Hightwolf
HTW#6700
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2020
- Posts
- 2,203
- Reputation
- 4,106
I see a lot of people present this false dichotomy about jaw area vs eye area. Some say jaw is more important, some say eyes are more important, but I think most say they are about equal. There's a big problem when people talk about this. Like say you believe jaw is law, the issue is at what point in looksmaxxing your eye area does your jaw become the worse aspect of your face?
A few examples.
This guy is always brought up, he has a top tier jaw and shit tier eyes. For him obviously improving his eye area is critical. The biggest possible psl increase he could gain is through improving his eye area.
Now look at this dude. He's fat so automatically jaw is shit tier, but he has nice long blue eyes and thick eyebrows. For him nothing he does for his eyes could ever improve his psl as much as anything he could do to his jaw.
But these two are extreme examples, let's look at people who have relatively equal jaw and eye areas.
I would consider this guy average looking. For any flaws he has in either his jaw (round, narrow) or his eyes (eyebags, patchy eyebrows) he has halos (tall chin, no scleral show, blue eyes.)
These are two morphs. Morph 1 is where I only improved the eye area, while Morph 2 is where I only improved the jaw / chin.
Now maybe you would rate them differently, but I feel like both see about an equal improvement in looks from the original picture. I'm not saying jaw and eyes are equal, but that for this specific dude they are.
I feel like overall jaw is a more common weakness than eye are, so for most people jaw is what they should focus on more.
Also before someone says that Rami being more attractive than James Corden is proof that jaw > eye area, they are completely different people I was only using them to introduce the main idea.
Another thing: Above average jaw + above average eye area >>> top tier jaw + shit tier eye area OR shit tier jaw + top tier eye area.
Basically what I'm arguing is that there isn't such a thing as for which feature is better than the other, what you should worry about the most is which feature YOU need to improve the most.
A few examples.
This guy is always brought up, he has a top tier jaw and shit tier eyes. For him obviously improving his eye area is critical. The biggest possible psl increase he could gain is through improving his eye area.
Now look at this dude. He's fat so automatically jaw is shit tier, but he has nice long blue eyes and thick eyebrows. For him nothing he does for his eyes could ever improve his psl as much as anything he could do to his jaw.
But these two are extreme examples, let's look at people who have relatively equal jaw and eye areas.
I would consider this guy average looking. For any flaws he has in either his jaw (round, narrow) or his eyes (eyebags, patchy eyebrows) he has halos (tall chin, no scleral show, blue eyes.)
These are two morphs. Morph 1 is where I only improved the eye area, while Morph 2 is where I only improved the jaw / chin.
Now maybe you would rate them differently, but I feel like both see about an equal improvement in looks from the original picture. I'm not saying jaw and eyes are equal, but that for this specific dude they are.
I feel like overall jaw is a more common weakness than eye are, so for most people jaw is what they should focus on more.
Also before someone says that Rami being more attractive than James Corden is proof that jaw > eye area, they are completely different people I was only using them to introduce the main idea.
Another thing: Above average jaw + above average eye area >>> top tier jaw + shit tier eye area OR shit tier jaw + top tier eye area.
Basically what I'm arguing is that there isn't such a thing as for which feature is better than the other, what you should worry about the most is which feature YOU need to improve the most.
)))
