it’s a shitty thread but just wanted to make it clear: proportions >boobs > ass.

So… what your guys opinions? Ass or tits?


tags:
@AverageTevvezFan @Zagro @BonesmashFinalBoss @kazama



Sometimes you have to tag spam.

@VV62 @Gaygymmaxx @ToryToad @Hernan @Jatt
 
  • +1
  • Love it
  • JFL
Reactions: ToryToad, jeff1234, BonesmashFinalBoss and 2 others
  • +1
Reactions: ss07, talcel, jeff1234 and 3 others
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Xangsane is SHIT, talcel, jeff1234 and 4 others
the thing with boobs is that you either have them or you dont every girl can make her ass look good
 
  • +1
Reactions: karmacita901, jeff1234, choppedshyt and 3 others
Well i saw that yall really wanted me to make it so here we go:

Song of the thread:
Song:



The official thread of why boobs>ass

Propotions MATTER, so that means that having nice big boobs wont save your girl if her ass is nonexistent. So in this thread I’m not pointing out that boobs are the only thing that matter but that it’s just better than ass. BTW if you read all the thread you’re mentally ill.

View attachment 3823170


Evolutionary hardcoding
women are the only species where the breasts stay enlarged even when not lactating. That’s not a coincidence, it evolved specifically to grab attention. Boobs aren’t just “fat sacks,” they’re a signal. They say: “I’ve got estrogen, I can reproduce, and I’ve never had a kid yet (if they’re perky and symmetrical).”

Ass? Useful, yeah. Holds fat reserves, shows lumbar curve strength. But every human has an ass. Breasts are unique to women, making them a more exclusive visual cue. You don’t subconsciously crave a trait that both sexes can have.


Study receipts:

Desmond Morris and Owen Lovejoy argue breasts imitate buttocks to signal sexual maturity and grab attention frontally. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleavage_(breasts)


A sharp eye-tracking review confirms evolution wired us to see torso cues, especially boobs, as markers of reproductive value. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6491769/


Visual Circuitry: First Glance Wins


Within 200 ms of seeing a sexy body, the brain’s locking onto the breasts or waist—not the face, not the butt. Breasts are part of the “visual triangle” (eyes to face to cleavage); powerful layout, high arousal.

study receipts

In one eye-tracking experiment, 47 % of men looked at the breasts first, 33 % at the waist,
only 20 % at the face or lower body.

More broad work shows that first fixations land on breasts or waist within 200 ms, and the gaze sticks longer there vs. hips/legs.


Hormone Signals: Boobs Speak Biology


Big, firm, symmetrical, perky breasts = direct estrogen signposts; they also drop hints of age, parity, and fertility. The waist-to-bust ratio, bikini curves , it’s all hormonal billboard pop culture uses, but the biology’s real.

Study receipts:

Men rate medium-to-large, round, perky, non-saggy breasts with close-set nipples as most attractive, firmness and youth-over-size matter.

Colors matter: darker areolae = deeper youth/fertility cues, and men rated those more attractive.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20169468/?utm_source=Google


Asses can be built, boobs can’t

A girl’s ass can be changed, so it’s not rare to see a girl with a nice ass, but seeing a girl with nice boobs is different, especially if she’s between 14-20. They got it naturally and it’s making it rarer to see a girl with nice tits.

What would you prefer:

nice
boobs

View attachment 3823250
(Credit to @PseudoMaxxer)

View attachment 3823252
View attachment 3823256
View attachment 3823270



Nice ass

View attachment 3823265

View attachment 3823271

View attachment 3823273

Conclusion:
At the end of the day, proportions matter far more than any single feature. You can’t seriously claim a girl is attractive just because she has nice boobs if her lower half is completely lacking, same thing the other way around. A good body is about balance and symmetry.

Now, that being said, if I had to choose between the two, I’d go with boobs , and here’s why: a girl can grow her glutes over time. With consistent training, nutrition, and even some enhancements, a flat ass can turn into a bubble butt. But boobs? That’s genetic. You either got them or you don’t. And most of the time, unless surgery is involved, even then it won’t look natural. you’re not changing your cup size naturally.

So while both are important aesthetically, boobs have the upper hand because they’re harder to “build.” You can sculpt an ass, you can’t sculpt breasts. Proportions will always be king, but in terms of raw, unchangeable value, boobs win.
Bad boobs are exuding low quality, unlike ass that shows that girl isn’t a whore. Big ass=whore trait.



Yeah it’s a shitty thread but just wanted to make it clear: proportions >boobs > ass.

So… what your guys opinions? Ass or tits?


tags:
@AverageTevvezFan @Zagro @BonesmashFinalBoss @kazama



@vincentzygo @VohnnyBoy @jaco @Skinnycel_ @jeff1234
 
  • +1
Reactions: Skinnycel_, jeff1234 and BonesmashFinalBoss
Well i saw that yall really wanted me to make it so here we go:

Song of the thread:
Song:



The official thread of why boobs>ass

Propotions MATTER, so that means that having nice big boobs wont save your girl if her ass is nonexistent. So in this thread I’m not pointing out that boobs are the only thing that matter but that it’s just better than ass. BTW if you read all the thread you’re mentally ill.

View attachment 3823170


Evolutionary hardcoding
women are the only species where the breasts stay enlarged even when not lactating. That’s not a coincidence, it evolved specifically to grab attention. Boobs aren’t just “fat sacks,” they’re a signal. They say: “I’ve got estrogen, I can reproduce, and I’ve never had a kid yet (if they’re perky and symmetrical).”

Ass? Useful, yeah. Holds fat reserves, shows lumbar curve strength. But every human has an ass. Breasts are unique to women, making them a more exclusive visual cue. You don’t subconsciously crave a trait that both sexes can have.


