The phrase 'consenting adults' kind of implies that children are able to consent.

Aladin

Aladin

Fuchsia
Joined
Jul 20, 2022
Posts
12,438
Reputation
14,493
When normies say phrases like this they implicitly concede that it is possible for children to give consent.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • WTF
Reactions: Jatt, John6Enjoyer, imontheloose and 5 others
I mean kids can be in relationship with another child plus you never just say consenting adult but adults which implies 2 or more
 
I mean kids can be in relationship with another child plus you never just say consenting adult but adults which implies 2 or more
“Homosexuality is fine as long as it’s consenting adults.”

Doesn’t this imply homosexual teenagers can consent? But it’s wrong for them to have sex?
 
Alaah praise be da sandniggers
 
  • JFL
Reactions: valency 2.0
No you're misinterpreting it, the phrase seeks to differentiate between "consenting" and "non-consenting" adults not consenting "adults" and consenting "non-adults".
 
  • +1
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD
No you're misinterpreting it, the phrase seeks to differentiate between "consenting" and "non-consenting" adults not consenting "adults" and consenting "non-adults".
There’s no need to use the word adult just use “consenting.”
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Vantablack
Children are not cognitively developed enough to seriously consent to that stuff. A child is not aware of the consequences or seriousness of their actions
 
  • +1
Reactions: Klasik616
When normies say phrases like this they implicitly concede that it is possible for children to give consent.
No its simply giving another requirement to having lawful sex consenting humans means any 2 humans consenting but the added parameter of adults further elaborate that both entities need to be consenting and over the age of 18
 
  • +1
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD
Children are not cognitively developed enough to seriously consent to that stuff. A child is not aware of the consequences or seriousness of their actions
A kid doesn't know the meaning of anything only adults do
 
  • +1
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD
It depends on the context in which consent is being used in if its in a serial context or legal setting then children are not permitted by law to consent to that stuff and also they shouldn't be able to if its not in reference to that stuff then yes just say consent but its a situational term
 
Don't post gay shit.
“Homosexuality is fine as long as it’s consenting adults.”

Doesn’t this imply homosexual teenagers can consent? But it’s wrong for them to have sex?
I consent a femboy uses my dick as a dildo sir
 
They’re trying to say that the two adults consent to one another. They’re not implying that adult is negotiable here. It is the idea of, the adults consent to one another, else it would be wrong, or the parties are children whether they consent or not, and is also wrong.
 
foids are never really able to consent. even grown women end up fucking players who break their heart. meanwhile as a young man i knew who i wanted and its never changed.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aladin and Latinolooksmaxxer
people under "age of consent" can factually consent but their consent isnt legally valid, so its considered non-existent for criminal aquitting purposes

but in setting the criminal penalty the courts take in consideration if there was a factual consent or not in most cases, like in some countries (like the USA) they differentiate between "statutory rape" when the victim is at least of a certain age (close to the age of majority) and "actual rape"
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Aladin and isis_Bleach
Op making his 100th "I should be able to fuck children :feelswhy:" thread of the year
 
  • +1
Reactions: Radio

Similar threads

SHARK
Replies
3
Views
806
badromance
badromance
BornAgainChad
Replies
6
Views
679
BornAgainChad
BornAgainChad
O
Replies
5
Views
833
KrissKross
KrissKross
disillusioned
Replies
15
Views
880
FatJattMofo
FatJattMofo
Wincel
Replies
93
Views
19K
Deleted member 17429
D

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top