The reason women hate bad looks is they serve as an indicator of low IQ and bad temperament

I got baguettes in the back of my ear

She gotta run thru the team before she talk to the lick

2 million cash now she woozy
Gimme me sum of ur money :y'all:
 
Utter shit low IQ take
Bad facial development is tightly correlated to troubled functions such as poor breathing, chewing, etc
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 4362 and Deleted member 18603
Utter shit low IQ take
Bad facial development is tightly correlated to troubled functions such as poor breathing, chewing, etc
And poor breathing reduces your IQ.
 
And poor breathing reduces your IQ.
Its like a fifth grade correlation in the rare condition you mouthbreathed your whole life, OP point is still low IQ garbage
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 18603
It makes plenty of sense if you think about it. Consider the fact that the ugliest demographics (ethnics, Indians (not the European looking Northern ones), blacks, poorer/working-class whites, etc) always ALWAYS have lower IQ on average and more primordial facial features.

Modern PC bullshit claims Europeans only stereotyped third-world populations as looking primitive because of racism, but this is not true. Many black and brown populations have facial features that legitimately look more 'stone age' compared to the other races (large, flat noses, big lips, etc). Even amongst whites themselves, the inferior/low IQ elements (working class, poor, etc) don't seem to have the same phenotype/look as the higher IQ/richer whites do. They look cruder.

I have a theory.

I think the reason women despise bad looks is that they indicate inferior intelligence and shittier temperament (more likely to abuse/beat the woman) which women instinctively associate with lesser status and a lower likelihood of being treated well. They look at the cavemen features and think "this person is dumb af and will also probably beat me".

What women actually want, are pretty but physically fit prettyboys. Tall and physically fit males with feminine faces. Ripped but cute. They associate that with fitness but also intelligence and good temperament.

What people call 'ugly' features are actually just primordial/brutish features.

But what about Asians you ask? They don't look that great yet are higher IQ, right? 2 things:

1. It's only East-Asians (Korea/Japan) that are high IQ.
2. Southern/Pacific Asians are brown and have lower IQ.
3. East-Asian males aren't really 'ugly' so much as they just lack masculine features (height/muscle/etc).
Omg jeremy meeks is a genius then
 
Omg jeremy meeks is a genius then
Does he have low IQ and bad temperament? In all the videos I've seen of him he comes across as a controlled and likable guy. Maybe not 'high IQ´ per see but he didn't strike me as dumb.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 4362
It makes plenty of sense if you think about it. Consider the fact that the ugliest demographics (ethnics, Indians (not the European looking Northern ones), blacks, poorer/working-class whites, etc) always ALWAYS have lower IQ on average and more primordial facial features.

Modern PC bullshit claims Europeans only stereotyped third-world populations as looking primitive because of racism, but this is not true. Many black and brown populations have facial features that legitimately look more 'stone age' compared to the other races (large, flat noses, big lips, etc). Even amongst whites themselves, the inferior/low IQ elements (working class, poor, etc) don't seem to have the same phenotype/look as the higher IQ/richer whites do. They look cruder.

I have a theory.

I think the reason women despise bad looks is that they indicate inferior intelligence and shittier temperament (more likely to abuse/beat the woman) which women instinctively associate with lesser status and a lower likelihood of being treated well. They look at the cavemen features and think "this person is dumb af and will also probably beat me".

What women actually want, are pretty but physically fit prettyboys. Tall and physically fit males with feminine faces. Ripped but cute. They associate that with fitness but also intelligence and good temperament.

What people call 'ugly' features are actually just primordial/brutish features.

But what about Asians you ask? They don't look that great yet are higher IQ, right? 2 things:

1. It's only East-Asians (Korea/Japan) that are high IQ.
2. Southern/Pacific Asians are brown and have lower IQ.
3. East-Asian males aren't really 'ugly' so much as they just lack masculine features (height/muscle/etc).
water is wet. woman fear bad genes. bad genes indicate poor health,looks, lower iq etc. how is this not blackpill 101?
 
3. East-Asian males aren't really 'ugly' so much as they just lack masculine features (height/muscle/etc).

Tall (and naturally a bit athletic) east asian dudes are facially very attractive in my experience
 

Similar threads

ivan.kuk
Replies
20
Views
111
ivan.kuk
ivan.kuk
sanguine
Replies
2
Views
37
pleasevanity
pleasevanity
NoExit
Replies
2
Views
28
NoExit
NoExit
thomasjiooo
Replies
14
Views
89
GoErOnFoids
GoErOnFoids
160cmcurry
Replies
21
Views
123
sonic55555
S

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top