Study receipts:

Desmond Morris and Owen Lovejoy argue breasts imitate buttocks to signal sexual maturity and grab attention frontally. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleavage_(breasts)


A sharp eye-tracking review confirms evolution wired us to see torso cues, especially boobs, as markers of reproductive value. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6491769/


Visual Circuitry: First Glance Wins


Within 200 ms of seeing a sexy body, the brain’s locking onto the breasts or waist—not the face, not the butt. Breasts are part of the “visual triangle” (eyes to face to cleavage); powerful layout, high arousal.

study receipts

In one eye-tracking experiment, 47 % of men looked at the breasts first, 33 % at the waist,
only 20 % at the face or lower body.

More broad work shows that first fixations land on breasts or waist within 200 ms, and the gaze sticks longer there vs. hips/legs.


Hormone Signals: Boobs Speak Biology


Big, firm, symmetrical, perky breasts = direct estrogen signposts; they also drop hints of age, parity, and fertility. The waist-to-bust ratio, bikini curves , it’s all hormonal billboard pop culture uses, but the biology’s real.

Study receipts:

Men rate medium-to-large, round, perky, non-saggy breasts with close-set nipples as most attractive, firmness and youth-over-size matter.

Colors matter: darker areolae = deeper youth/fertility cues, and men rated those more attractive.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20169468/?utm_source=Google


Asses can be built, boobs can’t

A girl’s ass can be changed, so it’s not rare to see a girl with a nice ass, but seeing a girl with nice boobs is different, especially if she’s between 14-20. They got it naturally and it’s making it rarer to see a girl with nice tits.

What would you prefer:

nice
boobs

View attachment 3823250
(Credit to @PseudoMaxxer)

View attachment 3823252
View attachment 3823256
View attachment 3823270



Nice ass

View attachment 3823265

View attachment 3823271

View attachment 3823273

Conclusion:
At the end of the day, proportions matter far more than any single feature. You can’t seriously claim a girl is attractive just because she has nice boobs if her lower half is completely lacking, same thing the other way around. A good body is about balance and symmetry.

Now, that being said, if I had to choose between the two, I’d go with boobs , and here’s why: a girl can grow her glutes over time. With consistent training, nutrition, and even some enhancements, a flat ass can turn into a bubble butt. But boobs? That’s genetic. You either got them or you don’t. And most of the time, unless surgery is involved, even then it won’t look natural. you’re not changing your cup size naturally.

So while both are important aesthetically, boobs have the upper hand because they’re harder to “build.” You can sculpt an ass, you can’t sculpt breasts. Proportions will always be king, but in terms of raw, unchangeable value, boobs win.
Bad boobs are exuding low quality, unlike ass that shows that girl isn’t a whore. Big ass=whore trait.



Yeah it’s a shitty thread but just wanted to make it clear: proportions >boobs > ass.

So… what your guys opinions? Ass or tits?


tags:
@AverageTevvezFan @Zagro @BonesmashFinalBoss @kazama



reading all of it later.
 
  • +1
Reactions: jeff1234 and BonesmashFinalBoss
the thing with boobs is that you either have them or you dont every girl can make her ass look good
Yeah that’s exactly what I said there.
 
  • +1
Reactions: jeff1234 and BonesmashFinalBoss
arm to tit ratio is very important

 
  • +1
Reactions: HundredManSlayer, JL~, jeff1234 and 4 others
Well i saw that yall really wanted me to make it so here we go:

Song of the thread:
Song:



The official thread of why boobs>ass

Propotions MATTER, so that means that having nice big boobs wont save your girl if her ass is nonexistent. So in this thread I’m not pointing out that boobs are the only thing that matter but that it’s just better than ass. BTW if you read all the thread you’re mentally ill.

View attachment 3823170


Evolutionary hardcoding
women are the only species where the breasts stay enlarged even when not lactating. That’s not a coincidence, it evolved specifically to grab attention. Boobs aren’t just “fat sacks,” they’re a signal. They say: “I’ve got estrogen, I can reproduce, and I’ve never had a kid yet (if they’re perky and symmetrical).”

Ass? Useful, yeah. Holds fat reserves, shows lumbar curve strength. But every human has an ass. Breasts are unique to women, making them a more exclusive visual cue. You don’t subconsciously crave a trait that both sexes can have.


Study receipts:

Desmond Morris and Owen Lovejoy argue breasts imitate buttocks to signal sexual maturity and grab attention frontally. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleavage_(breasts)


A sharp eye-tracking review confirms evolution wired us to see torso cues, especially boobs, as markers of reproductive value. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6491769/


Visual Circuitry: First Glance Wins


Within 200 ms of seeing a sexy body, the brain’s locking onto the breasts or waist—not the face, not the butt. Breasts are part of the “visual triangle” (eyes to face to cleavage); powerful layout, high arousal.

study receipts

In one eye-tracking experiment, 47 % of men looked at the breasts first, 33 % at the waist,
only 20 % at the face or lower body.

More broad work shows that first fixations land on breasts or waist within 200 ms, and the gaze sticks longer there vs. hips/legs.


Hormone Signals: Boobs Speak Biology


Big, firm, symmetrical, perky breasts = direct estrogen signposts; they also drop hints of age, parity, and fertility. The waist-to-bust ratio, bikini curves , it’s all hormonal billboard pop culture uses, but the biology’s real.

Study receipts:

Men rate medium-to-large, round, perky, non-saggy breasts with close-set nipples as most attractive, firmness and youth-over-size matter.

Colors matter: darker areolae = deeper youth/fertility cues, and men rated those more attractive.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20169468/?utm_source=Google


Asses can be built, boobs can’t

A girl’s ass can be changed, so it’s not rare to see a girl with a nice ass, but seeing a girl with nice boobs is different, especially if she’s between 14-20. They got it naturally and it’s making it rarer to see a girl with nice tits.

What would you prefer:

nice
boobs

View attachment 3823250
(Credit to @PseudoMaxxer)

View attachment 3823252
View attachment 3823256
View attachment 3823270



Nice ass

View attachment 3823265

View attachment 3823271

View attachment 3823273

Conclusion:
At the end of the day, proportions matter far more than any single feature. You can’t seriously claim a girl is attractive just because she has nice boobs if her lower half is completely lacking, same thing the other way around. A good body is about balance and symmetry.

