slaters
Luminary
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2025
- Posts
- 6,917
- Reputation
- 8,325
Well i saw that yall really wanted me to make it so here we go:
Song of the thread:
Song:
The official thread of why boobs>ass
Propotions MATTER, so that means that having nice big boobs wont save your girl if her ass is nonexistent. So in this thread I’m not pointing out that boobs are the only thing that matter but that it’s just better than ass. BTW if you read all the thread you’re mentally ill.
View attachment 3823170
Evolutionary hardcoding
women are the only species where the breasts stay enlarged even when not lactating. That’s not a coincidence, it evolved specifically to grab attention. Boobs aren’t just “fat sacks,” they’re a signal. They say: “I’ve got estrogen, I can reproduce, and I’ve never had a kid yet (if they’re perky and symmetrical).”
Ass? Useful, yeah. Holds fat reserves, shows lumbar curve strength. But every human has an ass. Breasts are unique to women, making them a more exclusive visual cue. You don’t subconsciously crave a trait that both sexes can have.
Study receipts:
Desmond Morris and Owen Lovejoy argue breasts imitate buttocks to signal sexual maturity and grab attention frontally. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleavage_(breasts)
A sharp eye-tracking review confirms evolution wired us to see torso cues, especially boobs, as markers of reproductive value. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6491769/
Visual Circuitry: First Glance Wins
Within 200 ms of seeing a sexy body, the brain’s locking onto the breasts or waist—not the face, not the butt. Breasts are part of the “visual triangle” (eyes to face to cleavage); powerful layout, high arousal.
study receipts
In one eye-tracking experiment, 47 % of men looked at the breasts first, 33 % at the waist,
only 20 % at the face or lower body.
Eye-tracking of men's preferences for waist-to-hip ratio and breast size of women - PubMed
Studies of human physical traits and mate preferences often use questionnaires asking participants to rate the attractiveness of images. Female waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), breast size, and facial appearance have all been implicated in assessments by men of female attractiveness. However, very...pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
More broad work shows that first fixations land on breasts or waist within 200 ms, and the gaze sticks longer there vs. hips/legs.
An Eye Tracking Examination of Men’s Attractiveness by Conceptive Risk Women - PMC
Previous research has indicated that women prefer men who exhibit an android physical appearance where fat distribution is deposited on the upper body (i.e., shoulders and arms) and abdomen. This ideal physical shape has been associated with ...pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Hormone Signals: Boobs Speak Biology
Big, firm, symmetrical, perky breasts = direct estrogen signposts; they also drop hints of age, parity, and fertility. The waist-to-bust ratio, bikini curves , it’s all hormonal billboard pop culture uses, but the biology’s real.
Study receipts:
Men rate medium-to-large, round, perky, non-saggy breasts with close-set nipples as most attractive, firmness and youth-over-size matter.
Waist–hip ratio - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Colors matter: darker areolae = deeper youth/fertility cues, and men rated those more attractive.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20169468/?utm_source=Google
Asses can be built, boobs can’t
A girl’s ass can be changed, so it’s not rare to see a girl with a nice ass, but seeing a girl with nice boobs is different, especially if she’s between 14-20. They got it naturally and it’s making it rarer to see a girl with nice tits.
What would you prefer:
nice boobs
View attachment 3823250
(Credit to @PseudoMaxxer)
View attachment 3823252
View attachment 3823256
View attachment 3823270
Nice ass
View attachment 3823265
View attachment 3823271
View attachment 3823273
Conclusion:
At the end of the day, proportions matter far more than any single feature. You can’t seriously claim a girl is attractive just because she has nice boobs if her lower half is completely lacking, same thing the other way around. A good body is about balance and symmetry.
Now, that being said, if I had to choose between the two, I’d go with boobs , and here’s why: a girl can grow her glutes over time. With consistent training, nutrition, and even some enhancements, a flat ass can turn into a bubble butt. But boobs? That’s genetic. You either got them or you don’t. And most of the time, unless surgery is involved, even then it won’t look natural. you’re not changing your cup size naturally.
So while both are important aesthetically, boobs have the upper hand because they’re harder to “build.” You can sculpt an ass, you can’t sculpt breasts. Proportions will always be king, but in terms of raw, unchangeable value, boobs win.
Bad boobs are exuding low quality, unlike ass that shows that girl isn’t a whore. Big ass=whore trait.
Yeah it’s a shitty thread but just wanted to make it clear: proportions >boobs > ass.
So… what your guys opinions? Ass or tits?
tags:
@AverageTevvezFan @Zagro @BonesmashFinalBoss @kazama
Yeah
