doesnt prove anything its easier to be ugly than it is to be attractive due to old age, being fat or turbo ethnic features
and even the greyest of greys and normiest of normies wouldnt even percieve to anywhere close to a CL so having a so called "credible" creator call this CL is laughable beyond words
this is an org thread not high art do you expect it to be crime and punishement by fyodor dostoevsky or in the aeroplane over the sea by neutral milk hotel ?
Wow mate, great content you're posting.. Not.
crazy
why is being aware of an extremely popular novelist supposed to be indicative of trying to make your seem knowledgable? makes 0 sense
Wow, you know Fyodor Dostoevsky! We respect you so much more now! Irrelevant to the point. You posted pure garbage, stop inserting logical fallacies.
Yoo what would you say how many people out of 500 are 6’6
high ltn he looks lesbian
then explain why my thread is objectively bad rather than resorting to ad hominems
Objectively this is garbage. Disprove me.
You make 0 sense, that's the point. See the logic or are you going to rely on logical fallacies to save you?
> Useless
Right, keep up the ad hominems. Seems like you're the one projecting.
i dont think im underrating the guy at all his dimorphism is beyond rayped
You are. End of debate.
The issue is when the topic is useless and the thread provides no new commentary. False equivalency spotted.
Useless as it's nothing new added on + basic slop. Garbage. Objective. Disproven.
No, cheating and infidelity are nothing new. No clue where your heads at. You also missed my point. Hilarious.
You are.
Cool, so is everyone else's. Your point now is..?
and what by your criteria determines how useful someones thread is
So it can be useful.
No, cheating and infidelity are nothing new. No clue where your heads at. You also missed my point. Hilarious.
You are.
Cool, so is everyone else's. Your point now is..?
By
Never claimed he is CL, now did I?
No, because obesity is off health. Looks are relative. Your point makes no sense.
well i am not underrating him due to him looking lesbian and boneless and his dimorphism being beyond terribleBy
1. not being repetitive. If it is, it requires new commentary.
2. being a topic that has a use.
Never claimed he is CL, now did I?
No, because obesity is off health. Looks are relative. Your point makes no sense.
Low iq individual
So is everyone else. See how that plays a factor..?
I just stated how it's useless and you went past it. Hilarious.
Nope, not at all true. Prove what you said.
So is everyone else. See how that plays a factor..?
I just stated how it's useless and you went past it. Hilarious.
Nope, not at all true. Prove what you said.
Because it's useless and known.
Correct, they don't need to, everything is taught to children in this day and age.
No, your rating scale makes no sense. The average person is a 4-4.5? Are you basing it off the absolute human perfection? That cannot be objectively found. A .5 difference is also massive.
Cool, irrelevant as the baseline needs to be set at a 5/10. The baseline being at a 4-4.5/10 is no different than just shifting ratings a little bit. It doesn't change anything. Learn how distributions actually work.
- Doesn't benefit anyone
nope that is attainability cope to make it seem like if obese and fat men are the average then it should be a 5/10 meaning that being viewed as attractive is actually super easy when it isnt and trying to make the benchmark to be seen as universally attractive seem more attainable as methodology of self coping
Your argument relies on using the perfect human as the 10/10 baseline. We don't use that as there's no way of determining how they will look. We use relative figures as it's all the more useful. So yes, if everyone was fat, a slightly less fat guy will be above average.
Never claimed it was..
It does determine it. I've debunked your point many times now.
you have debunked nothingYour argument relies on using the perfect human as the 10/10 baseline. We don't use that as there's no way of determining how they will look. We use relative figures as it's all the more useful. So yes, if everyone was fat, a slightly less fat guy will be above average.
Never claimed it was..
It does determine it. I've debunked your point many times now.
Cool, not relevant to the point as that's not the framework we're arguing.
Nope, you just argue from a place of false objectivity when it's a relative scale. Regarding the other points, they've been debunked via every point needed.
Go ahead and tell me what makes a thread useful.
you sound like a clanker thats how much of an insufferable faggot you are thats bizzare
Wow, you know Fyodor Dostoevsky! We respect you so much more now! Irrelevant to the point. You posted pure garbage, stop inserting logical fallacies.
by your ai girlfriend? that you have to pay to talk to you
I'm liked in real life.
not even liked in the deepest slums of cumilla bangladesh
I'm liked in real life.
Hahah! Hilarious!