Now, that being said, if I had to choose between the two, I’d go with boobs , and here’s why: a girl can grow her glutes over time. With consistent training, nutrition, and even some enhancements, a flat ass can turn into a bubble butt. But boobs? That’s genetic. You either got them or you don’t. And most of the time, unless surgery is involved, even then it won’t look natural. you’re not changing your cup size naturally.

So while both are important aesthetically, boobs have the upper hand because they’re harder to “build.” You can sculpt an ass, you can’t sculpt breasts. Proportions will always be king, but in terms of raw, unchangeable value, boobs win.
Bad boobs are exuding low quality, unlike ass that shows that girl isn’t a whore. Big ass=whore trait.



Yeah it’s a shitty thread but just wanted to make it clear: proportions >boobs > ass.

So… what your guys opinions? Ass or tits?


tags:
@AverageTevvezFan @Zagro @BonesmashFinalBoss @kazama



@KeepCopingLads @Chimera @spongebob @autistic_tendencies
 
  • +1
Reactions: autistic_tendencies, jeff1234, Darkeningstar and 1 other person
Being into ass is a nigger trait.
 
  • +1
Reactions: deb1l, autistic_tendencies, jeff1234 and 5 others
We need @Clavicular and @androgenic to tear this apart in another stream 🤣🤣🤣✌️💯
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: HundredManSlayer, Shinichi, jeff1234 and 2 others
Well i saw that yall really wanted me to make it so here we go:

Song of the thread:
Song:



The official thread of why boobs>ass

Propotions MATTER, so that means that having nice big boobs wont save your girl if her ass is nonexistent. So in this thread I’m not pointing out that boobs are the only thing that matter but that it’s just better than ass. BTW if you read all the thread you’re mentally ill.

View attachment 3823170


Evolutionary hardcoding
women are the only species where the breasts stay enlarged even when not lactating. That’s not a coincidence, it evolved specifically to grab attention. Boobs aren’t just “fat sacks,” they’re a signal. They say: “I’ve got estrogen, I can reproduce, and I’ve never had a kid yet (if they’re perky and symmetrical).”

Ass? Useful, yeah. Holds fat reserves, shows lumbar curve strength. But every human has an ass. Breasts are unique to women, making them a more exclusive visual cue. You don’t subconsciously crave a trait that both sexes can have.


Study receipts:

Desmond Morris and Owen Lovejoy argue breasts imitate buttocks to signal sexual maturity and grab attention frontally. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleavage_(breasts)


A sharp eye-tracking review confirms evolution wired us to see torso cues, especially boobs, as markers of reproductive value. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6491769/


Visual Circuitry: First Glance Wins


Within 200 ms of seeing a sexy body, the brain’s locking onto the breasts or waist—not the face, not the butt. Breasts are part of the “visual triangle” (eyes to face to cleavage); powerful layout, high arousal.

study receipts

In one eye-tracking experiment, 47 % of men looked at the breasts first, 33 % at the waist,
only 20 % at the face or lower body.

More broad work shows that first fixations land on breasts or waist within 200 ms, and the gaze sticks longer there vs. hips/legs.


Hormone Signals: Boobs Speak Biology


Big, firm, symmetrical, perky breasts = direct estrogen signposts; they also drop hints of age, parity, and fertility. The waist-to-bust ratio, bikini curves , it’s all hormonal billboard pop culture uses, but the biology’s real.

Study receipts:

Men rate medium-to-large, round, perky, non-saggy breasts with close-set nipples as most attractive, firmness and youth-over-size matter.

Colors matter: darker areolae = deeper youth/fertility cues, and men rated those more attractive.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20169468/?utm_source=Google


Asses can be built, boobs can’t

A girl’s ass can be changed, so it’s not rare to see a girl with a nice ass, but seeing a girl with nice boobs is different, especially if she’s between 14-20. They got it naturally and it’s making it rarer to see a girl with nice tits.

What would you prefer:

nice
boobs

View attachment 3823250
(Credit to @PseudoMaxxer)

View attachment 3823252
View attachment 3823256
View attachment 3823270



Nice ass

View attachment 3823265

View attachment 3823271

View attachment 3823273

Conclusion:
At the end of the day, proportions matter far more than any single feature. You can’t seriously claim a girl is attractive just because she has nice boobs if her lower half is completely lacking, same thing the other way around. A good body is about balance and symmetry.

Now, that being said, if I had to choose between the two, I’d go with boobs , and here’s why: a girl can grow her glutes over time. With consistent training, nutrition, and even some enhancements, a flat ass can turn into a bubble butt. But boobs? That’s genetic. You either got them or you don’t. And most of the time, unless surgery is involved, even then it won’t look natural. you’re not changing your cup size naturally.

So while both are important aesthetically, boobs have the upper hand because they’re harder to “build.” You can sculpt an ass, you can’t sculpt breasts. Proportions will always be king, but in terms of raw, unchangeable value, boobs win.
Bad boobs are exuding low quality, unlike ass that shows that girl isn’t a whore. Big ass=whore trait.



Yeah it’s a shitty thread but just wanted to make it clear: proportions >boobs > ass.

So… what your guys opinions? Ass or tits?


tags:
@AverageTevvezFan @Zagro @BonesmashFinalBoss @kazama



@pusk @.zonic @AverageCurryEnjoyer @Mainlander
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mainlander, jeff1234, BonesmashFinalBoss and 2 others
Well i saw that yall really wanted me to make it so here we go:

Song of the thread:
Song:



The official thread of why boobs>ass

Propotions MATTER, so that means that having nice big boobs wont save your girl if her ass is nonexistent. So in this thread I’m not pointing out that boobs are the only thing that matter but that it’s just better than ass. BTW if you read all the thread you’re mentally ill.

