The Perfect Response to the "Muh Studies" argument put forward by users such as @Predeterminism

D

Deleted member 2382

.
Joined
Jul 12, 2019
Posts
10,998
Reputation
30,052
 
  • +1
  • Woah
  • JFL
Reactions: TotalFrontier, infini, BigBallsLarry and 1 other person
IMG 7277

Found this on here today, also forgot who shared it, golden image though.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: JasGews69x, FutureExoticChad, browncurrycel and 5 others
  • +1
Reactions: browncurrycel, BigBallsLarry and BeanCelll
Stats at the end of the day are numbers and don't really dictate what you see irl. They are not reality itself but structured approximations of it. Irl there are too many variables to take into account if stats were that bullet proof. All quant traders would have become billionaires
 
  • +1
Reactions: FutureExoticChad, browncurrycel, BigBallsLarry and 1 other person
Not sure who posted it today but I've using this one for a long time, it's an amazing response
me too, i first got it from @valency 2.0.
 
  • +1
Reactions: psychopathic
Wasn't the OkCupid study one of the very few published that proved not to agree with its providers' findings?
 

Similar threads

Nodal
Replies
69
Views
281
Alexg_lover
Alexg_lover
theblueprints
Replies
5
Views
30
filthycurrycel
filthycurrycel
Anakin.
Replies
68
Views
385
Mr. Squarepants
Mr. Squarepants
tumz123
Replies
2
Views
47
Densen
Densen
_MVP_
Replies
3
Views
54
horseman.
horseman.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top