Deleted member 15827
Will be back
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2021
- Posts
- 19,747
- Reputation
- 24,349
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Looks 90% for hookups personality 60% for long term.if you could be good looking for one day and play around with having different personality types (to learn, quickly, that personality changes nothing) you’d never pretend the blackpill doesn’t exist ever again.
Kinda water tbh
Anyone can ltr, it’s easy as shit, nobody is talking about ltrs.Looks 90% for hookups personality 60% for long term.
This is aesthetics, not about dating at all don't waste my timeKinda water tbh
![]()
Male Attractiveness (Face) is NOT Normally Distributed
Normal Distribution Implies You See Just as Many Ugly People as Good Looking Ones, which I don't agree with tbh. First off, this is my rating scale for PSL. You can agree or disagree with the exactness, but allow me ± .25 in digression. Sub 4 PSL (Normie-ish and Below) 4-4.75 PSL (Normie to...looksmax.org
@ForeverRecession Figured out this exact same chart without being woman .. or maybe exposed?![]()
Keep copingtypical faggotnigger greycel. muh 1000 study indian dating app is proof blackpill never exists. you've obviously never observed female behavior around chads
honestly caged at it being a screenshot of a twitter posttypical faggotnigger greycel. muh 1000 study indian dating app is proof blackpill never exists. you've obviously never observed female behavior around chads
its not cope tbh nglKeep coping
Bro next time I'll ask for permission from your secretary if she'll allow me to link a post, that presents "male attractiveness" as a function/chart, and compare it to a post that...This is aesthetics, not about dating at all don't waste my time
I am not making a radical claim here so burden of proof is on you cuckBro next time I'll ask for permission from your secretary if she'll allow me to link a post, that presents "male attractiveness" as a function/chart, and compare it to a post that...
wait?
guess what?
Also talks about male attractiveness in the same way. The dating context only matters, if you go under the assumption, that women's thinking should be different to irl, because they are outnumbered in dating apps, and therefore inclined to be more selective. Which is a good assumption to make theoretically, but absolutely no way to prove it. But ye stay mad because I called your thread "Water"![]()
Did I make a claim? No. Did I say you made a claim (the twitter poster did) ? No. Were you unable to read for the second time and typed like a passive aggressive autist ? Yes. OverI am not making a radical claim here so burden of proof is on you cuck
Over for ur retarded ass for sureDid I make a claim? No. Did I say you made a claim (the twitter poster did) ? No. Were you unable to read for the second time and typed like a passive aggressive autist ? Yes. Over