View attachment 3823170


Evolutionary hardcoding
women are the only species where the breasts stay enlarged even when not lactating. That’s not a coincidence, it evolved specifically to grab attention. Boobs aren’t just “fat sacks,” they’re a signal. They say: “I’ve got estrogen, I can reproduce, and I’ve never had a kid yet (if they’re perky and symmetrical).”

Ass? Useful, yeah. Holds fat reserves, shows lumbar curve strength. But every human has an ass. Breasts are unique to women, making them a more exclusive visual cue. You don’t subconsciously crave a trait that both sexes can have.


Study receipts:

Desmond Morris and Owen Lovejoy argue breasts imitate buttocks to signal sexual maturity and grab attention frontally. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleavage_(breasts)


A sharp eye-tracking review confirms evolution wired us to see torso cues, especially boobs, as markers of reproductive value. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6491769/


Visual Circuitry: First Glance Wins


Within 200 ms of seeing a sexy body, the brain’s locking onto the breasts or waist—not the face, not the butt. Breasts are part of the “visual triangle” (eyes to face to cleavage); powerful layout, high arousal.

study receipts

In one eye-tracking experiment, 47 % of men looked at the breasts first, 33 % at the waist,
only 20 % at the face or lower body.

More broad work shows that first fixations land on breasts or waist within 200 ms, and the gaze sticks longer there vs. hips/legs.


Hormone Signals: Boobs Speak Biology


Big, firm, symmetrical, perky breasts = direct estrogen signposts; they also drop hints of age, parity, and fertility. The waist-to-bust ratio, bikini curves , it’s all hormonal billboard pop culture uses, but the biology’s real.

Study receipts:

Men rate medium-to-large, round, perky, non-saggy breasts with close-set nipples as most attractive, firmness and youth-over-size matter.

Colors matter: darker areolae = deeper youth/fertility cues, and men rated those more attractive.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20169468/?utm_source=Google


Asses can be built, boobs can’t

A girl’s ass can be changed, so it’s not rare to see a girl with a nice ass, but seeing a girl with nice boobs is different, especially if she’s between 14-20. They got it naturally and it’s making it rarer to see a girl with nice tits.

What would you prefer:

nice
boobs

View attachment 3823250
(Credit to @PseudoMaxxer)

View attachment 3823252
View attachment 3823256
View attachment 3823270



Nice ass

View attachment 3823265

View attachment 3823271

View attachment 3823273

Conclusion:
At the end of the day, proportions matter far more than any single feature. You can’t seriously claim a girl is attractive just because she has nice boobs if her lower half is completely lacking, same thing the other way around. A good body is about balance and symmetry.

Now, that being said, if I had to choose between the two, I’d go with boobs , and here’s why: a girl can grow her glutes over time. With consistent training, nutrition, and even some enhancements, a flat ass can turn into a bubble butt. But boobs? That’s genetic. You either got them or you don’t. And most of the time, unless surgery is involved, even then it won’t look natural. you’re not changing your cup size naturally.

So while both are important aesthetically, boobs have the upper hand because they’re harder to “build.” You can sculpt an ass, you can’t sculpt breasts. Proportions will always be king, but in terms of raw, unchangeable value, boobs win.
Bad boobs are exuding low quality, unlike ass that shows that girl isn’t a whore. Big ass=whore trait.



Yeah it’s a shitty thread but just wanted to make it clear: proportions >boobs > ass.

So… what your guys opinions? Ass or tits?


tags:
@AverageTevvezFan @Zagro @BonesmashFinalBoss @kazama



@lurking truecel @Volksstaffel @Darkeningstar


@Gengar sticky this:feelshehe:
 
  • +1
Reactions: jeff1234, BonesmashFinalBoss and Darkeningstar
Ass fogs
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
  • WTF
Reactions: ss07, jeff1234, choppedshyt and 3 others
Ass giga mogs. Even in the tities pics my eyes were only drawn to their hips. Only low T niggas stuck in pubescent would prefer tits
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: ss07, HundredManSlayer, jeff1234 and 1 other person
Ass giga mogs. Even in the tities pics my eyes were only drawn to their hips. Only low T niggas stuck in pubescent would prefer tits
Boobs>ass everyday, but in the end of the day it’s subjective.
 
  • +1
Reactions: jeff1234, BonesmashFinalBoss, Hernan and 1 other person
@✧YN✧ thoughts? Ik black men are the biggest ass defenders
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: jeff1234, BonesmashFinalBoss, Hernan and 1 other person
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: jeff1234, BonesmashFinalBoss and copercel123
Well i saw that yall really wanted me to make it so here we go:

Song of the thread:
Song:



The official thread of why boobs>ass

Propotions MATTER, so that means that having nice big boobs wont save your girl if her ass is nonexistent. So in this thread I’m not pointing out that boobs are the only thing that matter but that it’s just better than ass. BTW if you read all the thread you’re mentally ill.

View attachment 3823170


Evolutionary hardcoding
women are the only species where the breasts stay enlarged even when not lactating. That’s not a coincidence, it evolved specifically to grab attention. Boobs aren’t just “fat sacks,” they’re a signal. They say: “I’ve got estrogen, I can reproduce, and I’ve never had a kid yet (if they’re perky and symmetrical).”

Ass? Useful, yeah. Holds fat reserves, shows lumbar curve strength. But every human has an ass. Breasts are unique to women, making them a more exclusive visual cue. You don’t subconsciously crave a trait that both sexes can have.


Study receipts:

Desmond Morris and Owen Lovejoy argue breasts imitate buttocks to signal sexual maturity and grab attention frontally. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleavage_(breasts)


A sharp eye-tracking review confirms evolution wired us to see torso cues, especially boobs, as markers of reproductive value. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6491769/


Visual Circuitry: First Glance Wins


Within 200 ms of seeing a sexy body, the brain’s locking onto the breasts or waist—not the face, not the butt. Breasts are part of the “visual triangle” (eyes to face to cleavage); powerful layout, high arousal.

study receipts

In one eye-tracking experiment, 47 % of men looked at the breasts first, 33 % at the waist,
only 20 % at the face or lower body.

