D
Deleted member 20704
Doesn't vibe with humans much anymore.
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2022
- Posts
- 1,484
- Reputation
- 2,348
Seriously, nothing screams more non-NT than having zero ink on you, not even kidding here at all. What normies do you see with no ink? Other things that are more likely to be make you NT: smoking, drinking socially, & having tats = NT Bible 101 , NO CAPPING!
Definitely unlikely to be the ones getting laid. Getting a lot sex = must me NT. This isn't saying not having tats guarantees you're virgin, but it more likely does. Every guy I know who has been socially accepted (sub-Chad at least) ALWAYS has ink, whether a lil' or a lot.
See, to be a NT slayer you have to fit in, and in most cultures nowadays no tats = sign you're an outsider; a non norman/normshit; a weirdo out of the loop. It screams that you don't follow rules, listen to others, & aren't part of the herd -- which is why most incels don't have them.
You need that NT energy and bonding to be that "high energy cool guy" who has friends, social proof, common interests, etc. The gl aspie in the corner who no friends, no ink and no good social skills may in fact not be virgin but he'll never truly fit in and be a slayer either. Biggest slayer trait -- having tats. Periodt. 99% of the guys on here who slay have tattoos & are NT, especially if they're tall & jacked/roided as well.
Because remember: not fitting in ultimately means you're not acceptable socially -- & not socially accepted men out of the confines of society are losers. If you don't have this "mark of the beast" it tells others there is something about you that's NOT TYPICAL/NORMAL.
Losers do not slay in most cases, unless they can fake being NT somehow in other ways. Not saying tats will make any guy slay, but all else equally they can help ascend you somehow, especially if it's showy ink like back tats, torso, arms/sleeves you can see in normal clothing, neck, legs, etc. Women like normal guys more than non-normal ones, especially if all else is equal. So what good is being ABNORMAL + UGLY?
There's a major fact here associated with tats many don't understand ... It's a symbol; a cultural mark; a sign you're not a basement dwelling autist because that very ink "marks" you quite literally as a normie. It's one of the biggest reasons why guys with no tats = more likely to be non-NT = more likely to be incel. It's true that super gl guys don't "NEED" to be typical to get some girls, but they'll still lose out if non-NT.
This is basically all there is to it ... No ink = more likely to be loser = more likely to be socially ostracized = more likely to be never slay/have lower success. You gotta fit in with the herd UNLESS you literally set the standards, which almost nobody but celebrities do. So either make law, or follow it. If you're not the one setting the standards then you either follow them, or make the standards need not apply to you.
Definitely unlikely to be the ones getting laid. Getting a lot sex = must me NT. This isn't saying not having tats guarantees you're virgin, but it more likely does. Every guy I know who has been socially accepted (sub-Chad at least) ALWAYS has ink, whether a lil' or a lot.
See, to be a NT slayer you have to fit in, and in most cultures nowadays no tats = sign you're an outsider; a non norman/normshit; a weirdo out of the loop. It screams that you don't follow rules, listen to others, & aren't part of the herd -- which is why most incels don't have them.
You need that NT energy and bonding to be that "high energy cool guy" who has friends, social proof, common interests, etc. The gl aspie in the corner who no friends, no ink and no good social skills may in fact not be virgin but he'll never truly fit in and be a slayer either. Biggest slayer trait -- having tats. Periodt. 99% of the guys on here who slay have tattoos & are NT, especially if they're tall & jacked/roided as well.
Because remember: not fitting in ultimately means you're not acceptable socially -- & not socially accepted men out of the confines of society are losers. If you don't have this "mark of the beast" it tells others there is something about you that's NOT TYPICAL/NORMAL.
Losers do not slay in most cases, unless they can fake being NT somehow in other ways. Not saying tats will make any guy slay, but all else equally they can help ascend you somehow, especially if it's showy ink like back tats, torso, arms/sleeves you can see in normal clothing, neck, legs, etc. Women like normal guys more than non-normal ones, especially if all else is equal. So what good is being ABNORMAL + UGLY?
There's a major fact here associated with tats many don't understand ... It's a symbol; a cultural mark; a sign you're not a basement dwelling autist because that very ink "marks" you quite literally as a normie. It's one of the biggest reasons why guys with no tats = more likely to be non-NT = more likely to be incel. It's true that super gl guys don't "NEED" to be typical to get some girls, but they'll still lose out if non-NT.
This is basically all there is to it ... No ink = more likely to be loser = more likely to be socially ostracized = more likely to be never slay/have lower success. You gotta fit in with the herd UNLESS you literally set the standards, which almost nobody but celebrities do. So either make law, or follow it. If you're not the one setting the standards then you either follow them, or make the standards need not apply to you.
Last edited: