The power of jaw angle implants

key

key

Iron
Joined
Feb 17, 2025
Posts
150
Reputation
234
According to this person, it was chin + jaw angles.

Before

IMG 0667


After
IMG 0668
 
  • +1
Reactions: jackinthebox, flambria, geenk worg and 3 others
i get it but the second picture is so frauded compared to the first
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: clearness., shugitar, flambria and 4 others
i get it but the second picture is so frauded compared to the first
Better lighting, better skin, fresh haircut, squintmaxxing for less scleral show, maybe lost a little weight?

But all of that would be negligible if it weren't for the implants.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Weed, flambria and ltn_looksminner
What's the frontal view like though. That's the real money shot
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: flambria, Deleted member 137749, key and 1 other person
Question is how does he look from the front?
 
  • +1
Reactions: key, zaebalsya, Cranium and 1 other person
Who is the surgeon?
Also I dont think it looks natural it kinda looks too heavy/bulky on edges. It doesnt follow the natural jawline with subtle tapering at the end. Edges should be slightly sharper and less accentuated. According to his lateral lines something nicer and more natural would be like this;
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2290.jpeg
    IMG_2290.jpeg
    175.6 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_2278.jpeg
    IMG_2278.jpeg
    111.4 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_2254.png
    IMG_2254.png
    3.2 MB · Views: 0
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: clearness., flambria, greycel and 1 other person
Who is the surgeon?
Also I dont think it looks natural it kinda looks too heavy/bulky on edges. It doesnt follow the natural jawline with subtle tapering at the end. Edges should be slightly sharper and less accentuated. According to his lateral lines something nicer and more natural would be like this;
Authism :kys:
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Weed, 0 bone mass, flambria and 2 others
Who is the surgeon?
Also I dont think it looks natural it kinda looks too heavy/bulky on edges. It doesnt follow the natural jawline with subtle tapering at the end. Edges should be slightly sharper and less accentuated. According to his lateral lines something nicer and more natural would be like this;
Giant
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Weed
Who is the surgeon?
Also I dont think it looks natural it kinda looks too heavy/bulky on edges. It doesnt follow the natural jawline with subtle tapering at the end. Edges should be slightly sharper and less accentuated. According to his lateral lines something nicer and more natural would be like this;
Surgery is an imitation of nature. But you're right, his results are un-natural because he used off the shelf silicone implants. An improvement regardless, surgeon was Julian De Silva.

Giant would've done a better job, these we're silicone

Question is how does he look from the front?
What's the frontal view like though. That's the real money shot
True, front is law. Not sure tho, only saw side.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: 0 bone mass, flambria, Xx_gloomy_bison_xX and 1 other person
Surgery is an imitation of nature. But you're right, his results are un-natural because he used off the shelf silicone implants. An improvement regardless, surgeon was Julian De Silva.


Giant would've done a better job, these we're off silicone



True, front is law. Not sure tho, only saw side.
Some cuck said giant somewhere
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: 0 bone mass, flambria, greycel and 1 other person
Who is the surgeon?
Also I dont think it looks natural it kinda looks too heavy/bulky on edges. It doesnt follow the natural jawline with subtle tapering at the end. Edges should be slightly sharper and less accentuated. According to his lateral lines something nicer and more natural would be like this;
Do you think this bulky appearance is strictly due to his masseters?
I think his jaw looks natural personally.
Maybe the issue is with the ramus and jaw definition for somebody of that jaw shape is rare. Most people who do possess it (especially the ramus), have a more acute jaw angle + flatter manidbular to floor angle

1753911717642
1753911743137


True, front is law. Not sure tho, only saw side.
Reason I ask for sides is, I feel the biggest overlooked issue that arises from jaw implants (aesthetically), is the lip width to bigonial width ratio
Bizygo to Bigonial generally allows enough room for no aesthetic defects
 
  • +1
Reactions: kana
Do you think this bulky appearance is strictly due to his masseters?
I think his jaw looks natural personally.
Maybe the issue is with the ramus and jaw definition for somebody of that jaw shape is rare. Most people who do possess it (especially the ramus), have a more acute jaw angle + flatter manidbular to floor angle

View attachment 3973164 View attachment 3973165


Reason I ask for sides is, I feel the biggest overlooked issue that arises from jaw implants (aesthetically), is the lip width to bigonial width ratio
Bizygo to Bigonial generally allows enough room for no aesthetic defects
Interesting take for sure I never thought about it from lip aspect. However you can't overlook importance of bizygo line vs bigonial line. If gonion are too flared than you look very uncanny. Look at all male models. Very few have such bloated outward projected jaw edges!


IMG 2300


This guy above has great side profile ideal philtrum with gonion edges slightly smaller than zygo edges. His gonions are gently sharp and visible yet elegant with curvature, gracefully complimenting his face.


IMG 2299


This guy above is still ok but started to linger around uncanny territory. Not a harmonious fusion of pretty boy/chad like the former guy but more masculine with a pinch of ogremaxx salt, yet still acceptable by universally recognized PSL metrics. If you look at his gonions they expand more to all sides (toward ears, toward ground and toward lateral sides), threatening the ideal face


IMG 2301
IMG 1363
IMG 1362


Now this guy above, who is certainly very good looking thanks to his harmony, lips, hair and eye, has gonions proturding like the wing tips of Boeing jet. Don't get me wrong he is undisputably handsome yet his gonions are off. Also if you look at his sides it has the similar bulky texture that the patient has.

All in all jaw implants shouldnt be just like lego that increases the bone but rather should be like a subtle coating that gently accentuates the existing jaw for natural and attractive results. Critical Insight; Distance between bottom of ear and gonion tip shouldnt be too far or too close!