More broad work shows that first fixations land on breasts or waist within 200 ms, and the gaze sticks longer there vs. hips/legs.


Hormone Signals: Boobs Speak Biology


Big, firm, symmetrical, perky breasts = direct estrogen signposts; they also drop hints of age, parity, and fertility. The waist-to-bust ratio, bikini curves , it’s all hormonal billboard pop culture uses, but the biology’s real.

Study receipts:

Men rate medium-to-large, round, perky, non-saggy breasts with close-set nipples as most attractive, firmness and youth-over-size matter.

Colors matter: darker areolae = deeper youth/fertility cues, and men rated those more attractive.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20169468/?utm_source=Google


Asses can be built, boobs can’t

A girl’s ass can be changed, so it’s not rare to see a girl with a nice ass, but seeing a girl with nice boobs is different, especially if she’s between 14-20. They got it naturally and it’s making it rarer to see a girl with nice tits.

What would you prefer:

nice
boobs

View attachment 3823250
(Credit to @PseudoMaxxer)

View attachment 3823252
View attachment 3823256
View attachment 3823270



Nice ass

View attachment 3823265

View attachment 3823271

View attachment 3823273

Conclusion:
At the end of the day, proportions matter far more than any single feature. You can’t seriously claim a girl is attractive just because she has nice boobs if her lower half is completely lacking, same thing the other way around. A good body is about balance and symmetry.

Now, that being said, if I had to choose between the two, I’d go with boobs , and here’s why: a girl can grow her glutes over time. With consistent training, nutrition, and even some enhancements, a flat ass can turn into a bubble butt. But boobs? That’s genetic. You either got them or you don’t. And most of the time, unless surgery is involved, even then it won’t look natural. you’re not changing your cup size naturally.

So while both are important aesthetically, boobs have the upper hand because they’re harder to “build.” You can sculpt an ass, you can’t sculpt breasts. Proportions will always be king, but in terms of raw, unchangeable value, boobs win.
Bad boobs are exuding low quality, unlike ass that shows that girl isn’t a whore. Big ass=whore trait.



Yeah it’s a shitty thread but just wanted to make it clear: proportions >boobs > ass.

So… what your guys opinions? Ass or tits?


tags:
@AverageTevvezFan @Zagro @BonesmashFinalBoss @kazama



@druiglooksmaxer @Looks over NT @MoggerGaston @slaters
 
  • +1
Reactions: MoggerGaston, jeff1234 and druiglooksmaxer
Bump again ts is a good one
 
  • +1
Reactions: jeff1234 and copercel123
Dnrd
 
  • WTF
  • +1
Reactions: jeff1234 and copercel123
Well i saw that yall really wanted me to make it so here we go:

Song of the thread:
Song:



The official thread of why boobs>ass

Propotions MATTER, so that means that having nice big boobs wont save your girl if her ass is nonexistent. So in this thread I’m not pointing out that boobs are the only thing that matter but that it’s just better than ass. BTW if you read all the thread you’re mentally ill.

View attachment 3823170


Evolutionary hardcoding
women are the only species where the breasts stay enlarged even when not lactating. That’s not a coincidence, it evolved specifically to grab attention. Boobs aren’t just “fat sacks,” they’re a signal. They say: “I’ve got estrogen, I can reproduce, and I’ve never had a kid yet (if they’re perky and symmetrical).”

Ass? Useful, yeah. Holds fat reserves, shows lumbar curve strength. But every human has an ass. Breasts are unique to women, making them a more exclusive visual cue. You don’t subconsciously crave a trait that both sexes can have.


Study receipts:

Desmond Morris and Owen Lovejoy argue breasts imitate buttocks to signal sexual maturity and grab attention frontally. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleavage_(breasts)


A sharp eye-tracking review confirms evolution wired us to see torso cues, especially boobs, as markers of reproductive value. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6491769/


Visual Circuitry: First Glance Wins


Within 200 ms of seeing a sexy body, the brain’s locking onto the breasts or waist—not the face, not the butt. Breasts are part of the “visual triangle” (eyes to face to cleavage); powerful layout, high arousal.

study receipts

In one eye-tracking experiment, 47 % of men looked at the breasts first, 33 % at the waist,
only 20 % at the face or lower body.

More broad work shows that first fixations land on breasts or waist within 200 ms, and the gaze sticks longer there vs. hips/legs.


Hormone Signals: Boobs Speak Biology


Big, firm, symmetrical, perky breasts = direct estrogen signposts; they also drop hints of age, parity, and fertility. The waist-to-bust ratio, bikini curves , it’s all hormonal billboard pop culture uses, but the biology’s real.

Study receipts:

Men rate medium-to-large, round, perky, non-saggy breasts with close-set nipples as most attractive, firmness and youth-over-size matter.

Colors matter: darker areolae = deeper youth/fertility cues, and men rated those more attractive.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20169468/?utm_source=Google


Asses can be built, boobs can’t

A girl’s ass can be changed, so it’s not rare to see a girl with a nice ass, but seeing a girl with nice boobs is different, especially if she’s between 14-20. They got it naturally and it’s making it rarer to see a girl with nice tits.

What would you prefer:

nice
boobs

View attachment 3823250
(Credit to @PseudoMaxxer)

View attachment 3823252
View attachment 3823256
View attachment 3823270



Nice ass

View attachment 3823265

View attachment 3823271

View attachment 3823273

Conclusion:
At the end of the day, proportions matter far more than any single feature. You can’t seriously claim a girl is attractive just because she has nice boobs if her lower half is completely lacking, same thing the other way around. A good body is about balance and symmetry.

