The philosopher u like is not up to their reasoning abilities and whatnot

[alurmo]

liek for me even if kant or descarte could give the sharpest reasoning on whatever topic i would still choose a philosopher like nietzsche or jung over them
bc its down to the fact that kant or descarte or philosophers like them dont provide me with enough stimuli to feel satisfied, after every read of them i feel empty, i dont get a prefferable answer or a preferable conclusion

 

[оrg]

liek for me even if kant or descarte could give the sharpest reasoning on whatever topic i would still choose a philosopher like nietzsche or jung over them
bc its down to the fact that kant or descarte or philosophers like them dont provide me with enough stimuli to feel satisfied, after every read of them i feel empty, i dont get a prefferable answer or a preferable conclusion

who do you like

 

[alurmo]

who do you like

specifically nietzsche and jungian philosophy, i dont prefer the idea of god, prob bc my physiological history with the topic and the satiety of the bible not giving enough answers to "truth"
along iwth that, i just hate over rationalized systems of philosophy, too dogmatic and robot like, almost like boxes that are human made

 

[Jenson]

specifically nietzsche and jungian philosophy, i dont prefer the idea of god, prob bc my physiological history with the topic and the satiety of the bible not giving enough answers to "truth"
along iwth that, i just hate over rationalized systems of philosophy, too dogmatic and robot like, almost like boxes that are human made

high T valid take i like descartes too but he oversimplified human thinking

nietzsche and jungian are good choices schopenhauer is a good philosopher too