The pacifier fetish shit: my view

[WonkyChin186]

It's extremely random and I don't see the appeal at all

I personally prefer girls who are 10+yrs older and extremely tall

the pictures people like @ICXCLuvr are showing aren't even cute or making them seem more innocent

I don't think it's pedoish or noncy since the girls still don't look anything like kids and it doesn't make them look any younger too, i assume the goal is just to make them seem innocent even if I don't see it well

just "strange" to me

whatchu guys think

 

[ICXCLuvr]

I personally prefer girls who are 10+yrs older

 

[ICXCLuvr]

Wym

 

[ØUROBOROS]

It's extremely random and I don't see the appeal at all

I personally prefer girls who are 10+yrs older and extremely tall

the pictures people like @ICXCLuvr are showing aren't even cute or making them seem more innocent

I don't think it's pedoish or noncy since the girls still don't look anything like kids and it doesn't make them look any younger too, i assume the goal is just to make them seem innocent even if I don't see it well

just "strange" to me

whatchu guys think

I agree with this it is just a weird fetishe I wouldn't say it is pedophilia like some niggas are saying for me if I found a girl attractive when she wasn't wearing a pacifier I will still find her attractive after wearing a pacifier.

 

[WonkyChin186]

View attachment 5550188

whatchu prefer

 

[ICXCLuvr]

whatchu prefer

My age so 15+

 

[g4rlic]

its ragebait and its also a form of degredation

 

[WonkyChin186]

its ragebait and its also a form of degredation

it doesn't seem like ragebait

 

[selqa]

He's good at baiting. He labels every women higly praised in this community as "ugly" knowing people will get annoyed and engage with the thread, and about the pacifier part that is a little strange too, I think he's just tryna trigger people with that too.

 

[WonkyChin186]

He's good at baiting. He labels every women higly praised in this community as "ugly" knowing people will get annoyed and engage with the thread, and about the pacifier part that is a little strange too, I think he's just tryna trigger people with that too.

there's lots agreeing with it tho

 

[ØUROBOROS]

He's good at baiting. He labels every women higly praised in this community as "ugly" knowing people will get annoyed and engage with the thread, and about the pacifier part that is a little strange too, I think he's just tryna trigger people with that too.

Yeah he is just a troll it starts out serious but then he starts trolling that happened with both the pacifier shit and calling attractive women ugly shit it both started out serious.

 

[selqa]

there's lots agreeing with it tho

In some, yeah. He exaggerates it too much though.

I mean some of his threads are obvious bait, like the sophie rain ones.

 

[Jason5000]

my view is that if i were in charge i would line them up against a wall and shoot them

 

[WonkyChin186]

In some, yeah. He exaggerates it too much though.

I mean some of his threads are obvious bait, like the sophie rain ones.

they seem legit

he has a good point, it was just incorrect

 

[WonkyChin186]

my view is that if i were in charge i would line them up against a wall and shoot them

sorry ard

 

[g4rlic]

it doesn't seem like ragebait

why not.

 

[selqa]

they seem legit

So, you consider sophie rain being labelled as "stacy" legit?