Now, that being said, if I had to choose between the two, I’d go with boobs , and here’s why: a girl can grow her glutes over time. With consistent training, nutrition, and even some enhancements, a flat ass can turn into a bubble butt. But boobs? That’s genetic. You either got them or you don’t. And most of the time, unless surgery is involved, even then it won’t look natural. you’re not changing your cup size naturally.

So while both are important aesthetically, boobs have the upper hand because they’re harder to “build.” You can sculpt an ass, you can’t sculpt breasts. Proportions will always be king, but in terms of raw, unchangeable value, boobs win.
Bad boobs are exuding low quality, unlike ass that shows that girl isn’t a whore. Big ass=whore trait.



Yeah it’s a shitty thread but just wanted to make it clear: proportions >boobs > ass.

So… what your guys opinions? Ass or tits?


tags:
@AverageTevvezFan @Zagro @BonesmashFinalBoss @kazama



d > p
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: jeff1234 and copercel123
Well i saw that yall really wanted me to make it so here we go:

Song of the thread:
Song:



The official thread of why boobs>ass

Propotions MATTER, so that means that having nice big boobs wont save your girl if her ass is nonexistent. So in this thread I’m not pointing out that boobs are the only thing that matter but that it’s just better than ass. BTW if you read all the thread you’re mentally ill.

View attachment 3823170


Evolutionary hardcoding
women are the only species where the breasts stay enlarged even when not lactating. That’s not a coincidence, it evolved specifically to grab attention. Boobs aren’t just “fat sacks,” they’re a signal. They say: “I’ve got estrogen, I can reproduce, and I’ve never had a kid yet (if they’re perky and symmetrical).”

Ass? Useful, yeah. Holds fat reserves, shows lumbar curve strength. But every human has an ass. Breasts are unique to women, making them a more exclusive visual cue. You don’t subconsciously crave a trait that both sexes can have.


Study receipts:

Desmond Morris and Owen Lovejoy argue breasts imitate buttocks to signal sexual maturity and grab attention frontally. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleavage_(breasts)


A sharp eye-tracking review confirms evolution wired us to see torso cues, especially boobs, as markers of reproductive value. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6491769/


Visual Circuitry: First Glance Wins


Within 200 ms of seeing a sexy body, the brain’s locking onto the breasts or waist—not the face, not the butt. Breasts are part of the “visual triangle” (eyes to face to cleavage); powerful layout, high arousal.

study receipts

In one eye-tracking experiment, 47 % of men looked at the breasts first, 33 % at the waist,
only 20 % at the face or lower body.

More broad work shows that first fixations land on breasts or waist within 200 ms, and the gaze sticks longer there vs. hips/legs.


Hormone Signals: Boobs Speak Biology


Big, firm, symmetrical, perky breasts = direct estrogen signposts; they also drop hints of age, parity, and fertility. The waist-to-bust ratio, bikini curves , it’s all hormonal billboard pop culture uses, but the biology’s real.

Study receipts:

Men rate medium-to-large, round, perky, non-saggy breasts with close-set nipples as most attractive, firmness and youth-over-size matter.

Colors matter: darker areolae = deeper youth/fertility cues, and men rated those more attractive.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20169468/?utm_source=Google


Asses can be built, boobs can’t

A girl’s ass can be changed, so it’s not rare to see a girl with a nice ass, but seeing a girl with nice boobs is different, especially if she’s between 14-20. They got it naturally and it’s making it rarer to see a girl with nice tits.

What would you prefer:

nice
boobs

View attachment 3823250
(Credit to @PseudoMaxxer)

View attachment 3823252
View attachment 3823256
View attachment 3823270



Nice ass

View attachment 3823265

View attachment 3823271

View attachment 3823273

Conclusion:
At the end of the day, proportions matter far more than any single feature. You can’t seriously claim a girl is attractive just because she has nice boobs if her lower half is completely lacking, same thing the other way around. A good body is about balance and symmetry.

Now, that being said, if I had to choose between the two, I’d go with boobs , and here’s why: a girl can grow her glutes over time. With consistent training, nutrition, and even some enhancements, a flat ass can turn into a bubble butt. But boobs? That’s genetic. You either got them or you don’t. And most of the time, unless surgery is involved, even then it won’t look natural. you’re not changing your cup size naturally.

So while both are important aesthetically, boobs have the upper hand because they’re harder to “build.” You can sculpt an ass, you can’t sculpt breasts. Proportions will always be king, but in terms of raw, unchangeable value, boobs win.
Bad boobs are exuding low quality, unlike ass that shows that girl isn’t a whore. Big ass=whore trait.



Yeah it’s a shitty thread but just wanted to make it clear: proportions >boobs > ass.

So… what your guys opinions? Ass or tits?


tags:
@AverageTevvezFan @Zagro @BonesmashFinalBoss @kazama



great thread. but DNR.

i personally prefer ass, @kazama what about you
 
  • +1
Reactions: kazama
Lowkey the ass should be decently small and good shaped and the boobs a little bigger than average, thats my ideal atleast:Comfy:
 
  • +1
Reactions: copercel123
Lowkey the ass should be decently small and good shaped and the boobs a little bigger than average, thats my ideal atleast:Comfy:
Exactly.
 
  • +1
Reactions: kazama and Leo Psl
Well i saw that yall really wanted me to make it so here we go:

Song of the thread:
Song:



The official thread of why boobs>ass

Propotions MATTER, so that means that having nice big boobs wont save your girl if her ass is nonexistent. So in this thread I’m not pointing out that boobs are the only thing that matter but that it’s just better than ass. BTW if you read all the thread you’re mentally ill.

View attachment 3823170


Evolutionary hardcoding
women are the only species where the breasts stay enlarged even when not lactating. That’s not a coincidence, it evolved specifically to grab attention. Boobs aren’t just “fat sacks,” they’re a signal. They say: “I’ve got estrogen, I can reproduce, and I’ve never had a kid yet (if they’re perky and symmetrical).”