I am adding more interetsing and inspring pics from my meticulously curated chad library for further scrutiny for the interested users!
IMG 2303
IMG 2302

IMG 1938


Unfortunately lazy, money hungry and poorly skilled plastic surgeons are not providing ideal services. They are terrified of innovation or thinking outside box. They are paralyzed by thinking "what if I try something new and one in a billion complication happens and I am litigated for malpractice". 😞
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2290.jpeg
    IMG_2290.jpeg
    175.6 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: key, flambria and tweaqo
Do you think this bulky appearance is strictly due to his masseters?
I think his jaw looks natural personally.
Maybe the issue is with the ramus and jaw definition for somebody of that jaw shape is rare. Most people who do possess it (especially the ramus), have a more acute jaw angle + flatter manidbular to floor angle

View attachment 3973164 View attachment 3973165


Reason I ask for sides is, I feel the biggest overlooked issue that arises from jaw implants (aesthetically), is the lip width to bigonial width ratio
Bizygo to Bigonial generally allows enough room for no aesthetic defects
I mean the only reason ehy this dude looks off is his lips, typical filler look
 
  • +1
Reactions: greycel
Def not, most jaw angles make you look bloated from front, thats why it usually sucks
Do you know if it can happen even with good design and just adding volume as low as possible? What scares me the most are masseter issues tbh , just on this forum i could find like 10 users that had this issue lol
 
  • +1
Reactions: lurking truecel
Do you know if it can happen even with good design and just adding volume as low as possible? What scares me the most are masseter issues tbh , just on this forum i could find like 10 users that had this issue lol
Its more to it then just masseter, but thats a huge problem. But its also how the skin Redrapes in a worse way for some people creating more jowl like appearence. Much of this procedures needs to be accompanied by other soft tissue procedures. But it becomes expensive real fast and big chance of it looking to much
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 137749
Do you know if it can happen even with good design and just adding volume as low as possible? What scares me the most are masseter issues tbh , just on this forum i could find like 10 users that had this issue lol
What do you mean by massetar issues like bloated look given by massetars? There are botox options which may or may not help or massetar reduction surgeries. Interestingly slightly visible but not bloated massetars give masculine attractive look in most men, assuming that it won't look plumpy
 
Its more to it then just masseter, but thats a huge problem. But its also how the skin Redrapes in a worse way for some people creating more jowl like appearence. Much of this procedures needs to be accompanied by other soft tissue procedures. But it becomes expensive real fast and big chance of it looking to much
ur making me overthink the idea of getting them:what:
 
ur making me overthink the idea of getting them:what:
If you have even slightly decent jaw in width etc, i wouldnt do it. But if you have a trash jaw it cant really get worse, so it can be a good option
 
If you have even slightly decent jaw in width etc, i wouldnt do it. But if you have a trash jaw it cant really get worse, so it can be a good option
realistically i really dont need them. would conservative implants improve? id say yeah
 
Do you think this bulky appearance is strictly due to his masseters?
I think his jaw looks natural personally.
Maybe the issue is with the ramus and jaw definition for somebody of that jaw shape is rare. Most people who do possess it (especially the ramus), have a more acute jaw angle + flatter manidbular to floor angle

View attachment 3973164 View attachment 3973165


Reason I ask for sides is, I feel the biggest overlooked issue that arises from jaw implants (aesthetically), is the lip width to bigonial width ratio
Bizygo to Bigonial generally allows enough room for no aesthetic defects
Robert Pattinson or whatever his name is has very large masseters, noted lack of "hollowness" from his side profile, and the overly square appearance of the ramus, compared to the surgery patient on the left. The only noticeable difference between these two is their masseter muscle size. I can confirm this claim ... As post masseter botox, my side profile went from being very boxy and more noticeably (the ramus being nearly parallel to my chin) to giving a more slender and hollow appearance.
 
  • +1
Reactions: greycel and flambria
What do you mean by massetar issues like bloated look given by massetars? There are botox options which may or may not help or massetar reduction surgeries. Interestingly slightly visible but not bloated massetars give masculine attractive look in most men, assuming that it won't look plumpy
Dehiscence , i'm considering them for mainly taller ramus and that's where you'll most likely get it. I'll get fillers and call it a day idc if they will bloat tbh still higher roi than implants considering all the risks. But ye in an ideal world implants mog.
 
Def not, most jaw angles make you look bloated from front, thats why it usually sucks
Isn't it the opposite? I'm pretty sure jaw wraparounds tend to have that effect more than angles. My jaw angle looks great from side prof but front prof I have a narrowish jaw due to wide zygos so I've been planning for jaw angles to widen the gonions a bit
 
realistically i really dont need them. would conservative implants improve? id say yeah
1753941937231

I mean this pic shows why its bad, you obv need to either detach the muscle and try to reattach it to the implant, which just doesnt look good and makes it more bulky, or you simply place it over and tear the muscle apart. Jaw angles was allways a bad idea untill the day we find some way to make the muscle reattachment better.

Image 5


A clearer pic of the muscle, obv placing a implant there will screw up with hiw the muscle look
 
Dehiscence , i'm considering them for mainly taller ramus and that's where you'll most likely get it. I'll get fillers and call it a day idc if they will bloat tbh still higher roi than implants considering all the risks. But ye in an ideal world implants mog.
What about parotid glands? They may also need to be checked
 

Similar threads

J
Replies
3
Views
76
coolman985
coolman985
sylph_
Replies
15
Views
544
samz
samz
C
Replies
1
Views
31
NuclearGeo20
NuclearGeo20
noseslayer
Replies
19
Views
524
fifi.mogy
fifi.mogy
kingofkings
Replies
28
Views
1K
BM7
BM7

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top