The philosophy is that if you become successful in this life regardless of your looks/background

[owlofathena]

Then you have a really good chance of becoming a gigachad in the next life. Let's say your Arnold Schwarzenegger who was already a gigachad in his prime well because he became tera successful he will be a gigachad in the next life probably a gigachad face mainly. What do you guys think? If your a serial killer or murdered people for no good reason like Elliott Rodger he for example will be disabled in his next life. Reincarnation

 

[owlofathena]

@Hozay you wrote something similar

 

[Deleted member 3828]

If you're an ogre in this life you must have lived in a swamp

 

[Sal]

Over for ogres

 

[Deleted member 5189]

Then you have a really good chance of becoming a gigachad in the next life. Let's say your Arnold Schwarzenegger who was already a gigachad in his prime well because he became tera successful he will be a gigachad in the next life probably a gigachad face mainly. What do you guys think? If your a serial killer or murdered people for no good reason like Elliott Rodger he for example will be disabled in his next life. Reincarnation

why would that happen. your basing this entirely on morals - which don't exist.

your morals aren't determined by your culture, religion or the law. the only laws you should be following are the laws of nature. and in nature there aren't any morals. there's no such thing as morals. they're man-made therefore they dont exist, its all in your head. by following morals you're enslaving and limiting yourself. does a lion have 'bad' morals because it killed a zebra to gain the meat and energy from it for it's own benefit? No. does a bully victim have bad morals for killing the person who bullied and traumatised them? no. and if you disagree with either of those analogies then this just proves that morals don't exist; how can morals exist if morals can be subjective?

why would nature ever care to punish someone. there's no such thing as karma.

 

[owlofathena]

why would that happen. your basing this entirely on morals - which don't exist.

your morals aren't determined by your culture, religion or the law. the only laws you should be following are the laws of nature. and in nature there aren't any morals. there's no such thing as morals. they're man-made therefore they dont exist, its all in your head. by following morals you're enslaving and limiting yourself. does a lion have 'bad' morals because it killed a zebra to gain the meat and energy from it for it's own benefit? No. does a bully victim have bad morals for killing the person who bullied and traumatised them? no. and if you disagree with either of those analogies then this just proves that morals don't exist; how can morals exist if morals can be subjective?

why would nature ever care to punish someone. there's no such thing as karma.

If morals didn't exist we would be constantly fighting or at war with one another

 

[Eduardo DOV]

why would that happen. your basing this entirely on morals - which don't exist.

your morals aren't determined by your culture, religion or the law. the only laws you should be following are the laws of nature. and in nature there aren't any morals. there's no such thing as morals. they're man-made therefore they dont exist, its all in your head. by following morals you're enslaving and limiting yourself. does a lion have 'bad' morals because it killed a zebra to gain the meat and energy from it for it's own benefit? No. does a bully victim have bad morals for killing the person who bullied and traumatised them? no. and if you disagree with either of those analogies then this just proves that morals don't exist; how can morals exist if morals can be subjective?

why would nature ever care to punish someone. there's no such thing as karma.

bullshit, even rabbits have their behaviour laws with each other

 

[Deleted member 5189]

If morals didn't exist we would be constantly fighting or at war with one another

exactly. people have been brainwashed into having morals so they're easier to control. in nature everyones just happy and peaceful and loves eachother within their own tribes/families very rarely would there be a confilct between different tribes. it's not natural to live in societies. society is a network not community and if you aren't born into the right family you're a slave. if you had the choice of either living a life in a society over living in a peaceful tribe in nature then you're brainwashed and mentally ill. the only thing there is to benefit from society is the tools and technology to express creativity which aren't accessible in nature.

 

[Deleted member 5189]

bullshit, even rabbits have their behaviour laws with each other

i think you're confused by what i meant. when i say morals don't exist im not saying that that means that eveyrone hates eachother and yearns upon others suffering. of course you're going to unconditionally love your family/tribe. life is about having fun and being happy you only do what is considered 'bad' when it benefits you (which isn't bad)

im talking about people who believe in made up things like karma and how if you do something 'bad' something bad will happen to you. if someone bullies someone they're not a bad person. and what the wolf of wall street did wasn't 'bad'. he did it for his own benefit and he screwed over people and in the end lived his best possible life. and who is it that determines what's 'good' and 'bad' anyway? how can morals exist if morals are subjective. there's no such thing as good and bad in nature.

ignore the titles he makes them like that for clickbait.

 

[Eduardo DOV]

i think you're confused by what i meant. when i say morals don't exist im not saying that that means that eveyrone hates eachother and yearns upon others suffering. of course you're going to unconditionally love your family/tribe. life is about having fun and being happy you only do what is considered 'bad' when it benefits you (which isn't bad)

im talking about people who believe in made up things like karma and how if you do something 'bad' something bad will happen to you. if someone bullies someone they're not a bad person. and what the wolf of wall street did wasn't 'bad'. he did it for his own benefit and he screwed over people and in the end lived his best possible life. and who is it that determines what's 'good' and 'bad' anyway? how can morals exist if morals are subjective. there's no such thing as good and bad in nature.

ignore the titles he makes them like that for clickbait.

not reading son

 

[Deleted member 5189]

not reading son

your loss

 

[MostGLSlayer]

Basically there is no right or wrong, only actions and consequences.

 

[Deleted member 5189]

why would that happen. your basing this entirely on morals - which don't exist.

your morals aren't determined by your culture, religion or the law. the only laws you should be following are the laws of nature. and in nature there aren't any morals. there's no such thing as morals. they're man-made therefore they dont exist, its all in your head. by following morals you're enslaving and limiting yourself. does a lion have 'bad' morals because it killed a zebra to gain the meat and energy from it for it's own benefit? No. does a bully victim have bad morals for killing the person who bullied and traumatised them? no. and if you disagree with either of those analogies then this just proves that morals don't exist; how can morals exist if morals can be subjective?

why would nature ever care to punish someone. there's no such thing as karma.

 

[owlofathena]

View attachment 1202077
View attachment 1202080