Ass? Useful, yeah. Holds fat reserves, shows lumbar curve strength. But every human has an ass. Breasts are unique to women, making them a more exclusive visual cue. You don’t subconsciously crave a trait that both sexes can have.


Study receipts:

Desmond Morris and Owen Lovejoy argue breasts imitate buttocks to signal sexual maturity and grab attention frontally. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleavage_(breasts)


A sharp eye-tracking review confirms evolution wired us to see torso cues, especially boobs, as markers of reproductive value. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6491769/


Visual Circuitry: First Glance Wins


Within 200 ms of seeing a sexy body, the brain’s locking onto the breasts or waist—not the face, not the butt. Breasts are part of the “visual triangle” (eyes to face to cleavage); powerful layout, high arousal.

study receipts

In one eye-tracking experiment, 47 % of men looked at the breasts first, 33 % at the waist,
only 20 % at the face or lower body.

More broad work shows that first fixations land on breasts or waist within 200 ms, and the gaze sticks longer there vs. hips/legs.


Hormone Signals: Boobs Speak Biology


Big, firm, symmetrical, perky breasts = direct estrogen signposts; they also drop hints of age, parity, and fertility. The waist-to-bust ratio, bikini curves , it’s all hormonal billboard pop culture uses, but the biology’s real.

Study receipts:

Men rate medium-to-large, round, perky, non-saggy breasts with close-set nipples as most attractive, firmness and youth-over-size matter.

Colors matter: darker areolae = deeper youth/fertility cues, and men rated those more attractive.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20169468/?utm_source=Google


Asses can be built, boobs can’t

A girl’s ass can be changed, so it’s not rare to see a girl with a nice ass, but seeing a girl with nice boobs is different, especially if she’s between 14-20. They got it naturally and it’s making it rarer to see a girl with nice tits.

What would you prefer:

nice
boobs

View attachment 3823250
(Credit to @PseudoMaxxer)

View attachment 3823252
View attachment 3823256
View attachment 3823270



Nice ass

View attachment 3823265

View attachment 3823271

View attachment 3823273

Conclusion:
At the end of the day, proportions matter far more than any single feature. You can’t seriously claim a girl is attractive just because she has nice boobs if her lower half is completely lacking, same thing the other way around. A good body is about balance and symmetry.

Now, that being said, if I had to choose between the two, I’d go with boobs , and here’s why: a girl can grow her glutes over time. With consistent training, nutrition, and even some enhancements, a flat ass can turn into a bubble butt. But boobs? That’s genetic. You either got them or you don’t. And most of the time, unless surgery is involved, even then it won’t look natural. you’re not changing your cup size naturally.

So while both are important aesthetically, boobs have the upper hand because they’re harder to “build.” You can sculpt an ass, you can’t sculpt breasts. Proportions will always be king, but in terms of raw, unchangeable value, boobs win.
Bad boobs are exuding low quality, unlike ass that shows that girl isn’t a whore. Big ass=whore trait.



Yeah it’s a shitty thread but just wanted to make it clear: proportions >boobs > ass.

So… what your guys opinions? Ass or tits?


tags:
@AverageTevvezFan @Zagro @BonesmashFinalBoss @kazama




@KeepCopingLads @Chimera @spongebob @autistic_tendencies
thank you for tagging me
yes i read every word and spitting facts, my low iq low t classmates prefer ass
 
  • +1
Reactions: copercel123
Well i saw that yall really wanted me to make it so here we go:

Song of the thread:
Song:



The official thread of why boobs>ass

Propotions MATTER, so that means that having nice big boobs wont save your girl if her ass is nonexistent. So in this thread I’m not pointing out that boobs are the only thing that matter but that it’s just better than ass. BTW if you read all the thread you’re mentally ill.

View attachment 3823170


Evolutionary hardcoding
women are the only species where the breasts stay enlarged even when not lactating. That’s not a coincidence, it evolved specifically to grab attention. Boobs aren’t just “fat sacks,” they’re a signal. They say: “I’ve got estrogen, I can reproduce, and I’ve never had a kid yet (if they’re perky and symmetrical).”

Ass? Useful, yeah. Holds fat reserves, shows lumbar curve strength. But every human has an ass. Breasts are unique to women, making them a more exclusive visual cue. You don’t subconsciously crave a trait that both sexes can have.


Study receipts:

Desmond Morris and Owen Lovejoy argue breasts imitate buttocks to signal sexual maturity and grab attention frontally. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleavage_(breasts)


A sharp eye-tracking review confirms evolution wired us to see torso cues, especially boobs, as markers of reproductive value. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6491769/


Visual Circuitry: First Glance Wins


Within 200 ms of seeing a sexy body, the brain’s locking onto the breasts or waist—not the face, not the butt. Breasts are part of the “visual triangle” (eyes to face to cleavage); powerful layout, high arousal.

study receipts

In one eye-tracking experiment, 47 % of men looked at the breasts first, 33 % at the waist,
only 20 % at the face or lower body.

More broad work shows that first fixations land on breasts or waist within 200 ms, and the gaze sticks longer there vs. hips/legs.


Hormone Signals: Boobs Speak Biology


Big, firm, symmetrical, perky breasts = direct estrogen signposts; they also drop hints of age, parity, and fertility. The waist-to-bust ratio, bikini curves , it’s all hormonal billboard pop culture uses, but the biology’s real.

Study receipts:

Men rate medium-to-large, round, perky, non-saggy breasts with close-set nipples as most attractive, firmness and youth-over-size matter.

Colors matter: darker areolae = deeper youth/fertility cues, and men rated those more attractive.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20169468/?utm_source=Google


Asses can be built, boobs can’t

A girl’s ass can be changed, so it’s not rare to see a girl with a nice ass, but seeing a girl with nice boobs is different, especially if she’s between 14-20. They got it naturally and it’s making it rarer to see a girl with nice tits.

What would you prefer:

nice
boobs

View attachment 3823250
(Credit to @PseudoMaxxer)

View attachment 3823252
View attachment 3823256
View attachment 3823270



Nice ass

View attachment 3823265

View attachment 3823271

View attachment 3823273

Conclusion:
At the end of the day, proportions matter far more than any single feature. You can’t seriously claim a girl is attractive just because she has nice boobs if her lower half is completely lacking, same thing the other way around. A good body is about balance and symmetry.

Now, that being said, if I had to choose between the two, I’d go with boobs , and here’s why: a girl can grow her glutes over time. With consistent training, nutrition, and even some enhancements, a flat ass can turn into a bubble butt. But boobs? That’s genetic. You either got them or you don’t. And most of the time, unless surgery is involved, even then it won’t look natural. you’re not changing your cup size naturally.

So while both are important aesthetically, boobs have the upper hand because they’re harder to “build.” You can sculpt an ass, you can’t sculpt breasts. Proportions will always be king, but in terms of raw, unchangeable value, boobs win.
Bad boobs are exuding low quality, unlike ass that shows that girl isn’t a whore. Big ass=whore trait.



Yeah it’s a shitty thread but just wanted to make it clear: proportions >boobs > ass.

So… what your guys opinions? Ass or tits?


tags:
@AverageTevvezFan @Zagro @BonesmashFinalBoss @kazama



Bump 😡
 
  • +1
Reactions: kazama
Well i saw that yall really wanted me to make it so here we go:

Song of the thread:
Song:



The official thread of why boobs>ass

Propotions MATTER, so that means that having nice big boobs wont save your girl if her ass is nonexistent. So in this thread I’m not pointing out that boobs are the only thing that matter but that it’s just better than ass. BTW if you read all the thread you’re mentally ill.

View attachment 3823170


Evolutionary hardcoding
women are the only species where the breasts stay enlarged even when not lactating. That’s not a coincidence, it evolved specifically to grab attention. Boobs aren’t just “fat sacks,” they’re a signal. They say: “I’ve got estrogen, I can reproduce, and I’ve never had a kid yet (if they’re perky and symmetrical).”

Ass? Useful, yeah. Holds fat reserves, shows lumbar curve strength. But every human has an ass. Breasts are unique to women, making them a more exclusive visual cue. You don’t subconsciously crave a trait that both sexes can have.


Study receipts:

Desmond Morris and Owen Lovejoy argue breasts imitate buttocks to signal sexual maturity and grab attention frontally. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleavage_(breasts)


A sharp eye-tracking review confirms evolution wired us to see torso cues, especially boobs, as markers of reproductive value. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6491769/


Visual Circuitry: First Glance Wins


Within 200 ms of seeing a sexy body, the brain’s locking onto the breasts or waist—not the face, not the butt. Breasts are part of the “visual triangle” (eyes to face to cleavage); powerful layout, high arousal.

study receipts

In one eye-tracking experiment, 47 % of men looked at the breasts first, 33 % at the waist,
only 20 % at the face or lower body.

More broad work shows that first fixations land on breasts or waist within 200 ms, and the gaze sticks longer there vs. hips/legs.


Hormone Signals: Boobs Speak Biology


Big, firm, symmetrical, perky breasts = direct estrogen signposts; they also drop hints of age, parity, and fertility. The waist-to-bust ratio, bikini curves , it’s all hormonal billboard pop culture uses, but the biology’s real.

Study receipts:

Men rate medium-to-large, round, perky, non-saggy breasts with close-set nipples as most attractive, firmness and youth-over-size matter.

Colors matter: darker areolae = deeper youth/fertility cues, and men rated those more attractive.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20169468/?utm_source=Google


Asses can be built, boobs can’t

A girl’s ass can be changed, so it’s not rare to see a girl with a nice ass, but seeing a girl with nice boobs is different, especially if she’s between 14-20. They got it naturally and it’s making it rarer to see a girl with nice tits.

What would you prefer:

nice
boobs

View attachment 3823250
(Credit to @PseudoMaxxer)

View attachment 3823252
View attachment 3823256
View attachment 3823270



Nice ass

View attachment 3823265

View attachment 3823271

View attachment 3823273

Conclusion:
At the end of the day, proportions matter far more than any single feature. You can’t seriously claim a girl is attractive just because she has nice boobs if her lower half is completely lacking, same thing the other way around. A good body is about balance and symmetry.

Now, that being said, if I had to choose between the two, I’d go with boobs , and here’s why: a girl can grow her glutes over time. With consistent training, nutrition, and even some enhancements, a flat ass can turn into a bubble butt. But boobs? That’s genetic. You either got them or you don’t. And most of the time, unless surgery is involved, even then it won’t look natural. you’re not changing your cup size naturally.

So while both are important aesthetically, boobs have the upper hand because they’re harder to “build.” You can sculpt an ass, you can’t sculpt breasts. Proportions will always be king, but in terms of raw, unchangeable value, boobs win.
Bad boobs are exuding low quality, unlike ass that shows that girl isn’t a whore. Big ass=whore trait.



Yeah it’s a shitty thread but just wanted to make it clear: proportions >boobs > ass.

So… what your guys opinions? Ass or tits?


tags:
@AverageTevvezFan @Zagro @BonesmashFinalBoss @kazama



Bump bruh, I worked hard on that shit.
@menas rep all of the comments in this thread now with your magic.
 
  • +1
Reactions: kazama
Why is this even a comparison? Why not both? both are visually pleasing
 
  • +1
Reactions: Iraniancel and autistic_tendencies
Dnr flat girl with massive ass fogs
 
  • +1
Reactions: Iraniancel and HundredManSlayer

Similar threads

copercel123
Replies
99
Views
786
karmacita901
karmacita901
Cats
Replies
138
Views
3K
Mr.Proper
Mr.Proper
Kirby9784
Replies
19
Views
800
xnj
xnj
got.daim
Replies
47
Views
2K
messi1
messi1

Users who are viewing this thread

  • slaters
  • copercel123
  • jaco
Back
Top